Do you REALLY Want 9/11 Truth Revealed?

A. Crowley · #51 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 12:14 PM

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11

A. Crowley · #52 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 12:15 PM

Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Dom1 · #53 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11

Had trouble getting it to come up, why don't you summarize it for me?

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

Scholars for 9/11 Truth

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

These are the same knuckeheads that spoonfeed the people on here. We have already seen what they have to say as it is the same as the arguments offered on here by CT's. Where do you think they get the idea that no plane hit the Pentagon?

The 911Truth has already been debunked. Hell, if you think they haven't go ahead and advance their arguments, I will make a fool of you and them yet again, what is one more time.

A. Crowley · #54 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 12:25 PM

You are as dumb as a pocket full 'o catshit, DOmmy.

You say all the 9/11 Scholars for truth have been "debunked"?

Who say's?

Popular Mechanics?

LMFAO

A. Crowley · #55 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 12:26 PM

The only argument I'm making is that YOU have proved NOTHING with your links, and I actually read them.

Dom1 · #56 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

You are as dumb as a pocket full 'o catshit, DOmmy.

You say all the 9/11 Scholars for truth have been "debunked"?

Who say's?

Popular Mechanics?

LMFAO

Not just Popular Mechanics, but a lot of different places. When they fuck up stuff like no plane hitting the Pentagon then it becomes real easy to debunk them.

Go ahead and present their arguments, Crowley, it isn't like other CTers on here haven't presented the exact same evidence to only have it thoroughly discredited.

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

The only argument I'm making is that YOU have proved NOTHING with your links, and I actually read them.

Again, provide the 911Truth argument.

Their followers say Silverstein's insurance policy is proof of wrongdoing, my evidence showed that he was forced to get a higher policy than he initially wanted.

Their followers say the plane parts could not have come from a commercial airline, my sources (who are the engine manufacturers) say that they are full of shit. You say it proves nothing, so are you saying that Pratt-Whitney is part of the coverup? What abut Rolls Royce?

Their followers make claims like the Chertoff's are related (without anything to support them), my sources show that they are not.

Make the guided missile argument! The guided missile that was weaving so bad that it knocked down a bunch of light poles on the way to the Pentagon.

Too easy.

A. Crowley · #57 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 12:42 PM

Too stupid.................

Dom1 · #58 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A. Crowley

Too stupid.................

Present your evidence from James Fetzer and Dylan Avery.

You can start . . . . . . . . now!

A. Crowley · #59 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 01:04 PM

Dylan Avery is not a 9/11 Scholar for Truth.

I'm not about to get into it with you; pinball brained idiot.

Petey · #60 (**permalink**) 05-14-2008, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dom1

Are you going to actually comment on the evidence I posted? You say there were no plane parts from a commercial airline and I not only give you parts all over the lawn but confirmation from the engine manufacturer . . . but you remain silent.

You tell me that the Chertoff's are brothers but I show evidence that they aren't related . . . and you remain silent.

You tell me that there was not DNA recovered from the Pentagon when in fact 179 0f the 184 bodies were identified . . . and you remain silent.

You don't need anything to confirm your belief, you want to believe therefore you do. That can be seen through the fact that although you have made several statements on here that are obviously and provably false you still won't look at the other side.

You didn't debate two years ago, you just posted a link and when rebuttal was offered you moved on to the next thing. When someone else offered up proof of something you just dismissed it as government propaganda, which is convenient for your arguments.

Tell me why I should waste my time with one of your Loose Change type videos when you refuse to even address proof I brought up when it was YOU who asked me to post that proof? Seriously, tell me why I should spend the time when you clearly refuse to even comment on the proof that your statements were wrong.

Bullshit,

I've commented on your websites numerous times including this thread. They are government cover-ups. Thats my answer.

The video i sent you is not a Loose Change type movie. It is a speech given by Michael Ruppert former L.A.P.D. narcotics detective. Again, there's alot to learn from the video but i guess that some arent willing to learn the truth about their government. In your case....GODvernment almighty.

Do you deny the FBI's involvement in the first WTC attack too?

Pictures of airplane parts or buildings falling is not even needed to see the truth Dom. It's a matter of reading between the lines.

Remain a sheep Dom. It really doesnt matter to me.