test
 |
|

09-02-2007, 09:01 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fort Lewis, WA
Posts: 2,302
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Fatts
With all due respect, democrats are pro oil, too. 
|
And considering that some democrats are from areas that manufacture automobiles, it is safe to say that they are pro-american auto manufaturing as well.
__________________
"A committee is a group of people who individually can do nothing but together can decide that nothing can be done."
Fred Allen
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."
George Bernard Shaw
"Politics is the art of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable."
John Galbraith
|

09-03-2007, 06:55 AM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,425
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Fatts
With all due respect, democrats are pro oil, too. 
|
Well yes, but as long as they drill in someone elses yard. 
__________________
I love to relax by shooting cans.........AfriCANS, MexiCANS, Puerto RiCANS.................
|

09-03-2007, 10:48 AM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,167
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie Parker
Well, let me ask you this...with republicans being so pro oil, just how do you think you're going to get cars which use less oil at a price everyone can afford?
|
It already it, oil is cheap.
|

09-03-2007, 11:33 AM
|
|
Political Guru
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 641
|
|
It doesn't feel cheap when your paying more that double the price it was 10 years ago. Plus higher prices for everything else because of shipping costs.
Another Bush supportin' moron.
|

09-03-2007, 12:17 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,167
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seeker
It doesn't feel cheap when your paying more that double the price it was 10 years ago. Plus higher prices for everything else because of shipping costs.
Another Bush supportin' moron.
|
It feels cheap when you’re paying less than you were 28 years ago and the fact that a gallon of gasoline is cheaper than bottled water and ice cream when you adjust gallon for gallon.
|

09-03-2007, 12:35 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,483
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Fatts
With all due respect, democrats are pro oil, too. 
|
Really? Well, when Carter tried to wean this nation off oil, the people got pissed.
No, I'd say the history and legacy of Reagan, Bush and Bush shows oil men support republicans....imperialistic republicans to be exact... 
|

09-03-2007, 12:36 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,483
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote
It feels cheap when you’re paying less than you were 28 years ago and the fact that a gallon of gasoline is cheaper than bottled water and ice cream when you adjust gallon for gallon.
|
How is that true?
When you look at hourly wages and cost of living, taking out what necessities cost per percentage of take home pay now versus then, American families need both parents working or one parent working two jobs just to stay ahead of the necessities in this economy....where do you come up with your statement?
|

09-03-2007, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,483
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote
It already it, oil is cheap.
|
At the highest per gallon rate of import we have seen? how do you figure?
|

09-03-2007, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,483
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdfather02
And considering that some democrats are from areas that manufacture automobiles, it is safe to say that they are pro-american auto manufaturing as well.
|
Wow.....where is that, pray tell.
|

09-03-2007, 12:58 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie Parker
How is that true?
When you look at hourly wages and cost of living, taking out what necessities cost per percentage of take home pay now versus then, American families need both parents working or one parent working two jobs just to stay ahead of the necessities in this economy....where do you come up with your statement?
|
You have inobservantly hit the proverbial nail on the head. Several years ago, the source of income for the American family was a "single" provider, usually the male...with the lady staying home to "properly" attend to the nurturing needs of their offspring. But with the so called "women's movement"....more and more women left the shelter of the home to "seek" employment and "prove" their independence. The only problem with that situation when it happened in mass, as such was the case......the good earning jobs were filled by a moderate percentage of women, thus resulting in some families having "two" income earners and perhaps their neighbor having lost their job because the ladies had filled the position once held by the men only.......Now sad to say we have a situation...whereas, both parents have to work at lower paying jobs to take the place of the one provider. It indeed is sad but true. You have a household were both are making in excess what one used to make and in the same neighborhood you have a "man" who's family depend on him to provide and despite the fact that he has years of experience, he can not find employment....the womans rights movement have taken the jobs. And it is not only our economy that is suffering but our family institutions as well...with no one at home to teach them family values our crime rights has risen some 300%........from the time we first heard our women "ROAR". So one must conclude that women are the heart and soul of the American system of Values.....for without their guiding hand holding the torch as home.....our nation has slipped into a state of immorality. BD
Last edited by bluedog; 09-03-2007 at 01:02 PM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|