Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > War in Iraq

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007, 08:47 PM
Smitty0311's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedomlover View Post
The borders of Iraq have not since the onset of this war, been effectively dealt with. You yourself has stated that (you believe) it is Iran and Syria (not civil war) that is the cause of all the violence.

Secondly, we are not now dealing with the Governments of Syria or Iran. We are not putting pressure on them to stay out of Iraq. And to my knowledge, we have not made plans to deal with them.

Third, until the new congress took over, and with it the threat of withdrawal, we were not putting enough pressure on the Iraq government to stop the religious factions from fight. (And yes, they are causing violence, even the Repubs have acknowledged this). I will assume that they have knowledge that you are not privy to.

Fourth, up the point of the threat of us pulling out, the new Iraq government, had close ties to Al Sadr, which controls the Shiate militia. That means, that this government now maybe be suspect. They agreed to protect all their citizens, including Sunnis and they have not done so.

As I stated, until the violence is quelled, none of the other objectives can be accomplished, ergo, that is why things are so bad in Iraq right now. (An admission even our President has admitted to.) Therefore we have not accomplished most of what is on the list of objectives.

Also, as stated, I believe that 20,000 troops will only bring about more of the same. The 20,000 does not even come close to the amount that I have suggested.

While my plan may not be perfect, it is not the plan we have been dealing with for the last three years.
No No No. Tell me how this works. What will the troops need to do that we arent allready doing. How will this benefit us. You started it. There are one thousand answeres to my questions. I understand if you dont answer. I am not being sarcastic. I really understand!
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." Ronald Reagan
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007, 08:49 PM
Smitty0311's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob View Post
Smitty, if this was your plan how would you implement it?
Im not typing for that long. bring an issue and i will adress it.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." Ronald Reagan
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007, 08:55 PM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 16,859
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

I thought that you would be glad to tell us how you would implement the plan. Oh well, I am doing laundry right now and can't stay seated either for more than a few minutes at a time.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.

US Army 1977-2007

Go Sooners
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007, 08:59 PM
Smitty0311's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob View Post
I thought that you would be glad to tell us how you would implement the plan. Oh well, I am doing laundry right now and can't stay seated either for more than a few minutes at a time.
I would love to have the time to explain
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." Ronald Reagan
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2007, 11:11 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,493
Default

Smitty, first let me say that I think our troops are doing an excellent job. It is the strategy I think , where we are lacking.

The very first thing I would do to implement this, is spell out to the public and congress all of the objectives. I would not, however go into specifics. However, you would have to explain some of the why of such a heavy force. I would use retired and present Military Leaders to sell this to them.

I would let it be known that Iraq will be expected to help
shoulder the expense of the war and the rebuilding of Iraq, and make it clear that if we pull out the US will virtually lose all monies expended so far.

Then Smitty, I would hit them with the full force of the US military. I would put the National Guard, Reserves, and some army units in charge of Patrolling and Controlling the Borders, I would put the army guarding the perimeter of all the hot spots, enforcing curfews, making sure people are not where they aren't suppose to be. Then I would have the Marines and Special Forces, ie Green Berets, ect., into performing special ops, major sweeps into the hot spots to get rid of the terrorists, & put down any opposition. I think with the force that I want to use, this will free up the forces from doing spot checks and allow them to really hit them hard. I would also change the rules of engagement. They would not have to wait until they are fired upon.

In concurrance with this, we would be training the Iraq military and police forces to do their job. Obviously some of this would be on the job training.

I would set up diplomatic ties to Iran and Syria to the extent of letting them no that we will not brook any type of engagement from them. I would compel Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Emirites(sp), into convincing Iran and Syria that it would not be in their best interest to interfer in Iraq, now or in the future.

Now Smitty, this is the most important part. Because I am not a military strategist and do not know all the ends and outs of war, while I would lay out the general objectives of the war, I would then turn this war over the Military and let them do what they do best. Make war. I really think if this were to happen, we could make short order of this war.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:31 AM
gdfather02's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fort Lewis, WA
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedomlover View Post
Smitty, first let me say that I think our troops are doing an excellent job. It is the strategy I think , where we are lacking.

The very first thing I would do to implement this, is spell out to the public and congress all of the objectives. I would not, however go into specifics. However, you would have to explain some of the why of such a heavy force. I would use retired and present Military Leaders to sell this to them.

I would let it be known that Iraq will be expected to help
shoulder the expense of the war and the rebuilding of Iraq, and make it clear that if we pull out the US will virtually lose all monies expended so far.

Then Smitty, I would hit them with the full force of the US military. I would put the National Guard, Reserves, and some army units in charge of Patrolling and Controlling the Borders, I would put the army guarding the perimeter of all the hot spots, enforcing curfews, making sure people are not where they aren't suppose to be. Then I would have the Marines and Special Forces, ie Green Berets, ect., into performing special ops, major sweeps into the hot spots to get rid of the terrorists, & put down any opposition. I think with the force that I want to use, this will free up the forces from doing spot checks and allow them to really hit them hard. I would also change the rules of engagement. They would not have to wait until they are fired upon.

In concurrance with this, we would be training the Iraq military and police forces to do their job. Obviously some of this would be on the job training.

I would set up diplomatic ties to Iran and Syria to the extent of letting them no that we will not brook any type of engagement from them. I would compel Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Emirites(sp), into convincing Iran and Syria that it would not be in their best interest to interfer in Iraq, now or in the future.

Now Smitty, this is the most important part. Because I am not a military strategist and do not know all the ends and outs of war, while I would lay out the general objectives of the war, I would then turn this war over the Military and let them do what they do best. Make war. I really think if this were to happen, we could make short order of this war.
Good post.

This piecemeal crap is one of the reasons we are failing over there. As far as your troop levels, it damn near follows the Powell Doctrine, whereas you go go in with overwhelming force, unleash the military, and let us do what we do best. Policing and crap like that is all cute, but it isn't what we do best.

One other area that you didn't address was the fact that we made a mistake in completely dismantling the Iraqi army forces. We are now faced with establishing a force, from scratch.
__________________
"A committee is a group of people who individually can do nothing but together can decide that nothing can be done."
Fred Allen

"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."
George Bernard Shaw

"Politics is the art of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable."
John Galbraith


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:45 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gdfather02 View Post
Good post.

This piecemeal crap is one of the reasons we are failing over there. As far as your troop levels, it damn near follows the Powell Doctrine, whereas you go go in with overwhelming force, unleash the military, and let us do what we do best. Policing and crap like that is all cute, but it isn't what we do best.

One other area that you didn't address was the fact that we made a mistake in completely dismantling the Iraqi army forces. We are now faced with establishing a force, from scratch.
Honestly, I got the troop levels from a little research, suggestions scattered around this forum, and what I honestly thought our military could handle.

Their military i did fail to address and is quite the sticky situation considering that the religious factions are fighting amongst themselves. Whom do you trust? However, it does need to be made clear to the Iraqi's that eventually, hopefully sooner, than later, that they will be responsible for defending themselves. Maybe the unifing factor for them will be to keep Iran, Syria and other outside influences out of their country.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:50 AM
gdfather02's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fort Lewis, WA
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedomlover View Post
Honestly, I got the troop levels from a little research, suggestions scattered around this forum, and what I honestly thought our military could handle.

Their military i did fail to address and is quite the sticky situation considering that the religious factions are fighting amongst themselves. Whom do you trust? However, it does need to be made clear to the Iraqi's that eventually, hopefully sooner, than later, that they will be responsible for defending themselves. Maybe the unifing factor for them will be to keep Iran, Syria and other outside influences out of their country.
Trust is a difficult thing in the ME, as many of the citizens over there put their faith above even that of their nation. The key, as you stated in a round a bout way, is getting them to unserstand that it is in their best interest, for long term stability, to see that their nation is a success. And, as you said, that would include choosing to keep Iranian and Syrian influences out of their country.
__________________
"A committee is a group of people who individually can do nothing but together can decide that nothing can be done."
Fred Allen

"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."
George Bernard Shaw

"Politics is the art of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable."
John Galbraith


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2007, 03:15 AM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
Nobody cares what your plan is, you are not there
Would it change anyone's opinion if my dad was?
__________________
"I have come to the conclusion that politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians."
---Charles de Gaulle---

"The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that refuse military service."
---Albert Einstein---

A village in Texas has lost it's idiot.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2007, 03:18 AM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
In your plan is it perfectly acceptable to leave the country in chaos? Would it be acceptable to have Iraq taken over by Iran or Syria? That would be the outcome of our pulling out now. I guess it would be alright to just leave the Iraqi people to fend for themselves at this point.

Good plan
First off, the USA entered out of economic purposes, despite the lies you were told about WMDs. Second, the USA screwed up the country themselves, pretty much single handedly. You follow? If any of the events you said occured, it would be the USA's fault. That's why they are still there: to lick their own rear ends and clean the mess they left behind. So, overall, they should have actually had a PLAN when they entered!
__________________
"I have come to the conclusion that politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians."
---Charles de Gaulle---

"The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that refuse military service."
---Albert Einstein---

A village in Texas has lost it's idiot.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0