Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > War in Iraq

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2007, 01:41 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,173
Default Bush Completely Ignores Iraq Study Group

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0112/p01s03-usfp.html
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2007, 10:19 AM
RASTAMAN's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Bush does this because "HE'S THE DECIDER" and is on the bottle again! Laura is really starting to get pissed off at "DRY DRUNK" Bush.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2007, 02:45 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,777
Default

Quote:
Bush Completely Ignores Iraq Study Group

GOOD

Should be called the Iraq Surrender Group because not once in the entire report was the word victory mentioned.

They didn't even consider the aspect that success was a possiblility
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 07:42 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 879
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689 View Post
GOOD

Should be called the Iraq Surrender Group because not once in the entire report was the word victory mentioned.

They didn't even consider the aspect that success was a possiblility
Why would they mention Iraq Victory?! How Un-american.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 08:14 AM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN View Post
Bush does this because "HE'S THE DECIDER" and is on the bottle again! Laura is really starting to get pissed off at "DRY DRUNK" Bush.

Just once I wish you make an intelligent argument instread of calling names, engaging in baseless personal attacks and screaming like a crazed lunatic.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 08:16 AM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post

What would make anyone think that sitting down with Iran and Syria is a good idea? I just don't understand what these people are thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 09:35 AM
CrankyYankee's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,969
Default Success

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689 View Post
GOOD

Should be called the Iraq Surrender Group because not once in the entire report was the word victory mentioned.

They didn't even consider the aspect that success was a possiblility
How do you define success in Iraq?

It seems unlikely that the current effort is going to have a positive outcome.
Take out the extremists, and there is nobody left. Would you have us rule Iraq like Saddam? Then we become the evil....

The Iraq war is a debacle that SHOULD have been avoided. Expanding the hostilities is a huge mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:21 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,594
Default

"baseless personal attacks"

>>>What makes you think they are 'baseless'?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 11:03 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,164
Default

January 16, 2007
Another Vietnam?
By Thomas Sowell

Nothing is easier than to second-guess decisions made in wartime. Anyone who has bothered to read the history of wars knows that very few wars have been without disastrous surprises, often on both sides.

It is not that the people in charge are stupid. Too many things are unpredictable in war, despite politicians who demand timetables, as if running a war is like running a train.

We can now look at the Iraq war with hindsight, as no President or Secretary of Defense could when making decisions that had to be made. Still, it can be useful to determine with hindsight what went wrong, if only to avoid similar mistakes in the future and to see what needs to be changed in the present.

Despite all the politicians who were demanding more troops a year ago, and who have turned around and are now demanding that no more troops be sent to Iraq, the purely military aspects of the war have gone better than in most wars.

We have learned the hard way, notably in the Vietnam war, that military victories are not enough. American troops scored a big victory on the battlefield in 1968 that was presented in the American media as a big defeat -- and that began the political unravelling of the Vietnam war.

Many in the media seem to think that they did something noble, to get us out of an "unwinnable" war. But the war was unwinnable only because they made it so politically. Even after American troops were withdrawn from Vietnam, South Vietnam was able to hold off the invaders from North Vietnam.

Only after Congress cut off financial support for South Vietnam, while the North Vietnamese continued to get support from the Communist bloc, did South Vietnam fall.

Since then, even the Communist conquerors have admitted that they did not win on the battlefield, but in the American media and in the American political arena, surrounded by an atmosphere created by a defeatist media.

Most of the today's media, led by the New York Times, has been even more blatantly one-sided in their reporting. Everyone I have heard from in person who has actually been in Iraq paints a far different picture from that of the gloom and doom of the media.

Make no mistake about it, we can still lose this war, but it will have to be lost politically. Most of the tragic chaos in Iraq today has its origins in politics.

American and other coalition troops in Iraq have had their hands tied with "rules of engagement" based on political, rather than military, considerations.

You cannot have law and order in any country where armed bands of competing militias can terrorize the population. Instead of confronting these militias at the outset with an ultimatum to disarm or be killed, we let the Iraqi government veto what our military forces could do, leaving Shi'ite militias intact in Baghdad's "Sadr City" neighborhood and elsewhere.

Having pushed the "democracy" vision for Iraq, we could not simply disregard the country's elected government. But democracy arose in western civilization centuries after law and order had been established. We tried to do it in the reverse order in Iraq.

When push comes to shove, people will support tyranny rather than suffer lethal chaos that makes normal everyday life impossible for themselves and their children.

The success or failure of the troop surge in Iraq may depend far more on whether those troops can again be hamstrung by politically restrictive "rules of engagement" than on how many troops there are.

The Maliki government is politically dependent on one of the very Baghdad militias that needs to be disarmed. We can pressure and warn Maliki all we want, but his real choice will be whether he can survive -- either politically or personally -- without militia support.

Our choice may become whether we are prepared to sacrifice more American lives in order to prop up the Maliki government or whether we are prepared to sacrifice the Maliki government in order to restore law and order in Iraq.

That government is a product of our "nation-building" under the banner of a "democracy" for which Iraq may not have been ready.

Copyright 2007 Creators Syndicate
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 11:05 AM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 16,859
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

As usual Thomas Sowell is able to cut through the crap and make an intelligent statement.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.

US Army 1977-2007

Go Sooners
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0