Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Terrorism

Your Ad Here
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2008, 12:19 AM
migueld's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: on Earth...
Posts: 2,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryPacifist View Post
how many of you tools, read the whole fucking resolution??? it makes a virtually powerless committee, to do research and investigation into homegrown terrorism... there is also a lengthy part prohibiting the perversion of civil liberties you can't be scared of everything
Yea?...and they report their findings to congress which will capitulate and send another knife into our backs. This whole bullshit needs to stop ASAP and you, me every-fuckin-body needs to write, call and e mail our reps and let them know...we ani't taken this no more!

see illustration below!

__________________
"People have so manipulated the concept of freedom, that it finally boils down to the right of the stronger and richer to take from the weaker and poorer whatever they have left."
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2008, 12:26 PM
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4
Default

check out this interesting new study on how American's view muslims.

What a Difference a Shawl Makes

- Perceptions Differ of Woman With and Without a Shawl on her Head -

FLEMINGTON, N.J., Jan. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- A new national study of more
than 600 Americans revealed that a woman wearing a shawl or hijab,
typically worn by Muslim women, is viewed significantly different than thesame woman without the traditional headwear.

The study was conducted by HCD Research, using its mediacurves.com web
site during January 2-3, to determine whether Americans possess different
views of a woman based on whether or not she wears traditional Muslim
headwear.

Participants were divided into two randomly assigned groups. Members of
each group were asked to view one of two separate photos of an attractive
young woman. Neither photo was identified in any way. Each sample was then
asked identical questions about the woman, her age, perceived personality,
activities, and how acceptable she might be as a neighbor.

One-third of participants indicated that they would rather have the
woman with the traditional headwear live in another place, another city,
and maybe out of the U.S., as opposed to living in their neighborhood.
However, a clear majority of participants (89%) reported that the woman
without the shawl would be welcome in their neighborhood.

The woman with the shawl on her head was perceived as somewhat older,
and somewhat better off financially than the woman without the shawl. While
the woman with the shawl was more likely to be a stay at home mother, the
woman without the shawl might be a working married woman.

The woman with the shawl on her head was also viewed as much more
traditional than the woman without the shawl. Participants also indicated
that the woman with the shawl was strict and rigid, a good wife and devoted
mother. She was also perceived as keeping to herself or a tight circle of
people. Conversely, the woman without the shawl was perceived to be lively,
friendly, and humorous. She was also viewed as a person who "always looks
at the bright side" and might even be the life of the party.

Overwhelmingly, both photos of the woman were viewed as being
attractive. However, more people thought the woman with the shawl was
beautiful, and both women were seen as trustworthy.

At the end of the questionnaire, the participants specifically
identified the woman with the shawl on her head as Middle-Eastern in origin
and a Muslim; the woman without the shawl was perceived as an American and
a Catholic (maybe Protestant or Jewish).

For detailed information on this study, please go to
mediacurves.com The Media Curves web site provides the media and
general public with a venue to view Americans' perceptions of popular and
controversial media events and advertisements.

Headquartered in Flemington, NJ, the company's services include
traditional and web-based communications research. For additional
information on HCD Research, access the company's web site at hcdi.net
or call HCD Research at 908-788-9393.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2008, 12:28 PM
ONEWHITEDUCK's Avatar
ONEWHITEDUCK
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 16,223
Default

Now This Clown Is A Spammer
__________________
If you don't KNOW where you come from...you WILL wind up going nowhere.

That goes for Ideas, institutions as well as individuals :-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUncnWxjUXM

PSI TECH INVESTIGATIONS and LAW ENFORCEMENT
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 10:32 AM
migueld's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: on Earth...
Posts: 2,089
Default Letter from Carl Levin about HR 1959

Thank you for contacting me regarding the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act (S.1959). I appreciate hearing your views on this matter.

As you may know, S.1959 was introduced by Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) in response to a Senate Homeland Security Committee investigation into domestic radicalization. This bill would establish a National Commission on the Prevention of Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism to examine and report the facts regarding and the causes of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence in the United States. The commission also would study techniques used by foreign nations to prevent this type of radicalization and terrorism and would report its findings to the president and to Congress.

S.1959 also would direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a university-based Center of Excellence for the Study of Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism. This center would assist homeland security officials in preventing violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism in the United States.

Some have expressed concern that this bill could allow an over-aggressive government to infringe on civil rights and privacy while attempting to fight terrorism. Proponents of the bill indicate that it would expressly direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure that any activities to prevent ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism do not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. S. 1959 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs for further consideration.

While we must give law enforcement and intelligence agencies the tools they need to investigate and prevent terrorist activity, I believe we can and that we must do so under the law and our Constitution protecting the rights of Americans.

I will keep you thoughts in mind as the Committee considers this legislation. Thank you again for contacting me.

Sincerely,
Carl Levin
__________________
"People have so manipulated the concept of freedom, that it finally boils down to the right of the stronger and richer to take from the weaker and poorer whatever they have left."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings