Roman, it is very funny you should post this because when I caught 'Face The Nation' this morning Joe Biden was talking about the Iraq war and the Bob Woodward book (and addressed this issue). I did not necessarily find the comments on the book very informative because there is a lot of 'he said, she said' about this. My point is that Biden and Bob Scheiffer got to a juncture in the conversation about which party does have plan to end this or take it in a different/constructive direction.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n2054306.shtml
I went to the CBS site and I am sorry they do not seem to have transcribed that last part of this which I found the most important part. Biden ends up there (your point) towards the end but not before being very critical of the current direction of the administration's plan; he expands on 'staying the course' is a bad option and Rumsfeld should resign.
Then, after that Biden does try to be constructive and offer an alternative. He proposes a political/diplomatic solution that divides Iraq into three 'sectors.'
You also bring up a good point that Biden was not going to expand on. I think Biden is right and I personally have used his points in many posts but it does get complicated when talking about commodities and natural resources. This is very important because oil is the big thing in this really.
Those who have the gold make the rules and that should not be overlooked when considering the battle between Shiites and Sunnis. Kurds are at such a disadvantage as a minority they are going to have a rough time when negociating a solution to all this.
I do believe in this and have for a long time (the three sectors), it takes the region to a place that is what the true ethnic make-up of what it is dating back to Mesopotamia.