Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > September 11th
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2006, 03:27 PM
Petey's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ONE NATION UNDER MIND CONTROL
Posts: 5,750
Blog Entries: 2
Default Flight 93

This thread is available to discuss / debate the 9/11 tragedy of flight 93.

There was somewhere between 30 and 55 minutes after Flight 93 was "suspect" to intercept it. The current official story is that 3 F-16 fighters had been scrambled at 9:24AM and were airborne over Washington D.C. by 9:40AM. AWACS and a Tanker were scrambled also. These pilots saw the Pentagon on fire, the President had OK'd a shootdown, the Secret Service had advised the pilots to protect the White House at all costs, and Flight 93 was the only aircraft off course - heading toward D.C. - with it's transponder off. Flight 93 crashed at 10:06AM only 125 miles from D.C. (10 minutes away at 750mph for an F-16) and 3 nuclear power plants were in between Flight 93 and D.C.

Why did Air Traffic Controllers in a Nashua Telegraph article report an F-16 was circling Flight 93 and was in visual range at the time of crash - and why does the Government currently DENY that?

How did metal scraps, clothing and garbage bags full other debris gathered by residents and turned over to the FBI float on the breeze from a 35 foot deep muddy hole through wet, muddy fields for between 2.5 and 8 miles in 9 knot(10.4 mph) winds as the NTSB has declared? Why hasn't this happened in any other airline crashes that did not have mid-air traumas?
__________________



The truth about America

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION


We cant be so fixated on our desire to serve the rights of ordinary Americans....Bill Clinton March 11, 1993
Protecting the 9-11 Terrorists: Order W199I-WF-213589

God Bless the U.S. Slaves!


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 01:43 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey View Post
This thread is available to discuss / debate the 9/11 tragedy of flight 93.

There was somewhere between 30 and 55 minutes after Flight 93 was "suspect" to intercept it. The current official story is that 3 F-16 fighters had been scrambled at 9:24AM and were airborne over Washington D.C. by 9:40AM. AWACS and a Tanker were scrambled also. These pilots saw the Pentagon on fire, the President had OK'd a shootdown, the Secret Service had advised the pilots to protect the White House at all costs, and Flight 93 was the only aircraft off course - heading toward D.C. - with it's transponder off. Flight 93 crashed at 10:06AM only 125 miles from D.C. (10 minutes away at 750mph for an F-16) and 3 nuclear power plants were in between Flight 93 and D.C.

Why did Air Traffic Controllers in a Nashua Telegraph article report an F-16 was circling Flight 93 and was in visual range at the time of crash - and why does the Government currently DENY that?

How did metal scraps, clothing and garbage bags full other debris gathered by residents and turned over to the FBI float on the breeze from a 35 foot deep muddy hole through wet, muddy fields for between 2.5 and 8 miles in 9 knot(10.4 mph) winds as the NTSB has declared? Why hasn't this happened in any other airline crashes that did not have mid-air traumas?

Because Bush said so, I heard what I needed to hear, now it is time to bury my head in the sand. Geez Louise, you are making me miss the Jon Benet Ramsey coverage on Greta Van SuspectJournalist. I will save all other cooments until I watch Glenn Beck and he tells me waht to think. I missed Oreilly yesterday so I am drawing a blank.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 02:02 PM
Scoody Boo's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petey View Post
This thread is available to discuss / debate the 9/11 tragedy of flight 93.

There was somewhere between 30 and 55 minutes after Flight 93 was "suspect" to intercept it. The current official story is that 3 F-16 fighters had been scrambled at 9:24AM and were airborne over Washington D.C. by 9:40AM. AWACS and a Tanker were scrambled also. These pilots saw the Pentagon on fire, the President had OK'd a shootdown, the Secret Service had advised the pilots to protect the White House at all costs, and Flight 93 was the only aircraft off course - heading toward D.C. - with it's transponder off. Flight 93 crashed at 10:06AM only 125 miles from D.C. (10 minutes away at 750mph for an F-16) and 3 nuclear power plants were in between Flight 93 and D.C.

Why did Air Traffic Controllers in a Nashua Telegraph article report an F-16 was circling Flight 93 and was in visual range at the time of crash - and why does the Government currently DENY that?

How did metal scraps, clothing and garbage bags full other debris gathered by residents and turned over to the FBI float on the breeze from a 35 foot deep muddy hole through wet, muddy fields for between 2.5 and 8 miles in 9 knot(10.4 mph) winds as the NTSB has declared? Why hasn't this happened in any other airline crashes that did not have mid-air traumas?
At the time that Flight 93 was suspect, another flight, 1989 (I am not too sure about the number) was also under suspicion of being hijacked. What is "visual range?" Visual range at 35,000 feet is hundreds of square miles so it is no gaurantee that visual contact can be made.

As to why there is such a large debris field, the plane crashed straight into the ground. Simple physics.

__________________

Liberal-a person who has his cake, eats his cake, and complains that other people don't have cake, and believes that you should donate your cake to them


Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 02:04 PM
Areyouforreal's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cowtown, Texas
Posts: 7,417
Default

Petey once again here is you answer. But one again you will probably not read it

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=7&c=y

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=8&c=y

Just for grins though you won't look at them either
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=1&c=y

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?cha...1583414B7F0000

http://ourworld-top.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm


Petey as HAL 9000: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
__________________
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp92vkXcC0w
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 02:31 PM
Scoody Boo's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,864
Default

__________________

Liberal-a person who has his cake, eats his cake, and complains that other people don't have cake, and believes that you should donate your cake to them


Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 02:43 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoody Boo View Post
At the time that Flight 93 was suspect, another flight, 1989 (I am not too sure about the number) was also under suspicion of being hijacked. What is "visual range?" Visual range at 35,000 feet is hundreds of square miles so it is no gaurantee that visual contact can be made.

As to why there is such a large debris field, the plane crashed straight into the ground. Simple physics.

The crash site or "hole in the ground" was not consistent with other plane crash sites, nor was the Pentagon missile, but the security camera footage that is being w/held (obstruction of Justice) would clear that right up. But you have heard what you need to hear so you have no interest.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 06:07 PM
Petey's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ONE NATION UNDER MIND CONTROL
Posts: 5,750
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Areyouforreal View Post
Petey once again here is you answer. But one again you will probably not read it

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=7&c=y

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=8&c=y

Just for grins though you won't look at them either
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=1&c=y

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?cha...1583414B7F0000

http://ourworld-top.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm


Petey as HAL 9000: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
Here is a website for you areyouforreal.....not that you'll read it. *nudge nudge*

http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/090305alexresponds.htm
__________________



The truth about America

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION


We cant be so fixated on our desire to serve the rights of ordinary Americans....Bill Clinton March 11, 1993
Protecting the 9-11 Terrorists: Order W199I-WF-213589

God Bless the U.S. Slaves!


Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 06:27 PM
Areyouforreal's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cowtown, Texas
Posts: 7,417
Default

I'll read it when i get home
__________________
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp92vkXcC0w
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 06:38 PM
Petey's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ONE NATION UNDER MIND CONTROL
Posts: 5,750
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Areyouforreal View Post
I'll read it when i get home
Here's a poll for you while you're driving home: http://www.texastollparty.com/survey.php
__________________



The truth about America

PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION


We cant be so fixated on our desire to serve the rights of ordinary Americans....Bill Clinton March 11, 1993
Protecting the 9-11 Terrorists: Order W199I-WF-213589

God Bless the U.S. Slaves!


Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2006, 09:17 PM
Areyouforreal's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cowtown, Texas
Posts: 7,417
Default

I am not very impressed by Perry. He really hasn't done anything for Texas. I will not vote for Kinky or Grandma either. I am not going to waste my vote on an independent. I actually am looking at Democrat Chris Bell though.
Greybeard or Spitty since Bell is from Houston what do you think of him?
__________________
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp92vkXcC0w
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings