Quote:
Originally Posted by cat's meow
Twisted...? You have got to be kidding me. It is not until recent history that there have been any real solid sets of scientific data even regarding all of this.
|
Real solid facts and scientific data? About what? How the facts were perverted that the government used in order to gain control over the sexual re-education of America's children? I lived through it and recall first hand the meetings and all the parents that rejected this new government plan. I was there, you already admitted you were not. There is NO real solid scientific data involved. Only more biased numbers by the same convoluted government that sold it to the people in the first place.
Quote:
|
Raped by TEACHERS!?! What the hell is that? (I smell a Smuggled Premise here). How many overwhelming sets of statistics do you have regarding a mass raping of children by teachers? The reason you did not see this reported much before the 1970s is because it was very taboo to so; even bring these sort so of charges up against authority figures.
|
No it wasn't. There was one case of a teacher making passes at a student when I was in school. Every female student was called in and questioned about whether he had done the same to them. The end result was that the authorities had to move the teacher out of the district in order to prevent the parents from killing him. The only taboo that's been lifted is the one that truly sees justice being served in these cases.
Quote:
|
FYI, the culture has changed to NOT tolerate this sort of abuse. We here about this much more in the news because of the culture changing. More girls are nto gettgin raped, more are getting reported. Not just girls, boys too and yes there are a lot more than there were before teachers stopped teaching academics and started teaching the new morality.
|
For your information we see it in the news a lot more because the teachers don't fear what will happen to them as much as they did 50 years ago. They know the law is there to protect the criminal , not the innocent.
Oh, and I never said "mass rapes" so don't put words in my mouth. But, would you like to see a list that is growing every day? Here's a portion of
The big list
Quote:
|
This is with ALL authority figures, you are assuming way TOO MUCH with what I said. Your premise is way off base.
|
Oh? I don't think so.
Here's another article that's very interesting about a different kind of study that was done by the government. Should we wonder why the results of this study have not hit the mainstream media alonside the results you posted? So much for putting all the "real solid sets of scientific data " out there for the public to see.
New research agrees: Moms do it better
Posted: March 29, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Olivia St. John
How many tax-funded studies are needed before parents comprehend that farming their children's education out to strangers in institutional settings may be harmful to their kids' social skills?
A new report published March 26, derived from the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, exposes alarming results for parents who use day care and the public school system as babysitting services.
Since 1991, researchers with the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development have studied around 1,000 American children kept in "non-maternal child care" from birth through 54 months of age.
While this longitudinal multi-million dollar study on the lives of institutionalized children has been slogging along for 16 years, other researchers have been studying another group of youngsters, namely, those being homeschooled. Oddly enough, all these studies lead to the same logical conclusion: Home is where true childhood socialization is built. If you want a child to act like an animal, then send him to the funny farm commonly known as the public school and day-care system. If you want him to be civilized, teach him at home.