911, Keep punching holes in flimsy official story

Scoody Boo · #81 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitty

I alone cannot, I am a small nothing compared to the Administartion. Yes, the people are owed an exuastive investigation, not a cover-up and the destroying of evidence at a crime scene. People who think the way you think are perfect lap dogs for the Aministration. Do what we say and you can feel like a winner, associate yourself with the 51% and you can feel like the champion.

The Government already put out it's investigation. It stands by it. It is up to those who disagree with it to dispute it.

Hodgepodge · #82 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitty

Less than you think, FAA and military were playing war games the morning of 911 so they had no Idea. Black OPS is a rogue unit of the military could have provided man power, CIA runs the show, Moussad helps out, cell phone recordings were generated over-seas by people who probably hate America, a few top Military brass following orders i.e. Tommy Franks, Rudy Guiliani knows. Most of NYFD died that had first hand knowledge, NYFD top brass may have known, probably got promoted or is working for Govt. now.

There is no group within CIA, DIA, NSA, etc called Black OPS. Black ops is a term to describe covert operations consucted typically, but not exclusively, by the CIA. Black ops are secret, often totally off the books. Maybe you meant Delta Force, Seals, Green Berets? You did say they were military after all.

Your piece fell into logical fallacies again. You make a statement assuming it is true. Then what follows next depends on the first statement being true. It is a house of cards logic wise.

Hodgepodge · #83 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitty

I alone cannot, I am a small nothing compared to the Administartion. Yes, the people are owed an exuastive investigation, not a cover-up and the destroying of evidence at a crime scene. People who think the way you think are perfect lap dogs for the Aministration. Do what we say and you can feel like a winner, associate yourself with the 51% and you can feel like the champion.

Spitty, you have fallen back into your logic traps again. You refuse to answer a question regarding how many people YOU believe might have pulled the conspiracy off. You want an exhaustive study (which already took place but resulted in a decios you do not like). Then you attack, calling anyone who does not believe you a "lap dog for the administration."

The fallacy of Personal Attack.

Logic 101. Try it sometime.

Spitty · #84 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hodgepodge

Spitty, you have fallen back into your logic traps again. You refuse to answer a question regarding how many people YOU believe might have pulled the conspiracy off. You want an exhaustive study (which already took place but resulted in a decios you do not like). Then you attack, calling anyone who does not believe you a "lap dog for the administration."

The fallacy of Personal Attack.

Logic 101. Try it sometime.

I said I don't know how many, that is an answer. Sorry my modus tollens is a bit off, I was never very good at if..then statements, I had to retake logic in summer school and still got a C. I make personal attacks becuase that is the kind of person I am. If I may, too many Lap dogs automatically try to kill a debate by creating an instant strawman by trying to link any descrepency with area 51, tin-foil on the head, bigfoot, ect. or the worst "Liberal" so we are all guilty of fallacy.

Areyouforreal · #85 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 05:12 PM

Spitty you are forgetting that we live in a country where you are innocent untill PROVEN guilty. That is why the administration doesn't even have to acknowledge your stupid theories. Unless you can prove something with hard evidence (not Alex Jones or Jerry Springer sites) then he is innocent of any involvement in 9-11.

Spitty · #86 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scoody Boo

I did. Now I await your answer as to how many people took part in the WTC conspiracy.

I know, you also answer. Why is Areyouforreal answering for you? I can't come up with a number. The only hope is for an exhuastive investigation.

Spitty · #87 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Areyouforreal

Spitty you are forgetting that we live in a country where you are innocent untill PROVEN guilty. That is why the administration doesn't even have to acknowledge your stupid theories. Unless you can prove something with hard evidence (not Alex Jones or Jerry Springer sites) then he is innocent of any involvement in 9-11.

Jerry Springer? Come on. Jones often cites Reuters, AP, London Gaurdian. I rarely see a crazy site. The instruction is, take in all facts and info, and make your own conclusion. If you are satisfied with the official story and you sleep well at night, then so be it, that is your world. But know that there are people who are not UFO or Big Foot or foil-heads who are not satisfied with the official story, that is his/her or my world. I sleep well becuase my work-outs male me tired.

Areyouforreal · #88 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 11:47 PM

Yeah Reuters is a real reliable source to trust

Areyouforreal · #89 (**permalink**) 08-07-2006, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitty

I know, you also answer. Why is Areyouforreal answering for you? I can't come up with a number. The only hope is for an exhuastive investigation.

I was not answering for anybody. What now only certain people can answer your questions?

Dom1 · #90 (**permalink**) 08-08-2006, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spitty

Jerry Springer? Come on. Jones often cites Reuters, AP, London Gaurdian. I rarely see a crazy site. The instruction is, take in all facts and info, and make your own conclusion. If you are satisfied with the official story and you sleep well at night, then so be it, that is your world. But know that there are people who are not UFO or Big Foot or foil-heads who are not satisfied with the official story, that is his/her or my world. I sleep well becuase my work-outs male me tired.

Quit it. Jones cites these sources and then converts the information in them to fit his thinking. He usually talks about how the various mainstream news sources are part of the 'cover-up' of one thing or another.

He gets most of his information from places like the rense report, Daily Kos, News Hounds, various online journalists, and America Free Press. Most of which ask for donations or are willing to give more information with subscription fees.

If his facts are so good, and his analysis so right on the money, do you believe his most recent reports? He reported today that he has sources which confirmed that the CFR/Bilderburg group talked of their plan to erase US borders this past weekend in a meeting in Ottawa. Hillary was sighted there and it is only more proof. He recently got some information from the ever reliable source of "Kyle". Kyle infiltrated the Bohemian Grove with a pen camera and took some disturbing pictures of trees and rocks and such. If you want more information you can by the video, as he tells us at the end of each of the stories he personally reports on.

I will have to say that I am glad you and a couple of your cohorts refer to him so much though. I do enjoy reading his rantings at times.