Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > War in Iraq

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #341 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:29 PM
Cordelier's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me? View Post
I'm not arguing that it was "illegal" either...at least not according to our Congress...it may be by UN standards though...in fact, didn't Kofi Annan declare it as such?

Sure, 678 was applicable, in fact, in the first paragraph of 687 is states as such...now go on and show me where 687 authorized the removal of Saddam...it didn't.
Kofi Annan was only Secretary-General of the UN, though - he wasn't King of the World. His opinion doesn't carry the force of law. Would it have been a good move for the US & UK to obtain a second Security Council Resolution? Yes. Was it necessary? I don't think so.

Resolution 687 by itself only put obligations on Iraq to comply. Resolution 1441 by itself only confirmed that Iraq hadn't complied with Resolution 687. Resolution 678 was the authority Coalition forces used to use "all necessary means" to deal Iraqi non-compliance with the relevant Security Council resolutions.

You can't view these Resolutions individually - they're all tied together.
Reply With Quote
  #342 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:30 PM
areyoushittin'me?'s Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
Does not Resolution 1441 cite Resolution 678?
Yup...and if Saddam went back into Kuwait we could have kicked him out...again.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
Which war? Korea or Iraq?
Iraq...from a UN perspective.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
Really? Well, when was Resolution 678 revoked then?
Hasn't been that I'm aware...what's your point?
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



OBAMA/PEROT
Reply With Quote
  #343 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:31 PM
Amazed's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 4,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
Kofi Annan was only Secretary-General of the UN, though - he wasn't King of the World. His opinion doesn't carry the force of law. Would it have been a good move for the US & UK to obtain a second Security Council Resolution? Yes. Was it necessary? I don't think so.

Resolution 687 by itself only put obligations on Iraq to comply. Resolution 1441 by itself only confirmed that Iraq hadn't complied with Resolution 687. Resolution 678 was the authority Coalition forces used to use "all necessary means" to deal Iraqi non-compliance with the relevant Security Council resolutions.

You can't view these Resolutions individually - they're all tied together.
The same point that's been made again and again..be careful, you'll go on ignore next.
__________________
"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world...
...and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #344 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:35 PM
Cordelier's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me? View Post
Yup...and if Saddam went back into Kuwait we could have kicked him out...again.
So why do you feel Resolution 678 only applied to Iraqi forces in Kuwait? Why didn't it also apply to enforcing the Gulf War ceasefire?
Reply With Quote
  #345 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:35 PM
areyoushittin'me?'s Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
Kofi Annan was only Secretary-General of the UN, though - he wasn't King of the World. His opinion doesn't carry the force of law. Would it have been a good move for the US & UK to obtain a second Security Council Resolution? Yes. Was it necessary? I don't think so.
I agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
Resolution 687 by itself only put obligations on Iraq to comply. Resolution 1441 by itself only confirmed that Iraq hadn't complied with Resolution 687. Resolution 678 was the authority Coalition forces used to use "all necessary means" to deal Iraqi non-compliance with the relevant Security Council resolutions.
Yes...it was the authority to enforce any and ALL other resolutions...NONE OF WHICH called for the removal of Saddam.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
You can't view these Resolutions individually - they're all tied together.
I agree....as I said before...show me JUST ONE that called for the removal of Saddam.
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



OBAMA/PEROT
Reply With Quote
  #346 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:37 PM
Cordelier's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazed View Post
The same point that's been made again and again..be careful, you'll go on ignore next.
*L* The way I figure it, that's how you know you've won.
Reply With Quote
  #347 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:38 PM
areyoushittin'me?'s Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,311
Default

Amazed...
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



OBAMA/PEROT
Reply With Quote
  #348 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:38 PM
Amazed's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 4,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
So why do you feel Resolution 678 only applied to Iraqi forces in Kuwait? Why didn't it also apply to enforcing the Gulf War ceasefire?
It will all depend on what the definition of the word "is" is.....
__________________
"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world...
...and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #349 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:39 PM
Amazed's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 4,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me? View Post
Amazed...
I am good at being under your skin..and yet, you cannot do the same...why is that? Have you defined the word "is" yet?
__________________
"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world...
...and then we fucked up the end game." - Charlie Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #350 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:39 PM
areyoushittin'me?'s Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordelier View Post
So why do you feel Resolution 678 only applied to Iraqi forces in Kuwait? Why didn't it also apply to enforcing the Gulf War ceasefire?
Because that's what the resolutions called for...how do you figure bombing the hell out of a place is enforcing a cease fire?
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



OBAMA/PEROT
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0