 |
|

06-03-2007, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,429
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by justme
Lets talk about whos dumber'n shit, dipwad.
Not having been in the Air Force, I don't know the procedures required for getting a fighter jet armed and into the air. I'm sure, though, that you are intimately aware of all the procedures and requirements. And if not, you'll just make shit up.
Are armed fighters just sitting there on the tarmac at Andrews just waiting to go?
If not, it probably takes more than 5 minutes to make it happen. So, fuckface, would it still be feasible to have armed fighters in the air, over DC, with designated targets within your own designated 1 hour time frame?
Interestingly enough, you don't even try to continue the story line of your refuted tin-foil conspiracy shit.
Thats ok, you showed you were defeated when you had to start the name-calling.
Now, if you had said "...why weren't there planes defending DC and other major cities IMMEDIATELY after the first plane hit the tower...." , it would be different. I wonder the same thing.
|
LMAO... YES, THEY ARE sitting on the tarmac ready to go... every G8 country does... and it DOESN"T take much more than five minutes for them to be airborn. You don't get to superpower status without being able to intercept immediately. We also have AWAC and command flight centers in the air 24 hours a day in many parts of the world to emulate our ability to scramble here at home.
__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall
|

06-03-2007, 12:50 PM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 1,773
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OkhamsRazor
Your final paragraph is more sensationalized over simplification. Exactly how inept do you think our armed forces are? Do you have any idea how often jets ARE scrambled for THOSE VERY reasons? Again, it wasn't JUST the transponder, it was the CONFLUENCE OF ALL THREE EVENTS that will ALWAYS elicit a response to scramble.
Very weak attempt to obfuscate.
|
Funny post. Keep to the party line. I believe our military is the finest in the world, not inept at all, but they aren't perfect. They also don't make the decisions on their own. My responses were initially toward Georges contention that fighters should have been in the air and responding to the threats within one hour. I happen to agree with that. Unfortunately, the series of events that day lead to confusion and inaction...not on the part of the military, but the administration.
Not being a "Bush basher", I look at things objectively with an eye toward reality.
The reality is that the answers are not as simple as you'd like them to be. The situation was far from clear-cut an hour into it.
Oh, and by the way, it was your silly contention that every inch of the skies has been covered for forty years...you should have specified it every inch of the skies ABOVE 30k feet.
Believe what you want, it makes little difference to me.
|

06-03-2007, 12:56 PM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 1,773
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OkhamsRazor
LMAO... YES, THEY ARE sitting on the tarmac ready to go... every G8 country does... and it DOESN"T take much more than five minutes for them to be airborn. You don't get to superpower status without being able to intercept immediately. We also have AWAC and command flight centers in the air 24 hours a day in many parts of the world to emulate our ability to scramble here at home.
|
See. I admitted I didn't know if they were or not. You guys really need to get your stories straight though, one claims they can be engaging targets within 5 mins and the other says it doesn't take much more than 5 mins to scramble.
I'll have to take your word, you being a military specialist and all, but it would seem the intercepts would be directed more toward INCOMING threats. It would also seem a BEAR bomber coming in over Alaska or The east coast would present a far more readily established target than a civilain airliner and would present far fewer questions of intent.
But its nice to know, as a superpower, all the contingencies have been worked out. 
|

06-03-2007, 04:26 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,136
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OkhamsRazor
LMAO... YES, THEY ARE sitting on the tarmac ready to go... every G8 country does... and it DOESN"T take much more than five minutes for them to be airborn. You don't get to superpower status without being able to intercept immediately. We also have AWAC and command flight centers in the air 24 hours a day in many parts of the world to emulate our ability to scramble here at home.
|
You try slapping those side winders on pylons its not that easy.
Radar without a transponder tells you nothing. With all the planes in the air there was no way to know. FAA are not Forward Air Controlers. There was no way to pick those planes out even with a vector. Falcons are fast but not that damn fast. NORAD is no longer the system you think of from movies like Wargames. Even art there hight they were practicing to deal with a known incoming threat from over the North Poll.
These guy were obvioulsy all clueless. Whats concering is the FBI, CIA, NSA agents reporting they were told to look away from the warning signs.
|

06-03-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,233
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OkhamsRazor
They "knew" because that's what Rudy told them. It was a top down thing, not personal opinion. And you can certainly excuse their blind acceptance of that top down opinion after seeing two towers fall that should not have fallen, and certainly not into complete and total devastation.
Firehouse magazine has quotes from firemen on the scene who say they knew it was going to fall wee before it fell. Experienced firemen are not going to listen to a mayor or anyone else who doesn't have a clue about fires when making that assessment. This is entirely your opinin with nothing to back it up with.
About the hole... that raises some trouble for your viewpoint actually. First of all, how did a sixty ton girder get thrown over a hundred yards with less than five hundred feet to drop before hitting the building? That's an awful lot of lateral force for a gravitational collapse.
YOu do admit to there being a huge hole, right? I'll deal with the girder later.
Regardless, it did hit the building and cause a big gaping hole... from the top down. it did NOT sever any core columns. It did NOT strike the base. And here is the second problem your layman's understanding presents...
It in NO WAY accounts for a PERFECT textbook symmetrical collapse such as those seen in CD. Further, it does NOT explain unnatural speeds associated with the perfect collapse into it's own footprint without touching a single neighboring building.
There is no where for it to go but into its own "footprint". It is a huge building and it will fall down. Regardless, if you look at the debris pile from the building it shows that it was not a CD.
Quite the opposite. If the damage caused by the magic flying girder had anything to do with the collapse, it would have been a sloppy, slow, uneven toppling of the upper floors. NOT a neat pile in the basement.
I guess you haven't looked at the debris pile. Go back and look again. Only this time, expand your search beyond what various sites tell you or show you.
Dom, show me how much force is required to hurl sixty tons, 300 feet laterally with only 500 hundred feet to fall. For every 1.7 feet it falls, it also travels 1 foot sideways. I know planes that don't have that good of a glide slope. Remember Dom, this was a gravitational collapse, a pancaking event (according to your sources).
|
Pneumatic force would have forced some lateral movement. I am not a physicist, but I would assume that the lateral movement would not cease after the pneumatic forces were no longer a factor. There is also some evidence of a greater pneumatic force towards the bottom of the building, which only stand to reason.
|

06-03-2007, 10:23 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,429
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
Pneumatic force would have forced some lateral movement. I am not a physicist, but I would assume that the lateral movement would not cease after the pneumatic forces were no longer a factor. There is also some evidence of a greater pneumatic force towards the bottom of the building, which only stand to reason.
|
near the bottom? lmao.... so now, not only did a sixty ton girder travel over a hundred yards, it did it from the bottom? Against gravity?
Tell ya what sherlock... watch the moments of actual impact. see the flaming debris exiting the building at several hundred miles per hour? How far did that travel in the 800 feet it had to fall?
Don't worry, no one will ever confuse you with a physicist.
__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall
|

06-03-2007, 10:26 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,429
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noneof yourbusiness
You try slapping those side winders on pylons its not that easy.
Radar without a transponder tells you nothing. With all the planes in the air there was no way to know. FAA are not Forward Air Controlers. There was no way to pick those planes out even with a vector. Falcons are fast but not that damn fast. NORAD is no longer the system you think of from movies like Wargames. Even art there hight they were practicing to deal with a known incoming threat from over the North Poll.
These guy were obvioulsy all clueless. Whats concering is the FBI, CIA, NSA agents reporting they were told to look away from the warning signs.
|
The Hijackings were CALLED IN!!!! how much time do you need? It's NOT just the single transponder event... there are no less the FIVE CONFLUENT events that even a cavemen would recognize as TROUBLE!
AGAIN SCHLOMO, EVERY OTHER TIME THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE, FIGHTERS WERE NEXT TO THE SUSPECT PLANE IN LESS THAN FIFTEEN MINUTES. They DID NOT go blindly off to the edges of our borders scanning the horizon for MIGs with binoculars. GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!!
__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall
|

06-03-2007, 10:29 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,233
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OkhamsRazor
near the bottom? lmao.... so now, not only did a sixty ton girder travel over a hundred yards, it did it from the bottom? Against gravity?
Tell ya what sherlock... watch the moments of actual impact. see the flaming debris exiting the building at several hundred miles per hour? How far did that travel in the 800 feet it had to fall?
Don't worry, no one will ever confuse you with a physicist.
|
I didn't say that the girder came from the bottom. I said that evidence of pneumatic forces were present. besides, it is only logical to assume that those forces were there. Of course debris is going to exit the building, that is what the pneumatic force would do. You have thought about pneumatic forces haven't you?
Are you claiming that you are a physicist? I thought physicists actually had degrees from colleges? That would eliminate you.
|

06-03-2007, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,136
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OkhamsRazor
The Hijackings were CALLED IN!!!! how much time do you need? It's NOT just the single transponder event... there are no less the FIVE CONFLUENT events that even a cavemen would recognize as TROUBLE!
AGAIN SCHLOMO, EVERY OTHER TIME THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE, FIGHTERS WERE NEXT TO THE SUSPECT PLANE IN LESS THAN FIFTEEN MINUTES. They DID NOT go blindly off to the edges of our borders scanning the horizon for MIGs with binoculars. GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!!
|
Called in? uh the Gioverment was sking spain if they saw any suspcious people that morining. Americna airpsace is barely controled chaos. This crap about scrambled fighters everyday is a farce. If everytime some busy pilot failed to respond or some piece of equipment failed there be USAF all over the skies everywhere.
Its pretty hard to find a plane in the air.
|

06-03-2007, 10:51 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,429
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
I didn't say that the girder came from the bottom. I said that evidence of pneumatic forces were present. besides, it is only logical to assume that those forces were there. Of course debris is going to exit the building, that is what the pneumatic force would do. You have thought about pneumatic forces haven't you?
Are you claiming that you are a physicist? I thought physicists actually had degrees from colleges? That would eliminate you.
|
You know nothing of my academic accomplishments. But then... why would a lack of knowledge stop a neo-con apologist from starting something as fact.
As far as "pneumatic forces"... you are completely right, there were. But what you fail to realize for the gazillionth time... is that every time you add a new explanation, it removes energy from the system. trying to explain the complete destruction of the massive core columns, the pyroclastic flows, the energy to pulverize every last ounce of concrete on every single floor, AND NOW pneumatic processes flinging semi truck sized beams 100 yards...
THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ENERGY IN A GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE TO ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THESE FACTORS. The weight of the buildings had a KNOWN downward energy capability. Since energy can neither be created nor destroyed... you can't get something fro nothing... it is IMPOSSIBLE (and trust me, I don't use that word very often) for all these events to be attributable to a gravitational collapse.
But you've been told this before... and you just hold up your ignorance of the physical realm as a "as long as I don't know better, I can say anything I want" excuse.
You do realize that for the girder to make this trip in a gravitational collapse, it had to come from near the top of the building. Not much weight up there to propel something with pneumatic forces. especially when the compression table is moving at incredible speed AWAY from the compression actuator. It's like closing the jaws on a vice, except that the jaws never close because they are both moving... in the same direction. The ONLY place where the compression table would have been unmoving enough to supply close to the force you need to make your layman's theory to work... IS AT THE BOTTOM!
__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|