You are talking about international relations and not "statism". You are using the term improperly (see Satv's def).

That said, relations between Israel and Palestine are much more an issue of ethnic and religious historical differences which are not going to be fixed by simply “recognizing another state”. Palestinians, along with other Arab states, refuse to recognize Israel as a state; therefore, what is Israel’s incentive to recognize Palestine? Israel has tried to compromise with various peace accords, however, the Arab’s cannot give an inch of ground. There will be no compromise until Palestinians realize that compromise requires a give and take, not just a take.

Isn't intercourse among several sovereign states, a form of "state-ism"? I take the position that states cannot exist without sufficient statism.

The primary difference is that the US, the UN, and Israel recognize Israel as a sovereign state.

Digress from this, your insistance on using the term statism, and making up words like State-ism are gonna leave me no choice but to poke holes in your comprehension of English.

Pick a new word or I will bring it up over and over.

__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman

How does your point of view account for the individualism of the several states, in their severalty? We know individualism exists. If an individual state can exist in nature, then doesn't it follow that a form of state-ism can also exist in nature?

Individual states have a Tenth Amendment.

A US specific example are the relations between the several sovereign states among themselves and general government of the Union.

When did the several sovereign States delegate those rights to the federal government?

The Ninth and Tenth Amendments are included in our Bill of Rights for a reason.

The concept is analogous to a hypothetical federal UN. All of the member States are also nations.

I still haven't heard a good rebuttal to Israel having another stable trading partner in our global economy by simply recognizing one. The US could recognize such a state. If the US did, then UN would probably concur. What reason would Israel have to not want to improve the standard of living of its populace, by engaging in mutually beneficial trade?

An sob takes your house ,your land ,humiliates you,
kills your chidren,demolishes house and then says:
recognize me as your boss and owner and we have
peace.

The simple answer is the Isrealis dont want any peace. Just the water and the land

__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related