Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > War in Iraq
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:44 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Kentucky
Posts: 649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul H View Post
Please... please folks.... vote for Barrack Obama so that my dead friends can be brought back from the dead. Also, vote for him 'cause we can bring Changey Mcchangerson and peace to the warmongering world. changey changefuck.

also..... change.

Please list for me, if you would.... how many times you've fought a war in Iraq, how many times you've seen first-hand how much progress has been made, and how many dead soldiers/marines/airmen you know personally. Then, on a scale of one to ten, rate what right you have to use a fucking number as a fitting representaion of my friends' sacrifice. Discuss.

change.

We'll worry about bringing eachother home alive. You worry about hackey-sack. Shut the fuck up.

-paul
************************************************** ***
"Paul", when you are/were there, and loose/lost dear friends & comrades, it does really become very personal. I know that, I was there & did that (different war/different time/same thing).

It is personal most definately: but it is NOT exclussively personal: the Nation as a whole has a responsibility to care & become involved; and a responsibility to speak out to the matters at hand.

Unfortunately sometimes "speaking out" is not as reverent as it should be: I was hit in the face with a snowball when in uniform escorting a fallen friend home I stepped off the plane in 1973, that was not very reverent. I was pretty angry, eventually I realized that the thrower was out of bounds & wrong, but in the end the notion & belief that the war was not good for the Nation was the privilage of every American. ...(paul)
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:51 AM
Reynard1967's Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Columbus OH.
Posts: 821
Default

From one Paul to another ...well said. And fine comeback to none
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:22 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jinx View Post
Do you lie just to be lying?

Bringing Our Troops Home
Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.

Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Iraq
I will not blame you for Obama's incompetent lies.

FactCheck.org: Stuck in Iraq?

Sen. Barack Obama took a very similar position as Hillary, saying some U.S. troops would remain for an indefinite period for "counterterrorism activities," which we presume means combat troops.obama

Russert: Will you pledge that by January 2013, the end of your first term more than five years from now, there will be no U.S. troops in Iraq?
Obama: I think it's hard to project four years from now, and I think it would be irresponsible. We don't know what contingency will be out there. What I can promise is that if there are still troops in Iraq when I take office [and] if there's no timetable [for withdrawal], then I will drastically reduce our presence there to the mission of protecting our embassy, protecting our civilians and making sure that we're carrying out counterterrorism activities there.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:25 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,342
Default

That sorta blows your whole premise of Dems surrendering, eh dumbshit?
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:28 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,342
Default

"The troops are coming home in phases. Nevertheless, they are still there because Democrats have made it clear, if they win the White House, Iraq will be handed to the Al Qaida."
__________________
"Then yer very next post:


No, Obama said he would bring the troops home no earlier than 2013."



Go fuck yerself, bitchTroll.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:48 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Kentucky
Posts: 649
Default

Well "crowley", it does not really matter much where Al Quaida is located: we will have to go after them wherever they are. Killing them in Iraq could not be any harder then it is now, we are not getting to them in Pakistan: in away it might be easier in Iraq.

I still believe we need a very tallented, very mean, very well trained & well equiped, force of special ruthless warriors, that can & will deploy anywhere - anytime to destroy & devistate anyone that intends the nation harm. If some foreign government is giving safe harbor to those that would harm us, then we could step on them too in the process: and perhaps governments would do a better job at managing their own house.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:57 AM
crowonapost's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pjwky View Post
Well "crowley", it does not really matter much where Al Quaida is located: we will have to go after them wherever they are. Killing them in Iraq could not be any harder then it is now, we are not getting to them in Pakistan: in away it might be easier in Iraq.

I still believe we need a very tallented, very mean, very well trained & well equiped, force of special ruthless warriors, that can & will deploy anywhere - anytime to destroy & devistate anyone that intends the nation harm. If some foreign government is giving safe harbor to those that would harm us, then we could step on them too in the process: and perhaps governments would do a better job at managing their own house.
I agree with you. I also think that we have purposefully chosen to be behind the current world realities when it comes to also training for Peace keeping forces that work in conjunction with the rapid response forces. Europe, because of their long standing interactions with these issues have incorporated that into their military infrastructures.
Where ever our military forces have been in a community for a longer period of time than a year deployment...That is the command structure locally has stayed instead of being changed after that one year, they have found ways to interact & work through problems in the local community. Regretfully this has been a backwards way of having to learn that there needs to be a peace keeping contingent of the military. Before Iraq the U.S. military actually had disdain for this aspect that Europe has been incorporating fro a while Quietly based on the real world issues on the ground they are begrudgingly incorporating these lessons.

This is a far more underestimated & an important aspect of the 'complete' tool set we need to deal with these insurgent issues.
__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 12:05 PM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley View Post
"The troops are coming home in phases. Nevertheless, they are still there because Democrats have made it clear, if they win the White House, Iraq will be handed to the Al Qaida."
__________________
"Then yer very next post:


No, Obama said he would bring the troops home no earlier than 2013."



Go fuck yerself, bitchTroll.
Thanks for pointing out Obama's incompetent lies.

A quote from Obama's own website:

Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.

Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Iraq
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 12:07 PM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,869
Default

Obama's lack of experience and comprehension are obvious.
Obama is clueless about foreign policy.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 12:18 PM
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow View Post
Obama's lack of experience and comprehension are obvious.
Obama is clueless about foreign policy.
You forget about the time he personally brought peace to that magical floating island nation where the unicorns and leprechauns were fighting a bitter civil war against one another.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings