NO TURNING BACK TO THE OLD WORLD AFTER 9/11

September 11 has placed open societies and their democratic values at the crossroads of victory or subjugation. No intellectual quibbling or obfuscation can cover or evade this historic fact. Fanatic Muslim terrorists pose a threat to civilized societies of biblical proportions, especially if they acquire weapons of mass destruction, and worse, from rogue states.

Yet the liberal intelligentsia in its necrophilous stance attempts to shift the blame from the terrorist perpetrators to their victims. In their mind's eyes, September 11 was the comeuppance of America for the ills the latter had "rained" upon the poor and the oppressed of the world by spreading its rapacious eagle's wings over the globe in its pursuit of dominance and empire. Thus, the terrorist threat is subordinated and replaced by the liberal invention of its own "evil empire". Turning logic on its head, fanatic terrorism becomes less dangerous and is transformed into a "lesser evil".

In an ironic twist, the threat posed by terrorists against the West, is turned into the threat of the "Lone Avenger". But that the latter might ride through the canyons of America, in his pursuit of punishing evil, not with six caliber pistols in his holsters but with nuclear weapons , is of no concern to liberals. Hence, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are all liberals. Foreordaining the destruction of Western societies by a fanatic horde of religious barbarians.

For the historically savvy part of mankind, there is no turning back to the old world of complacency and innocence, but to advance forward against this mortal foe with no quarter given. New challenges impose new methods of resolving them. Conventional diplomacy, under the auspices of the dilatory, weak and corrupt UN, is defunct.

Do you see an explosion? http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc1dem2...on.north.2.mpg

Do you see it yet? http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc1dem2...2.enl.slow.wmv

Is there an explosion in this picture or is it just me? :

Planes are generally powered by fuel, which, when heated, blows up.

This fireball occured almost 1 hour after the planes fires were nearly extinguished.

It is obvious from the video footage that an explosion occurred at the time of the collaplse....as seen in the picture and the video footage.

We can all see an explosion.....it is not "steel melting" .....it is a giant fireball......

How come you are protecting the terrorists?

This is just silly. I see a bunch of fire, which happens after the top of the building collapses. Which, coincidentally, is exactly what happens in a backdraft:

"A backdraft occurs when oxygen-starved fire suddenly receives oxygen. The sudden rush of oxygen causes all of the super-heated gases to ignite at the same time, which causes an explosion. While the risk of such an occurrence is low, a backdraft is sometimes fatal to anyone caught in it."

http://www.marysvilleohio.org/terminology.htm

I'm not sure how you claim to know that all the jet fuel fires were extinguished inside the building. Given that anyone who was up there at the time is now dead, I consider it unlikely that there is any source for that. And I don't see what's so strange about the video. Big part of building suddenly collapses, fire shoots out of it - likely because fire inside was exposed to oxygen as the exterior of the building went away.

And, this myth is pretty thoroughly refuted by Popular Mechanics:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=4&c=y

"Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air--along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse--was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."

While Popular Mechanics is a government front organization controlled by the Illuminati, I have it on good authority that they have recently been freed from government mind control beams by Ashtar, a being from beyond this dimension dedicated to eliminating the control by the Reptoid front groups such as the Post Office.

You are aware that that article was written by Benjamin Chertoff?

Cousin of Homeland Conspiracy Michael Chertoff.

Well......because the Fire Dept said that the fires were under control:

FDNY Audio Link: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IM...refighters.wma

Text: "Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor

We also have pictures of the WTC before it collapsed......this woman is not on fire....she is waiting to be rescued:

Uh-oh.

Brawwwwk.

Brawwwk.

BZZZZZZ


PUt your tinfoil hats on. here is another retard who says that the WTC were blown up without any evidence other than doctored photos.

Haha. What a dupe.



Not-so-lucid, why don't you address the topic of the thread instead of trying to change it into a debate about your stupid theories?


BTW, kotzabasis, great thread. I like your expressive language.

necrophilous stance is a very clever turn of phrase.

Good on ya.!!!

This is why the Bush admin and the others in the Gov. are doomed to failure and eventual imprisonment.

The photo and video evidence used by 911 truthers like myself are from the official sources.

The above images of the demolition of the WTC can be found at any "official source"....it is the stock footage.

It is only a matter of time at this point.

In order to continue their lies about 911.....they actually have to stop people from watching the collapse footage from the day of the attack......you can clearly see the explosions.

How do YOU know that they are from the original, undoctored footage?

How do YOU know that the WTC was exploded?

Do you have any particular expertise that would make your pronouncements anything more than the ravings of a lunatic?