Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Terrorism

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-07-2006, 03:06 PM
RASTAMAN's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,741
Default Nationalism, Not Islam, Motivates Most Suicide Terrorists

Published on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 by The Morning Call (Allentown, Pennsylvania)

Nationalism, Not Islam, Motivates Most Suicide Terrorists

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0905-21.htm

by Gary Olson

Here is today's discussion question: Suicide terrorism is primarily caused by Islamic fundamentalism. True or false? Although it seems counter-intuitive, especially given everything we read and hear in the mainstream media, the correct answer is ''false.''

In his recent book, ''DYING TO WIN: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism,'' University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape has provided an indispensable public service by collecting data from all 315 suicide terrorist campaigns from 1980 to 2003, involving 462 individuals. His overall finding: The major objective of 95 percent of suicide attacks is to expel foreign military forces from territory that the terrorists perceive as their homeland. There is little connection with Islamic fundamentalism or any of the world religions. The taproot of suicide terrorism is nationalism and it's ''mainly a response to foreign occupation.'' The objective is political self-determination. The Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, a secular, clearly anti-religious movement, have committed 76 of the 315 suicide attacks, the most of any group. Their specific goal was an independent homeland in Sri Lanka. Pape, who has also taught at the U.S. Air Force's Advanced Airpower Studies, convincingly demonstrates that ''suicide terrorist groups are neither primarily criminal groups dedicated to enriching their top leaders, nor religious cults isolated from the rest of their society. Rather, suicide terrorist organizations often command broad social support within the national communities from which they recruit, because they are seen as pursuing legitimate nationalist goals.'' Absent these goals, suicide terrorism rarely occurs.

Only 6 percent of the perpetrators have come from the five countries with the world's largest Islamic fundamentalist populations. (Pakistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Iran and Nigeria). He notes, ''Prior to America's invasion in March 2003, Iraq had never experienced a suicide bombing in its history.'' Further, Pape's demographic profiles of individual suicide terrorists reveals they are not uneducated, poor, mentally unstable, lacking in prospects, or young men expecting to spend paradise in the company of 72 virgins. Almost exactly the opposite is true. The data indicates they have higher incomes, intelligence and education, are deeply integrated into their communities, are highly politically conscious and from widely varied religious backgrounds. A significant minority are female.

Obviously, killing innocents is a morally repugnant act, but the evidence also strongly suggests that these individuals are motivated by a deep sense of duty and view their actions as a sacrifice for a nation's common good, its culture and community goals. Reprehensible, of course. But not caused by religious fervor. Although suicide attacks account for only 3 percent of terrorist incidents, they account for 48 percent of all fatalities. Clearly it's the most deadly manifestation of terrorism and there is every reason to suspect it will increase. It works.

Placing tens of thousands of U.S. troops in the Arabian Peninsula between 1990 and 2001 was the pivotal factor accounting for the Sept. 11 attacks. Pape concludes that given the high correlation between foreign military occupation and suicide terrorist movements, the continued and hated presence of American troops in the region will greatly facilitate terrorist organizers in recruiting fresh volunteers.

My own take is that here we get to the nub of the matter. U.S. military might is concentrated in this region for one reason: He who controls the world's energy resources, especially scarce oil resources, controls the world. He also becomes fabulously wealthy. Permanent military bases in Iraq are crucial to realizing their ends. How much easier, and necessary, for U.S. planners to deceive our citizens that Iraq and all the rest is about a ''war on terrorism'' related to Islamic fundementalism than to reveal the truth about their motives. They're well aware that an enlightened American public would refuse to give our nation's blessing, blood, and treasure to such a nefarious enterprise.

The so-called ''war on terror'' is fatally flawed because its planners are incapable of addressing the real political goals of those employing terrorism. They can't afford to do so. Precious little time remains to reverse a U.S. course of action that virtually guarantees a significant uptick in deadly attacks on Americans, both here and abroad.

Gary Olson, Ph.D., is chair of the Political Science Department at Moravian College in Bethlehem. His e-mail address is olson@moravian.edu.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-07-2006, 03:18 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,701
Default

If that is true, then how can the fact that British citizens have committed acts of terror and have tried to commit others be explained? I am sure that some may be motivated by nationalism, but there are a great deal motivated by Islam.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 06:50 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
Default

i didn't know islam was a nation
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 07:26 AM
sour_claw's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belize
Posts: 2,056
Default

I have always had trouble blaming religion in general for fighting. The individual usually already is "prime" for action, and uses anything to justify their actions.
__________________
FREE THE SHEEPLE!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 08:10 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 5,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sour_claw View Post
I have always had trouble blaming religion in general for fighting. The individual usually already is "prime" for action, and uses anything to justify their actions.
more people have died in the name religion than anything else in history. But as anything we see now and probobaly in the past. Religion is used as a political tool.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 08:29 AM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 14,265
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gixaholic View Post
more people have died in the name religion than anything else in history. But as anything we see now and probobaly in the past. Religion is used as a political tool.
Gix, I beleive that you are correct on this. It is sad that people will kill in the name of relegion but of course they do.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 10:28 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: toledo ohio
Posts: 582
Default

I don't hear main stream Islam denouncing terrorist,I don't see Allah
striking terrorist dead,Islam has to take some of the blame for its followers!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 10:34 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,963
Default

''Prior to America's invasion in March 2003, Iraq had never experienced a suicide bombing in its history.''

>>>THAT'S interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 10:49 AM
Areyouforreal's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cowtown, Texas
Posts: 7,417
Default

Probably because they were a terroristic nation. Why would a terroristic state bomb itself?
__________________
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp92vkXcC0w
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2006, 10:52 AM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 14,265
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Areyouforreal View Post
Probably because they were a terroristic nation. Why would a terroristic state bomb itself?
Does anybody think that Saddam had everybody too scared to do anything.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings