Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > War in Iraq

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 06:25 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crowonapost View Post
Well of course. At the very beginning it was called Operation Iraqi Freedom.

But they got rid of that very quickly because it was too honest.
It's always been an oil war. Too bad the 'means justify then ends' has shown yet again no matter how one cuts it, evil prevails.

The evil is the death by a thousands paper cuts of little lies & manipulations done over the last 8 years by this administration.

They've said reasons for the invasion was practically everything under the sun other than the obvious. Stable control of the oil spigot in the ME. They wanted Iran as well but because of the pathetic post planing or lack there of they ruined any chances of making that a reality.

So we are faced with a VERY fragile control of these oil fields & no guarantee of it's long term stability.

No matter what our REAL intentions where, we did a piss poor job of carrying it out.

We shall see how this unfolds.
Imagine if Bush had said:

"We are invading Iraq, to create available oil to the world particularly to oil pressed nations like Japan who historically have gone to world war to protect their oil supply. We protect it for them so they don't have to build a Navy and threaten the world again."

If Bush said that would you be happier?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 06:58 PM
CrankyYankee's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernPlanter View Post
Imagine if Bush had said:

"We are invading Iraq, to create available oil to the world particularly to oil pressed nations like Japan who historically have gone to world war to protect their oil supply. We protect it for them so they don't have to build a Navy and threaten the world again."

If Bush said that would you be happier?
Well, I would be a lot happier, because he wouldn't have got his fucking putrid oil war if he had been honest.

And yes, if we had implemented a national ENERGY policy several decades ago, we wouldn't be in Iraq right now....

Fucking pathetic and shortsighted, that is what I consider the legacy of our national oil policy.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 07:41 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyYankee View Post
Well, I would be a lot happier, because he wouldn't have got his fucking putrid oil war if he had been honest.

And yes, if we had implemented a national ENERGY policy several decades ago, we wouldn't be in Iraq right now....

Fucking pathetic and shortsighted, that is what I consider the legacy of our national oil policy.
But if he didn't invade Iraq then Japan's economy would have collapsed by now (Iranian restriction of Japanese oil supply) and thus the global economy would have collapsed.

Would you be happier living in a cardboard box?

But hey...4,400 soldiers wouldn't have died...guess that's a good thing right?

You're right - national energy policy is short sighted, because in the US the market finds solutions...this is not Communist Russia...the government doesn't answer problems but only creates them.

The market has not evolved a solution to oil....YET....so for the time being...we're forced to fight for it.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 07:49 PM
CrankyYankee's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernPlanter View Post
But if he didn't invade Iraq then Japan's economy would have collapsed by now (Iranian restriction of Japanese oil supply) and thus the global economy would have collapsed.

Would you be happier living in a cardboard box?

But hey...4,400 soldiers wouldn't have died...guess that's a good thing right?
.
Maybe it would have collapsed (speculation), but yes, I would prefer to have the US soldiers (and the thousands of dead Iraqi's) home with their families.
I've been homeless in my youth. there are worse things. Such as killing others for money...which you seem to espouse.

Quote:
You're right - national energy policy is short sighted, because in the US the market finds solutions...this is not Communist Russia...the government doesn't answer problems but only creates them.

The market has not evolved a solution to oil....YET....so for the time being...we're forced to fight for it.
"the market" is a human institution, not a natural one. The fact that you cannot fathom another way doesn't mean there isn't one. You are stuck seeing only one path, when there are many.

No, I put people BEFORE money and things. Apparently you do not.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:32 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 539
Default

No it WOULD have collapsed...in Nov. 2007 the Iranians nationalized Japanese oil sources forcing them to get their oil from where?

Iraq!

Iran is notorious for nationalizing other people's oil...(Japan built the infrastructure so why shouldn't they own the oil?)

Japan could not suffer an oil crisis - the US could...so why are we in Iraq? Well to secure other people's oil...so they don't have to....namely Japan.

I come from Viking stock...I as my family members have no quarrel in killing people for money - that's the way of the world...only now we've created a global economy where instead of raids we have hostile take overs, instead of armies we just put someone into ruin by debt and let them starve...

The world turns the same - just not so violently for the "Viking Raiders" of today.

The "market" is (I would argue) a natural institution the same way that humans did not "create" Physics...or Math.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:41 PM
CrankyYankee's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernPlanter View Post
No it WOULD have collapsed...in Nov. 2007 the Iranians nationalized Japanese oil sources forcing them to get their oil from where?

Iraq!

Iran is notorious for nationalizing other people's oil...(Japan built the infrastructure so why shouldn't they own the oil?)

Japan could not suffer an oil crisis - the US could...so why are we in Iraq? Well to secure other people's oil...so they don't have to....namely Japan.

I come from Viking stock...I as my family members have no quarrel in killing people for money - that's the way of the world...only now we've created a global economy where instead of raids we have hostile take overs, instead of armies we just put someone into ruin by debt and let them starve...

The world turns the same - just not so violently for the "Viking Raiders" of today.

The "market" is (I would argue) a natural institution the same way that humans did not "create" Physics...or Math.
Without humans there are no goods or services, no economy....

But the physical universe would remain.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:45 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 539
Default

Would it? Without humans there is theoretically nothing because as far as we know we're the only sentient beings - and existence is the result of living...not simply the act in of itself.

So ... without humans what is there?

We really don't need a religious/philosophical discussion here though the point is that economics has forces that humans do NOT create.

Which is why Command economies fail...because humans are trying to directly control something that is effected by forces that a human does not take into account...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:47 PM
CrankyYankee's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,969
Default

I have Viking blood (along with almost everything else)
as well...

However, the viking world is thankfully one of the past.

Human nature has many facets, I would prefer our culture nourish the positive elements and not the negative.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:55 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 539
Default

Then you're going to get your ass kicked by all the Hitler's in the world...no your views are only available because people like me take up the slack.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:59 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyYankee View Post
Just because you can't think beyond your gas tank doesn't mean that is "all there is"

Laughs....I'm not a Democrat shithead. Unlike YOU I DO think for myself...

You appear to be the one whacking the pud.....
as long as you recognize that we pay less for gas than most people
__________________
You can never dent spiderwebs
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0