Are you saying that because democrats don't watch FoxNews they should be denied voting rights and their movements restrained?

Not at all... and sadly, for you, I didn't say anything which could possibly have lead any reasonable person to such an inference.

I am saying that because leftists are incapable of reason and that the proof of that is evident in the absurd beliefs such as 'the social contract' that their input into all matters political can only result in catastrophe, calamity and chaos; thus they should never be lent credence of any kind, provided power of ANY KIND and in no circumstancesshould they EVER be given any measure of political voice what so ever.

Used to be a handshake meant something.

Things are not at all like what they were back then...if you don't believe that, you weren't there.

__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."

Which side will you be on?


OBAMA/PEROT

ROFL... Even a handshake implies an agreement sis. Which is the point isn't it? There is no agreement between 'society' and anyone that they're goign to be cared for... And an agreement is still but one of the elements essential to a contract.

Areyoushittin'me?

You guys and your fine print...

The author is expressing values that were generally accepted by society...is it really necessary to show that those values came from written documents? I trust that even you can figure that one out, sis.

__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."

Which side will you be on?


OBAMA/PEROT

Well let's see... I'm a part of that society and I haven't agreed to anything of the kind. So there is no such agreement. As I said it is a MYTH, A LIE, a purposeful deception...

To say that such is generally accepted is not factual. You and the left claim that to be true, when in fact is is NOT true, as there IS NO AGREEMENT, THERE IS NO CONTRACT; be it written, verbal or implied.

THAT, Sis, is why contracts and agreements have very specific elements for them to be considered binding... so that people are not confined by agreements to which they had no consent, offered nor accepted any consideration and no stated time frame... Otherwise, some jackass can come along and claim that you had tacitly agreed to give him your house if he ever needed it and if your general group agreement ever became customary, then you'd have little choice other than to move to another house.

Now while most of you are saying to yourselves: "Oh NO! That's bad..." a lot of leftists will be nodding their collective heads saying to themselves: "YES! Why should THAT guy have a house when I do NOT? We have a social contract which says we are all equal and an amendment to the Constitution which says everyone has to be treated fairly and equally, so no one should have a house of their own, if everyone doesn't have a house of their own."

But that is what makes them Leftists... they lack the means to reason.