You are still showing your ignorance. Nietzsche never called for the breeding of a master race or killing misfits. Your continual repeating of these lies only shows how little you know about anything.

As for Darwin, again you are ignorant. Darwin's methodology has pretty much stood the test of time, he was one of the greatest scientific observers of all time. That you haven't cared to read his works and discover how truly great his reasoning was merely again shows your ignorance on the subject.

Actually, evolution says that people with dark skin are superbly adapted to the majority of the earth's surface, and those with white skin represent a group of people who didn't have the mental skills required to find the foods that their body needs, so they regressed to bring plant like attributes back to dominance so they could synthesize needed nutrients like plants do.

Clearly those with white skin are the abnormal evolutionary product, and evolution makes it pretty clear that, while unique forms of life might adapt to local conditions, such highly adapted forms are most likely to fail to survive any change in their environment. White people really need to be seen as some strange branch in evolution that should be preserved because they might have some genetic trait that might offer some future benefit to the darker, more robust, dark skinned people.

Black people might need to plan for the future when white people are threatened with extinction from climate change. If the climate warms, white people will really begin to have a hard time surviving and reproducing. Clearly white people are white to blend in with snow, but if the earth warms, the snow will go away, the white people will become easy prey. Black people might find they have a moral or scientific mandate to set up zoos or nature preserves in which white people can survive, with the aid of black zoologists.

After all, we can expect that eventually a new ice age will begin, and the dominant black people at that time might help society adapt by cross breeding the whites in the zoos with blacks to see if some of the traits of white can be introduced into the human population.

Do you actually believe this, or are you taking a piss at him. If so, nevermind.

;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)

Thought so :-) But on this board you never know!!!

If black folks are only two-thirds developed, what's Obama? about four-fifths?

Even more puzzling...where does Crowley, Petey, Icey and Cannuck fall on the scale?

Thats it CUM-MISSIONER

Continue being an IGNORER

You're a one man band with a deaf audience


Did ya ever just think that I Dont give a fuck?

__________________

Hey Petey, how much longer you figure you can keep posting before you have to clean your cum off your screen?

I'm in the mob and i'm gonna rub out the cum-missioner.


I know this is only a dream but you're gonna kiss my ring bitch!

(I'm Al & you're Marcy)


Are you ready to fight for your country yet?

__________________

The greatest influence in the sudden development of racism in the 19th century Europe was the replacement of the Christian belief that "God created all people equal" by "Darwinism". By suggesting that man had evolved from more primitive creatures, and that some races had evolved further than others, it provided racism with a scientific mask.

In short, Darwin is the father of racism. His theory was taken up and commented on by such 'official' founders of racism as Arthur Gobineau and Houston Stewart Chamberlain, and the racist ideology which emerged was then put into practice by the Nazis and other fascists. James Joll, who spent long years as a professor of history at universities such as Oxford, Stanford, and Harvard, explained the relationship between Darwinism and racism in his book Europe Since 1870, which is still taught as a textbook in universities:

Charles Darwin, the English naturalist whose books On the Origin of Species, published in 1859, and The Descent of Man, which followed in 1871, launched controversies which affected many branches of European thought… The ideas of Darwin, and of some of his contemporaries such as the English philosopher Herbert Spencer, …were rapidly applied to questions far removed from the immediate scientific ones… The element of Darwinism which appeared most applicable to the development of society was the belief that the excess of population over the means of support necessitated a constant struggle for survival in which it was the strongest or the 'fittest' who won. From this it was easy for some social thinkers to give a moral content to the notion of the fittest, so that the species or races which did survive were those morally entitled to do so.

The doctrine of natural selection could, therefore, very easily become associated with another train of thought developed by the French writer, Count Joseph-Arthur Gobineau, who published an Essay on the Inequality of Human Races in 1853. Gobineau insisted that the most important factor in development was race; and that those races which remained superior were those which kept their racial purity intact. Of these, according to Gobineau, it was the Aryan race which had survived best… It was.. Houston Stewart Chamberlain who contributed to carrying some of these ideas a stage further… Hitler himself admired the author (Chamberlain) sufficiently to visit him on his deathbed in 1927.

__________________
Obama was appointed by elitists, he is an illegitimate candidate.