I can't believe I am getting drawn into this stupid debate again but ok....

Russia and Britain had the same intelligence that we did. We all thought that there were WMDS there. To do nothing would have irresponsible. It is still possible that they were moved or destroyed but we all believed they were there. Even the New York Times has admitted that the evidence was there. I don't know why we still have this stupid debate. Oh wait...yes I do. Because liberals can't ever admit they are wrong.

jt there was very scarce evidence but paulson the chief intelligence officer testified that there was 99 to 1 evidence they did not. Weapons inspectors reported they did not have weapons. Paulson reported Bush and cheney only wanted the scantest of evidence and the strongest intelligence said they did not. Canadian inrtelligence said they did not. Russia did not think they had WMD. The only countries that had found evidence were going on the very little found by this administration. Richard Clarke reported it was clear they were no threat. Intelligence was cherry picked to fit an agenda and you are paying for it right now and will be the rest of your life unless you are on welfare.

Anyone else hear that? sounds like sheep to me.

__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall

No, sorry, that just isn't true. We did NOT ALL think there were WMD. The largest public demonstrations in the history of the world occurred prior to the war in an effort to stop it. But again... you Bush defenders can keep rehashing the same very old, very tired very untruthful lies if you like, but it won't stop the truth from coming out. I'm patient.

By the way JJ, somewhere you posted something about not replying to these silly allegations because it would be too much work to refute such silliness... The truth is never work, it takes no effort. What DOES take effort is spinning and twisting the facts. The truth is... you don't have anything to refute the well founded lies, so there is nothing you CAN say.

JohnnyTurk, go visit the "Bush lied..." thread, this has all already been hashed out there. And I believe I still have the last word. There are four outstanding lies that none of you have been able to refute. Have at it.

__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall

wow, great refutation. The funny thing is that millions of people read what HE writes, but almost NO ONE gives a damn what you have to say, including me.

__________________
PROUDLY REVILED BY THE LOONY LEFT SINCE 1999!!!!

"I done told you once you son a bitch I am the best that has ever been."

you liberals make me sick to my stomach.

Ahh yes, we finally agree.

__________________
PROUDLY REVILED BY THE LOONY LEFT SINCE 1999!!!!

"I done told you once you son a bitch I am the best that has ever been."

you liberals make me sick to my stomach.

Care to put that to a poll?

__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall

Who baits the hook now bitch? ROFLMAO you are so easy to string along it's almost not fun anymore... almost.

__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall

OR- No I will not go to the Bush Lied post. Even the New York Times no says that he didn't lie. Every credible news source wnow realized that he didn't lie. This is because of the documents that were recently released prove that there were no lies. Was the intelligence bad? Yes. Were there lies? No. I want to ask you what you would have done in 2002 in the president's place. What would you have done? The only people still claiming that he lied are Air America and the extreme left.

Yes. Will Zogby or AP do it?

Because a poll here is even more meaningless than most polls, if you had any knowledge of statistics you would know that.

__________________
PROUDLY REVILED BY THE LOONY LEFT SINCE 1999!!!!

"I done told you once you son a bitch I am the best that has ever been."

you liberals make me sick to my stomach.