When bin Laden said al-Qaeda did it was it propoganda as well?

Yeah, it was.

Can you produce that confession?

Yes, I can, just as easily as you can stop being a lazy fucker and actually look for some of this stuff as well. Google bin-Laden admits to 9/11 and I am sure you will get a lot of hits.

How is it propoganda if he is saying al-Qaeda is responsible? You do know that he is/was the leader of al-Qaeda, don't you?

Just look for his tapes, the transcripts are online, in fact, I just looked at one of them. He admits it in at least two tapes that I know of, plus KSM has admitted to it. So did Moussaoui.

Are you referring to the one tape which supposedly has Usama admitting that he did it?


Go ahead, Dommy!

Make the definitive case, so you won't look like an idiot again.

Just playing devils advocate...

\

You look like an idiot all the time, like claiming that only presidents can be impeached. I don't think it is laziness which causes you not to make any arguments, I think it is a self-awareness that you really don't knwo what the fuck you are talking about most of the time.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2...0011213ubl.pdf

Now, your buddies at 9/11 "Scholars" say it is a fake, but they have to because it screws up their half-baked theories. Their main contention was that he mentioned one of the hi-jackers that was reported to be alive . . . thing is, that was proven false. What the dipshits at 9/11 "Scholars" don't realize is that there is a lot of people in the Arab world named Ramzi and Muhammed.

Thats just the first time he admitted to it, there are others.

Plus, KSM, Zawahiri, and Moussaoui have all admitted al-Qaeda was responsible as well.

Why don't you present an argument otherwise. That would be funny, like watching a monkey try to fuck a football funny.

"What the dipshits at 9/11 "Scholars" don't realize is that there is a lot of people in the Arab world named Ramzi and Muhammed."

Ooooooooooooooh...

You got it all figured out, do ya DoMmy?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAH!!!!!!


SAY....Was Rumsfeld "impeached'?

So in other words, when a terrorist orginization lays claim to a terrorist attack they are not to be believed, it is a lie. The real "truth" of it is, that the US is really behind these attacks and these so-called "terrorist" groups only accept the credit because it makes them look more important in the eyes of fellow so-called "Jihadists".
This is done in order to make these groups look bad and to trick the public into it's continued support and funding for the "war on terror"....is that about the jist of it?

Whatever floats your boat. If that's how your logic works, run with it.

Ummm . . . I know that the reports of hijackers being alive was bullshit and even the BBC, who first reported it, retracted it and said the guy who reported it was full of shit.

Rumsfeld wasn't impeached, and according to you unless he is president he can't be impeached. Of course, you would be partly right, Rumsfeld couldn't be impeached, but being president would have nothing to do with it. You should thank me for educating you.

I produced what you asked me to produce and you have nothing to say . . . as usual.