Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > War in Iraq
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2008, 06:22 PM
Stryker's Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: FOB Rustamiyah
Posts: 875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noneof yourbusiness View Post
Ill take the word of men on the ground that are seeing the situation through practical eyes.


Liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiike.....















































Me?
__________________
Emotional Turmoil - The only thing you should feel when shooting terrorists is recoil.

SUPPORT THESE TROOPS
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 01:49 PM
noneof yourbusiness's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,697
Default

You idiots dont know shit. Your powerd by blinad fanaticsism. Your not education or informed enough to refute what I was logicaly.
__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 02:32 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noneof yourbusiness View Post
You idiots dont know shit. Your powerd by blinad fanaticsism. Your not education or informed enough to refute what I was logicaly.
Are you not going to answer Stryker's question, NYOB? You referred to men "on the ground" and said you'd take their opinion over Gen. Petraeus' (I'm not sure where you think he spent the last year or so, but...). Stryker (and I) would like some examples of people whose opinions you value so highly.

...and for God's sake, please proofread your fucking post before submitting it. We'd like to be able to actually read what you post this time, k?

(I have to admit I love your last sentence though. Maybe it's because I'm not "education" enough to understand you, most intelligent one!)
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 02:49 PM
noneof yourbusiness's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Patriot View Post
Are you not going to answer Stryker's question, NYOB? You referred to men "on the ground" and said you'd take their opinion over Gen. Petraeus' (I'm not sure where you think he spent the last year or so, but...). Stryker (and I) would like some examples of people whose opinions you value so highly.

...and for God's sake, please proofread your fucking post before submitting it. We'd like to be able to actually read what you post this time, k?

(I have to admit I love your last sentence though. Maybe it's because I'm not "education" enough to understand you, most intelligent one!)
Stryker is a kid playing dress up. He's no soldier.

Its easy to understand the spell checker making a mistke with a suffix. Id rather be on on my own the rely on that thing, Im not going to spend 20 minutes proofreading shit for you retards. You cant eread it..fine dont respond.


Battalion cmmanders on the gornd have to deal with the situation daily. They are in the thick of it. Their assemts dont match Patreus white washing of it.

Pateaus has literally written the book on Counter insurgency for the Us army and you idiots are stuck in a room full of shit and can't find the door. He was too young for Nam but he wrote about the Influences of Nam on the US Army? Its a fucking bullshit. the dude is a stooge. International Relations and public affiars....Thats his education....A POLITICIAN!!

Stryker and his toy pop gun have no credibilty at all.
__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 04:10 PM
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 4
Default

What was the purpose in posting the article....19,000 killed, thereby recruiting 30,000 more to become *terrorists?* You warmongers never fail to amaze me.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2008, 04:14 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guesswho View Post
What was the purpose in posting the article....19,000 killed, thereby recruiting 30,000 more to become *terrorists?* You warmongers never fail to amaze me.

Especially the fraudulent little pussified trolls like Wowsa.

He'd have you believe he was rambo or something.

While blaming Liberals for his inability to enlist.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2008, 06:57 AM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noneof yourbusiness View Post
Stryker is a kid playing dress up. He's no soldier.

Its easy to understand the spell checker making a mistke with a suffix. Id rather be on on my own the rely on that thing, Im not going to spend 20 minutes proofreading shit for you retards. You cant eread it..fine dont respond.


Battalion cmmanders on the gornd have to deal with the situation daily. They are in the thick of it. Their assemts dont match Patreus white washing of it.

Pateaus has literally written the book on Counter insurgency for the Us army and you idiots are stuck in a room full of shit and can't find the door. He was too young for Nam but he wrote about the Influences of Nam on the US Army? Its a fucking bullshit. the dude is a stooge. International Relations and public affiars....Thats his education....A POLITICIAN!!

Stryker and his toy pop gun have no credibilty at all.
...and at the end of this ignorant post, NYOB has the following: "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."

This is what the anti-war kooks think of us patriots. Remember it. One day we'll probably have to literally fight this scum to save our nation.

As long as they fight like they spell, we have nothing to worry about.

p.s. (Oh yeah, one more thing: I don't use spellcheck. I DON'T HAVE TO.)
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2008, 02:04 PM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noneof yourbusiness View Post
That would be cause there hasnt been
I guess the troops are coming home because they were defeated? LOL
__________________
Drill offshore now
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:02 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: canada
Posts: 5,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow View Post
19,000 insurgents killed in Iraq since '03 - USATODAY.com

19,000 insurgents killed in Iraq since '03

By Jim Michaels, USA TODAY
More than 19,000 militants have been killed in fighting with coalition forces since the insurgency began more than four years ago, according to military statistics released for the first time.

The statistics show that 4,882 militants were killed in clashes with coalition forces this year, a 25% increase over all of last year.

The increase in enemy deaths this year reflects more aggressive tactics adopted by American forces and an additional 30,000 U.S. troops ordered by the White House this year.

MENTAL TOLL: U.S. military faces big hurdles in PTSD care
FUNDING: Defense secretary seeks $42B

U.S. and Iraqi forces launched several large offensives aimed at crippling al-Qaeda since the arrival of more troops starting in February. The U.S. military says, however, there has been an increase in suicide attacks in recent days.
FIND MORE STORIES IN: White House | Baghdad | Senate | al-Qaeda | Iraqi | Shiite | Vietnam War | Muqtada al-Sadr | Sunni | Today | Marine | Najaf | Freedom of Information Act | Gen. John Abizaid | Capt. Michael Greenberger

The size of the insurgency in Iraq has been difficult to measure and is fluid, making it hard to determine what impact the deaths have had on the insurgency in Iraq.

Last year, Gen. John Abizaid, then commander of military forces in the region, estimated the Sunni insurgency to be 10,000 to 20,000 fighters. He said the Shiite militia members were in the "low thousands." The U.S. military hasn't publicly provided any recent estimates.

There are 25,000 detainees in U.S. military custody in Iraq, according to the military. The numbers of enemy killed and detained would exceed the estimate given last year of the size of the insurgency.

Since the insurgency began after Baghdad fell in spring 2003, 19,429 militants have been killed in clashes with coalition forces, statistics show. The numbers do not include enemy killed during the invasion.

The statistics, provided at USA TODAY's request, were retrieved from a coalition database that tracks "significant acts." Militants are identified in the database because they are linked to "hostile action," said Capt. Michael Greenberger, a Freedom of Information Act officer in Baghdad. There is no way to independently verify the data.

"The information in the database is only as good as the information entered into it by operators on the ground at the time," Greenberger said. "Follow-up information to make corrections is done whenever possible."

The U.S. military rarely discusses the numbers of enemy dead, fearful of raising parallels with the Vietnam War when the U.S. military's reliance on "body counts" led to allegations of inflated figures because of political pressure to show results.

"You can't kill them all," Maj. Gen. Benjamin Mixon, commander of the American division responsible for northern Iraq, said in a recent interview.

The insurgency has been a mixture of Sunni groups, such as al-Qaeda, and Shiite militia extremists.

The enemy casualty numbers also reinforce the one-sided nature of battles on occasions when militants attempted to directly confront American forces.

The deadliest month for militants was August 2004 when thousands of militia fighters loyal to Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr clashed with American forces in Najaf in southern Iraq. That month, 1,623 militants were killed. The U.S. military lost 53 troops in fighting during the same time.

The real terrorists live in Israel..It should be the Israelis to be killed.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:39 PM
sovereign_eagle2's Avatar
Political Novice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Patriot View Post
So,what's the point of all these propaganda pictures, Crowley?

Surely you must realize by now that there are those of us who are JUST AS PASSIONATELY for this war as you are against it. We believe in freedom, justice, and the American ideal. We believe that America is EXCEPTIONAL, not EVIL. We believe that any enemy who swears to destroy America must be defeated, even if it means resorting to the horrors of war.

It's called patriotism. It's called courage. It's called LOYALTY to one's nation.
You must understand that Iraq never swore to destroy America. Al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, and the president proposed to go to war with Iraq, who had no link to the terrorist group. However, Bush gave the false impression that Iraq was partners with al-Qaeda in order to get support for a war that he has had interests in since he took office. He told the country that the threat was an al-Qaeda network trained and armed by Saddam. This link turned out to be a myth, and the White House knew it. Just think about it, Saddam would see a terrorist group such as al-Qaeda a threat to his ruling, and al-Qaeda would target Saddam if anything because he represents the kind of secular government they opposed.

President Bush and the White House were told by the CIA and European terrorism investigation teams that there were no connections between the two, but the administration ignored these reports and continued to deceive America. And as a result, we are stuck in an unnecessary war against an opponent that has not posed any kind of immediate threat to us.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings