40 reasons not to doubt the "official story" of 9/11

noneof yourbusiness · #61 (**permalink**) 06-04-2007, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dom1

An example of the firemen knowing that WTC7 was going to collapse well before it collapsed.

http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/9.../gz/boyle.html

There are other statements by other firemen saying the same thing. One fireman even says that they decided to pull all the firemen out of the building because they knew it was unstable and was going to collapse. Boyle talks about the gaping hole in the side of the building.

youve pulled that BS link before yet the video of these men from that day show no firemen said anything to that effect until the thing was already in pieces falling.

creamdreamof2 · #62 (**permalink**) 08-27-2007, 11:11 AM

zeitgeistmovie dot com watch the whole thing. it starts out strange and slow but its supposed to.

satv365 · #63 (**permalink**) 09-04-2007, 05:19 PM

http://www.geocities.com/tetrahedronomega/index.htm

Operation Northwoods. The Government has planned to do it before. I do not know personally who cause 911. My personal beleif is blowback from broken American Foreign Policy.

But enjoy the declassified document.

satv365 · #64 (**permalink**) 09-11-2007, 09:26 AM

I find it assinine that anyone would beleive the official story. I do not personally believe it was an "inside job" howevor I have no doubt the government lied and continues to lie about how it realy went down.

The government has a track record of keeping secrets from us. They do it for very assinine and sometimes important reasons. Important to them anyhow.

Id personally like to see the government open up the investigatin again. So as to know what realy went down instead of this slap together way they went about it.

To reinforce the lieing to the people. Look up Operation Northwoods. They blatantly planned to kill Americans to get us behind an invasion of Cuba. So I can understand the people who think the Government was complicent here, granted the investigation was half assed, ill put together and full of hole regarding 911.

Debunk the facts instead of going after the idealogy, folks.

Moggy · #65 (**permalink**) 09-12-2007, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by satv365

I find it assinine that anyone would beleive the official story. I do not personally believe it was an "inside job" howevor I have no doubt the government lied and continues to lie about how it realy went down.

The government has a track record of keeping secrets from us. They do it for very assinine and sometimes important reasons. Important to them anyhow.

Id personally like to see the government open up the investigatin again. So as to know what realy went down instead of this slap together way they went about it.

To reinforce the lieing to the people. Look up Operation Northwoods. They blatantly planned to kill Americans to get us behind an invasion of Cuba. So I can understand the people who think the Government was complicent here, granted the investigation was half assed, ill put together and full of hole regarding 911.

Debunk the facts instead of going after the idealogy, folks.

Yes I have read about operation northwoods, and how they planned to commit terrorist attacks within the US, then blame it on Cuba, this is old but has been forgotten. JFK disagreed on the whole scam, a few months later he was shot. Hmmm... Maybe Gwb didnt want to be the next assinated president.

Joe_King · #66 (**permalink**) 09-12-2007, 05:36 AM

The main thing I want to know ...

the photo's of the pentagon (that I have seen) show a cylindrical impact area.

where is the evidence that wings hit the building?

Is it possible that an Andrews AFB blunder in the Pentagon? ... and not a plane?

just tossing a little BS in the air ...

but ... all of a sudden (planes that are not typically armed with missiles) there are less than seasoned fighter pilots scrambling to defend DC and one little oops and an anti aircraft missile gets launched right into the pentagon ...

IMO - that would be something to cover up!

to me Human error is plausible - people get nervous and jerky
Especially when defending a nation means that there may be a potential attack on Washington DC

It would be horrid if people thought that friendly fire hit DC!

Joe_King · #67 (**permalink**) 09-12-2007, 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moggy

Yes I have read about operation northwoods, and how they planned to commit terrorist attacks within the US, then blame it on Cuba, this is old but has been forgotten. JFK disagreed on the whole scam, a few months later he was shot. Hmmm... Maybe Gwb didnt want to be the next assinated president.

If that is the case ...

then who is REALLY controlling the DC puppet?