Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Terrorism
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:48 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 637
Default All nations have terrorists

Our reign of terror, by the Israeli army - Middle East, World - The Independent

All nations have terrorists. Some wear uniforms some are organized groups. the bottom line is all nations have some terrorists and so to point the finger at just some nations is wrong. Some are obvious like pakistan and others are barely mentioned in american media.

Our reign of terror, by the Israeli army - Middle East, World - The Independent
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:10 PM
The Waylander's Avatar
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Default

.....................Silliness.

You have terrorists in every country - sure.

You do not have state sponsored terrorism in every country.

You do not have state sponsored media promoting and glorifying terrorism in every country.

You do not have state sponsored religion promoting and glorifying terrorism in every country.

Now imagine the ones that meet all three criteria, and you''ll be in the right ballpark if it is clue you seek.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 10:18 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Waylander View Post
.....................Silliness.

You have terrorists in every country - sure.

You do not have state sponsored terrorism in every country.

You do not have state sponsored media promoting and glorifying terrorism in every country.

You do not have state sponsored religion promoting and glorifying terrorism in every country.

Now imagine the ones that meet all three criteria, and you''ll be in the right ballpark if it is clue you seek.
Israel and Palestine would be a correct answer to all your questions.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:22 AM
noneof yourbusiness's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Waylander View Post
.....................Silliness.

You have terrorists in every country - sure.

You do not have state sponsored terrorism in every country.

You do not have state sponsored media promoting and glorifying terrorism in every country.

You do not have state sponsored religion promoting and glorifying terrorism in every country.

Now imagine the ones that meet all three criteria, and you''ll be in the right ballpark if it is clue you seek.
yeah thats silly allright.

State sponsored terror is a matter of perception. IN most of the world America is the largest sponsor of state terror. Lots of it is based on religion for most redneck American fanatics.


IN terms of American foreign policy terrorists should only denote a religious fanatic committing a violent act.
Some freaks try to give everybody a terrorists label for all sorts of reason even Political adversary's and common criminals a. Not that violent crime isn't terrifying. Just that for clarity with the Americans terrorists should be reserved to religious nut bags. Though most bigots will make outright remarks about Muslims or try to infer with small little bulleted lists that only Muslims are terrorists. While all fanatic monotheistic religions have terrorists.
__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:49 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,559
Default

Lots of it is based on religion for most redneck American fanatics.
Like Jimmy Carter?
__________________
Americans want nuclear power now!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:36 AM
wibblyesq's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 281
Default

Terrorism is just a word.

For the US soldiers in vietnam, the kids with bombs were terrorists, for the vietnamese, they were freedom fighters. To the british, the american revolutionaries were terrorists (they didn't fight fair, never face to face), to the americans they were freedom fighters. To the russian army, the muhajadeen were terrorists, to americans they were freedom fighters.

Do you see where I'm going with this?

Terrorism is just a word, and words have different meanings in different contexts.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:48 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibblyesq View Post
Terrorism is just a word.

For the US soldiers in vietnam, the kids with bombs were terrorists, for the vietnamese, they were freedom fighters. To the british, the american revolutionaries were terrorists (they didn't fight fair, never face to face), to the americans they were freedom fighters. To the russian army, the muhajadeen were terrorists, to americans they were freedom fighters.

Do you see where I'm going with this?

Terrorism is just a word, and words have different meanings in different contexts.
Terrorism is a tactic, nothing more.
It's rather difficult to say the US military are terrorists, when they do not use terrorism tactics.
__________________
Americans want nuclear power now!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:36 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibblyesq View Post
Terrorism is just a word.

For the US soldiers in vietnam, the kids with bombs were terrorists, for the vietnamese, they were freedom fighters. To the british, the american revolutionaries were terrorists (they didn't fight fair, never face to face), to the americans they were freedom fighters. To the russian army, the muhajadeen were terrorists, to americans they were freedom fighters.

Do you see where I'm going with this?

Terrorism is just a word, and words have different meanings in different contexts.
excellent post and also it should be reminded that if a group does not have an organized military then they are terrorist when they fight for their rights.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:24 PM
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 25
Default

Those abortion clinic blower upers definetly aren't terrorists!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2008, 04:49 AM
wibblyesq's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow View Post
Terrorism is a tactic, nothing more.
It's rather difficult to say the US military are terrorists, when they do not use terrorism tactics.
When did I state they were terrorists (though carpet bombing is a pretty nasty way of getting a message across)?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings