Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > U.S. Domestic Policy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2007, 11:08 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,956
Default

"The problem is, few politicians want transparency."

>>>Since we just spent $600,000,000,000 on a war that resulted from a total absence of transparency, I'd think transparency in DC would be a priority item for everybody.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2007, 11:15 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George O Well View Post
"The problem is, few politicians want transparency."

>>>Since we just spent $600,000,000,000 on a war that resulted from a total absence of transparency, I'd think transparency in DC would be a priority item for everybody.
But that is a loss compared to the 10+ "TRILLION" DOLLARS, wasted on social reform that has only brought us an increased crime rate of over 300% and managed to raise the Projected status of someone living in poverty to up to 200% of the "actual" poverty line? As now we are to believe that anyone making 40,000 dollars a year are living in a state of swallow and poverty. A great way to spend the funds that are now being spent on national security.....Like I said, defense first, social waste second. Every dime spent on our military and our nations defense is not waste but peace thru strength.....a concept that the communist have never taken to. BD

Last edited by bluedog; 08-03-2007 at 11:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2007, 11:22 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog View Post
But that is a loss compared to the 10+ "TRILLION" DOLLARS, wasted on social reform that has only brought us and increased crime rate of over 300% and managed to raise the Projected status of someone living in poverty to up to 200% of the "actual" poverty line? As now we are to believe that anyone making 40,000 dollars a year are living in a state of swallow and poverty. A great way to spend the funds that are now being spent on national security.....Like I said, defense first, social waste second. Every dime spent on our military and our nations defense is not waste but peace thru strength.....a concept that the communist have never taken to. BD
Have you ever really looked at why social programs don't work? Could it possibly be because they are given/cut on a whim? Could it be because we don't nurture the one's that will help people out of poverty?

Not every dime spent on our military is peace thru strenghth. That is really naive. I bet you could find alot of waste, overspending, and unfortunately it isn't being spent on our troops.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2007, 11:49 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedomlover View Post
Have you ever really looked at why social programs don't work? Could it possibly be because they are given/cut on a whim? Could it be because we don't nurture the one's that will help people out of poverty?

Not every dime spent on our military is peace thru strenghth. That is really naive. I bet you could find alot of waste, overspending, and unfortunately it isn't being spent on our troops.
My statement just considered the facts as presented. I said that waste is relative to perception.....and I deem it more wasteful to spent our tax monies on programs that have done nothing but keep the status quo, in relation to poverty and actually lost in relation to moral issues surrounding poverty. And again the first and most paramount duty of the federal government is National Security....not the adoption of the state responsibility to care for their citizens at a local level.....where actual needs can be determined and meet. A national social program is just simply to wasteful in management cost and actual helps provided.....in fact just look at the most "successful" program to date....the social security program...a fair and just program, which in theory would work.....if we could keep the politicians from dipping into the funds...a practice that has lead to the "certain" failure of the program unless reform is made....Like I said, there is one and only one thing that the federal government is good at, as it should be because really it is the reason that it was formed.......NATIONAL SECURITY. BD
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2007, 11:24 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,956
Default

"But that is a loss compared to the 10+ "TRILLION" DOLLARS, wasted on social reform that has only brought us an increased crime rate of over 300% and managed to raise the Projected status of someone living in poverty to up to 200% of the "actual" poverty line?"

>>>Without that social spending, you'd be just another headless cake-eating Marie Antoinette.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2007, 11:31 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,956
Default

"Not every dime spent on our military is peace thru strenghth. That is really naive. I bet you could find alot of waste, overspending, and unfortunately it isn't being spent on our troops."

>>>How 'bout those $2,000,000,000 Stealth Bombers that the generals are afraid to fly through a war zone?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2007, 11:38 AM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 14,242
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George O Well View Post
"Not every dime spent on our military is peace thru strenghth. That is really naive. I bet you could find alot of waste, overspending, and unfortunately it isn't being spent on our troops."

>>>How 'bout those $2,000,000,000 Stealth Bombers that the generals are afraid to fly through a war zone?
George, your correct about the waste, but it is nothing new. Every large organization has waste and could run more effienctly.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2007, 02:36 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,956
Default

$2,000,000,000 per bomber x 44 bombers (last I heard) = a whole lot of waste, my friend. Especially when you consider all the ICBMs and Trident submarines we have.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings