Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > U.S. Domestic Policy
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:19 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,153
Default Dems hate windmill power

Kennedy faces fight on Cape Wind
Key lawmakers oppose his bid to block project

By Rick Klein, Globe Staff | April 27, 2006

WASHINGTON -- As record oil prices turn attention to the need for renewable fuels, momentum is building in Congress to buck Senator Edward M. Kennedy's bid to block the proposed Cape Cod wind energy project, potentially reviving efforts to construct the sprawling windmill farm in Nantucket Sound.


The chairman and the top Democrat on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources committee said yesterday that when the bill Kennedy backs that would effectively halt the wind farm comes up for a vote in the Senate, they will object on procedural grounds. They say they'll argue that a renewable energy project shouldn't be lumped in with a bill governing the Coast Guard.

Meanwhile, a group of rank-and-file House members, worried about the political ramifications of rejecting alternative energy sources while motorists pay $3 a gallon at the gas station, have persuaded House leaders to sidetrack the entire bill for at least several weeks, even though it was slated for action this week. The delay could give supporters of the wind farm time to make their case to members of Congress.

''Are we going to be for developing alternative energy or not?" said Representative Charles Bass, a New Hampshire Republican who helped persuade House leaders to table the bill until at least mid-May. ''The longer you delay it, the longer there is for people to examine the issue, and to determine what's going on here."

The efforts to move the wind farm forward occur amid growing attention to Kennedy's role in the secret, behind-the-scenes maneuvering to stop it. Republican Ted Stevens of Alaska, the senator who inserted the wind-farm provision into the Coast Guard bill, has acknowledged discussing the matter privately with the Massachusetts Democrat.

Environmental groups have launched an aggressive advertising and lobbying campaign to persuade Democrats to abandon Kennedy and back a promising source of renewable energy. If the wind farm becomes a reality, advocates say, it could provide three-fourths of the Cape and Islands' energy needs and could set an example for the nation.

The maneuver to stop the wind farm ''is clearly a backroom deal, and they're going to get called publicly on it," said John Passacantando, executive director of Greenpeace USA. ''The Democrats are going to kill the first big offshore wind farm in the United States because of their relationship with Ted Kennedy."

The 130-turbine, 24-square-mile cluster of windmills would be about 8 miles from Kennedy's home in Hyannis Port, and he has long opposed it. The Coast Guard bill would give Governor Mitt Romney, another wind farm opponent, the power to veto it, even if the project clears all other hurdles.

Kennedy rejected suggestions that he doesn't like the wind farm because it would be near his Cape home, and said the project probably wouldn't be visible from the Kennedy compound. He said he's against the project because it would create a range of environmental and navigational problems and would hurt tourism, one of the area's key industries.
__________________
Environmental profiteering is the biggest threat to the American people.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:50 AM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 13,258
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

Ted wasn't the only Mass offical that is against the wind farm, John Kerry doesn't want it either. It is ok for the elites to keep a prsitine views of land when Joe is having to having to pay more to heat and cool their homes.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 10:35 AM
Teak's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 2,492
Default

I live in one of the most liberal areas, of a very liberal state. When I first proposed installing residential wind turbans and solar panels on my property I met nothing but resistance. It took over three years to finally get the permits for the energy saving modifications. NO ONE WILL EVER CONVINCE ME LIBERALS ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY.
__________________

NONE OF THE ABOVE IN 08.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 11:21 AM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 13,258
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teak View Post
I live in one of the most liberal areas, of a very liberal state. When I first proposed installing residential wind turbans and solar panels on my property I met nothing but resistance. It took over three years to finally get the permits for the energy saving modifications. NO ONE WILL EVER CONVINCE ME LIBERALS ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY.
Then why do we even listen to their enviroment rants? They just want to control the population.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 01:08 PM
Teak's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 2,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob View Post
Then why do we even listen to their enviroment rants? They just want to control the population.
I quit listening to them years ago. My goal is to remove as many from public office as is possible.
__________________

NONE OF THE ABOVE IN 08.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 01:10 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,996
Default

Poole is looking for a job, Teak.

Matbe you can fill a vacated seat with a good conservative like her...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 01:17 PM
mateocafe's Avatar
Political Novice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 1515 Credibility Street
Posts: 10
Default

The Democratic party does not represent "liberals".

"Liberals" would be the people pushing FOR renewable, sensible energy solutions.

The biggest issue among democrats is "he/she is too liberal to be a democrat".

The Democratic party represents the same big money interests that the Republican party does. In rhetoric they sometimes differ, in action they are unified.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 01:26 PM
Teak's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 2,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mateocafe View Post
The Democratic party does not represent "liberals".

"Liberals" would be the people pushing FOR renewable, sensible energy solutions.

The biggest issue among democrats is "he/she is too liberal to be a democrat".

The Democratic party represents the same big money interests that the Republican party does. In rhetoric they sometimes differ, in action they are unified.
Then maybe "liberals" should stop supporting the Dimocant Party.
__________________

NONE OF THE ABOVE IN 08.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 11:47 PM
mulp's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teak View Post
I live in one of the most liberal areas, of a very liberal state. When I first proposed installing residential wind turbans and solar panels on my property I met nothing but resistance. It took over three years to finally get the permits for the energy saving modifications. NO ONE WILL EVER CONVINCE ME LIBERALS ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY.
Well, is that any different than the conservatives who demand deregulation of everything so that business can operate unfettered by government regulation on their pollution, dumping of waste, or unilateral decision making, and then sue everyone under the sun in order to prevent the corporations from setting up in their neighborhood or dumping waste down the road or deny insurance claims based on the corporation's legal power to decide in their own favor?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 11:55 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,996
Default

Maybe teak wanted to fashion his solar-panels as a vertical crucifix, forty feet tall.

Blame it on the Libtard nIMBY's.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings