Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > War in Iraq

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:52 PM
StormanNorman's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty0311 View Post
Syria! Where elts could they be. Saddam couldent prove he destroyed them! Whe know he had them in 1998 by the report here> http://www.state.gov/www/regions/nea...ite_paper.html .
His generals say theyer in Syria http://www.wate.com/Global/story.asp?S=4456917 . And this general> http://www.brutallyhonest.org/brutal...are_the_i.html. You are too easy Spitty!
Not true, Smitty....CIA did a pretty good comprehensive report from inside Iraq after the invasion and made some pretty strong conclusions. Basically, they said that Iraq had no WMD program since 1991.

https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq...004/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:54 PM
StormanNorman's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty0311 View Post
Read post #8! Hard facts on the wmd's that were in iraq! What do you have?
Smitty, your report is from February 1998. What the hell did anyone know definitively in 1998 (especially if they didn't know in 2003)?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:54 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitty View Post
Too bad we are just there for the oil.
you post one week link from the GLOBAL MONITER and smitty posts article after article and this all you have to say.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:55 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Still Dizzy View Post
The ones that were not used on his own people are probably in Syria.
"probably in Syria" that is hard evidence, we should shock n awe them.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:56 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StormanNorman View Post
Smitty, your report is from February 1998. What the hell did anyone know definitively in 1998 (especially if they didn't know in 2003)?
this isn't even an argument. this is like saying Rasta didn't even know he was gay in 1998 so why would he know in 2003.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:56 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gixaholic View Post
you post one week link from the GLOBAL MONITER and smitty posts article after article and this all you have to say.
I don't feel like surfing the web for Hun stories. Hey, Saddam has now paid for what he did. So we won right?? It's over now??
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:57 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitty View Post
I don't feel like surfing the web for Hun stories. Hey, Saddam has now paid for what he did. So we won right?? It's over now??
why do you want us to leave iraq. whats in it for you..........
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 07:23 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spitty View Post
"probably in Syria" that is hard evidence, we should shock n awe them.

That is not as hard as "Well we didn't find them, so they CAN'T exist?"
__________________
When seconds count, Police are only minutes away.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 07:30 PM
StormanNorman's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,407
Default

OK kids, let's review (since I have been through this argument so many times). The CIA did a very comprehensive study INSIDE Iraq after the war. They found no evidence (zero, natta, zip) of a current WMD program in Iraq....at least, not since 1991. Not only did they not have any WMDs, they didn't have the means to make them, no expertise, no infrastructure, etc. See the link below.

https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq...004/index.html

Here are some clips of their findings:

Quote:
Key Findings
Iraq Survey Group (ISG) discovered further evidence of the maturity and significance of the pre-1991 Iraqi Nuclear Program but found that Iraq’s ability to reconstitute a nuclear weapons program progressively decayed after that date.

• Saddam Hussein ended the nuclear program in 1991 following the Gulf war. ISG found no evidence to suggest concerted efforts to restart the program.

• While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered.
Now, this is not from some newspaper article, fellas.

There is another set of reports from the Senate Select Intel Committee that cast serious doubts on much of the HUMINT coming out of Iraq regarding the alleged WMD programs. They state (Conclusion #2, Pg 113)

Quote:
the Iraqi National Congress attempted to influence US policy on Iraq by providing false information through defectors to convince the US that Iraq was pursuing WMDs and had links to terrorists."

http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf
http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiinc.pdf


One last point (for smitty, Gix, and Diz), if it is really a possibility that Syria has some or all of Saddam's dreaded WMD arsenal, then why are we just sitting with our thumbs up our asses? We are pressuring Iran and N. Korea....why not Syria? Maybe because the Bush Administration has faced reality....at least when it comes to Iraq's WMDs....or lack thereof. Not to mention....do you really think they could've moved them into Syria without us detecting this mass movement??

Last edited by StormanNorman; 01-05-2007 at 07:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 07:52 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
Default

ok kids why do libs love polls. Everyone knows polls can be skewed in any direction they choose them to. I wonder what the demographics where of the people who took this poll. And as with any poll most of the questions are loaded .

Anyway there are countless articles factually reporting the opposite of what this
poll sais.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0