Quote:
Originally Posted by OkhamsRazor
What does it mean to support the troops?
Is the only thing required to support the troops, a declaration of support? How do you support the troops? Do you write them letters? Do you send them boxes of goodies from home? Do you enlist? Do you comfort their families? Do you conserve on fuel? Do you attend rallies?
Or is the extent of support limited to a bumper sticker and a stated position?
|
Can I get an amen up in here?
Great post Okhams.
On behalf of America I'd like to answer your questions.
Yes. By saying I support the troops. No. No. Oh god no. Never met them. I bought a Hummer 3, they're smaller. Nope, too busy. And a resounding yes!
I think that it is a travesty that the anti-war and the anti-troop crowd get morphed together. (Much like Bin Laden morphed into Saddam) It gets generalized even more in that if you are anti-Iraq war you are somehow an out-of-touch pacifist as well. It is much easier to dismiss the whole group and their legitimate concerns if you can associate them with the extremists who protest at funerals and such. Because all you need to create a crisis is increase media coverage...immigration for example. The funeral protesters are everywhere!! Better not to be lumped in with that crew. Now get back in line and Baa for me one time.
My father and my brother are both currently serving in Iraq. I've had more friends that I can count on my fingers that have gone over there and come back or been restationed, some still serving there and one who came back in a box. One that will never get to see his baby. One who will never get to grow old and have the grandkids over. Screw it, one who will never get to get smashed on Jagermeister and have a menage a trois with the waitress at Applebees.
If it was your father in Iraq, I'm sure it would be outrageous to imply you don't support the troops, whatever the definition of such means to you. But if it was the Department of Defense calling about your father, could you justify this war to yourself then? Which excuse would you use? Saddam had a death ray? Yellow cake? Gassing his own people? Imminent threat? 9/11?(I think Saddam was on Flight 77) Or will you just go with the current (at least I think its current, why did we go there again currently?) arrogant Johnny Applepie story where he runs around and spreads democracy with inadequate troop numbers and no exit strategy, because they will love us and shower us with rose petals upon arrival.
Why aren't the people sending our troops to fight in faraway lands for, let's just say questionable reasons accused of being anti-troop? Without them there would be no funeral protests.
I would like to add before I am accused, I think that anyone heartless and callous enough to go to a grieving family and protest is without a doubt the lowest form of existence on this planet.
I am curious, if anyone here is old enough to remember what WWII was like on the homefront. Because it seemed to me that that was an extremly justifiable war to all Americans, we were attacked so we repaid them with two mushroom clouds. Hmmm...wasn't that one of the fear mongering talking points of this war? Can't let the smoking gun be a mushroom cloud. Women started going to work, the whole Rosie the Riveter bit. We were conserving resources. We were SUPPORTING THE TROOPS!!