Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > U.S. Domestic Policy
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 08:03 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 598
Blog Entries: 2
Default The Martial Law Act of 2006

by James Bovard

Martial law is perhaps the ultimate stomping of freedom. And yet, on September 30, 2006, Congress passed a provision in a 591-page bill that will make it easy for President Bush to impose martial law in response to a terrorist “incident.” It also empowers him to effectively declare martial law in response to what he or other federal officials label a shortfall of “public order” – whatever that means.

It took only a few paragraphs in a $500 billion, 591-page bill to raze one of the most important limits on federal power. Congress passed the Insurrection Act in 1807 to severely restrict the president’s ability to deploy the military within the United States. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 tightened those restrictions, imposing a two-year prison sentence on anyone who used the military within the United States without the express permission of Congress. (This act was passed after the depredations of the U.S. military throughout the Southern states during Reconstruction.)
National Sovereignty
__________________
Join the forums, Read the News!
http://waronyou.com


http://RONPAULFORUM.INFO">RON PAUL FORUMS</a>
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 08:20 PM
Teak's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 3,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtyp View Post
by James Bovard

Martial law is perhaps the ultimate stomping of freedom. And yet, on September 30, 2006, Congress passed a provision in a 591-page bill that will make it easy for President Bush to impose martial law in response to a terrorist “incident.” It also empowers him to effectively declare martial law in response to what he or other federal officials label a shortfall of “public order” – whatever that means.

It took only a few paragraphs in a $500 billion, 591-page bill to raze one of the most important limits on federal power. Congress passed the Insurrection Act in 1807 to severely restrict the president’s ability to deploy the military within the United States. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 tightened those restrictions, imposing a two-year prison sentence on anyone who used the military within the United States without the express permission of Congress. (This act was passed after the depredations of the U.S. military throughout the Southern states during Reconstruction.)
National Sovereignty

Another paranoid schizophrenic, fear monger. Yep you're going to fit right in with the neo-nazi skinheads on this forum. You guys have much in common.
__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 03:39 AM
NAT's Avatar
NAT NAT is offline
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teak View Post
Another paranoid schizophrenic, fear monger. Yep you're going to fit right in with the neo-nazi skinheads on this forum. You guys have much in common.
So you've no problem with Dubya having already comprimised 8 of the ten Bill of Rights, and getting this power as well?

Me personally, I would be very concerned placing such power, which totally destabilizes the Balance of Power among the three governmental branches, in the hands of a man who didn't give it a second thought to spy on each and every US citizen without court oversight. Dubya simply has no concern for the Constitution, nor the individual rights and privlages of a US citizen.

To erase even one line of the Constitution erases the United States of America. Our Founding Document IS the US of A, and should be upheld through all times of conflict and natural disaster.

History just may damn well repeat itself. National cemetaries across the north contain many innocent people from the Civil War era, imprisoned in POW camps with no due procees when Lincoln suspended Habeus Corpus.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 04:44 AM
Teak's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 3,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT View Post
So you've no problem with Dubya having already comprimised 8 of the ten Bill of Rights, and getting this power as well?

Me personally, I would be very concerned placing such power, which totally destabilizes the Balance of Power among the three governmental branches, in the hands of a man who didn't give it a second thought to spy on each and every US citizen without court oversight. Dubya simply has no concern for the Constitution, nor the individual rights and privlages of a US citizen.

To erase even one line of the Constitution erases the United States of America. Our Founding Document IS the US of A, and should be upheld through all times of conflict and natural disaster.

History just may damn well repeat itself. National cemetaries across the north contain many innocent people from the Civil War era, imprisoned in POW camps with no due procees when Lincoln suspended Habeus Corpus.
Name one right you have lost since "dubya" took office. Show me where YOU have been affected by this supposed violation of the constitution.

You are just another paranoid nut job like these others. Birds of a feather.....
__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 05:06 AM
NAT's Avatar
NAT NAT is offline
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teak View Post
Name one right you have lost since "dubya" took office. Show me where YOU have been affected by this supposed violation of the constitution.

You are just another paranoid nut job like these others. Birds of a feather.....
Oh look, everyone, a perfect example of VLS.
That's Verbal Lemming Syndrom, BTW.
Have you even READ our Constitution? Good heavens, I can't believe there are still people this blinded.

The only Bill of Rights that has not been comprimised directly by this administration as of yet is the Third. This president is also responsible for the worst erosion of the Balance of Powers in history, approaching the realm of absolute power for the Adminstration Branch, dictatorship in other words.

Have I been directly effected? Yes I have, and so have you, and everyone else who has made a phone call or used the internet in the past 7 years.
Were you aware that a police officer could arrest you and hold you for 72 hours with no phonecall or official charges levied? That you could be ripped from your home for saying the wrong thing on this forum, and thrown in a military prison without due process and no recourse? Are you aware that our Constitution guarentees Jusdicial oversight (warrents) were eavedropping is concerned?

Soviet much?

Our Founders laid down certain procedures and rights in our Constitution, laws that also laid the foundation for this very nation, laws that created these United States of America, laws that were NOT to be comprimised. Not since Eisenhower and his Motto has the Constitution been dragged through the mud so much.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 05:12 AM
itsplayed's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stuck in the Middle of Looney Lefties and Radical Righties, USA
Posts: 1,234
Default

Quote:
Have I been directly effected? Yes I have, and so have you, and everyone else who has made a phone call or used the internet in the past 7 years.
Were you aware that a police officer could arrest you and hold you for 72 hours with no phonecall or official charges levied? That you could be ripped from your home for saying the wrong thing on this forum, and thrown in a military prison without due process and no recourse? Are you aware that our Constitution guarentees Jusdicial oversight (warrents) were eavedropping is concerned?
If true, this forum would be a lot lighter. Show me one case where this has happened.
__________________
"Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah." ~ Qur'an:8:39

Muslims aren't dying from war....they're being murdered by members of their own cult.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 05:13 AM
wvpeach's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Virginia ( Gods Country)
Posts: 4,437
Default

Good post dirty P


NAT

I see you met Teak , one of our resident Bush bots.

Ah, well you'll notice we have a lot of sheep's who don't mind being slaves to the government around here. Teak is just one of them. But let me forewarn you Bush Bots like Teak haven't got a lick of sense , so talking to Teak is like talking to the wall.



But good to have you here NAT, welcome to the forum.
__________________
Real Christians Don't Support Preemptive War



Life is not about counting the number of breaths you take , life is about the moments that take your breath away.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 05:22 AM
NAT's Avatar
NAT NAT is offline
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsplayed View Post
If true, this forum would be a lot lighter. Show me one case where this has happened.
Cute, ask for proof of something that would catagorically NOT be released to the media.

No, I cannot offer such proof, I do not have access to any documents that would certainly be classified. Sorry.

I would hope you would be aware, and I am sure you are, that such partisan spin you use is designed to detract from the core issue.

Our Constitution has been comprimised.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 05:27 AM
itsplayed's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stuck in the Middle of Looney Lefties and Radical Righties, USA
Posts: 1,234
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT View Post
Cute, ask for proof of something that would catagorically NOT be released to the media.

No, I cannot offer such proof, I do not have access to any documents that would certainly be classified. Sorry.

I would hope you would be aware, and I am sure you are, that such partisan spin you use is designed to detract from the core issue.

Our Constitution has been comprimised.
What.....no family members of the wrongfully accused and "illegally" held are speaking out?

Take each line item then.....what part of the Patriot act do you feel has comprimised the Constitution and your rights?

Please don't spin from the ACLU website.
__________________
"Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah." ~ Qur'an:8:39

Muslims aren't dying from war....they're being murdered by members of their own cult.

Last edited by itsplayed : 04-18-2008 at 05:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 05:56 AM
Teak's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 3,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wvpeach View Post
Good post dirty P


NAT

I see you met Teak , one of our resident Bush bots.

Ah, well you'll notice we have a lot of sheep's who don't mind being slaves to the government around here. Teak is just one of them. But let me forewarn you Bush Bots like Teak haven't got a lick of sense , so talking to Teak is like talking to the wall.



But good to have you here NAT, welcome to the forum.
I'm still waiting for 5 answers to the questions about your socialist medical program, Pit.

1. Who specifically is going to administer this program?

Ans. by Peach: The states by electing a board of half doctors and half laymen.

2. How many people will it take, to administer this program for 300 million plus people?



3. How much is it going to cost to cover a husband, wife, one son 8 years of age, and one daughter 16 years old?



4. How much is it going to cost the American tax payer, to implement this program, and run it for two years?



5. How much will it cost to run and implement this program each year after that, including the retirement packages, for the administrators?



6. How is this program going to provide, the majority of Americans, with BETTER health care?


COME ON GIRL, YOU SAID THE ANSWER WERE IN THE TRIPE YOU POSTED. PROVIDE THEM
__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings