911, Keep punching holes in flimsy official story

Areyouforreal · #11 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 10:54 AM

Hey George ever stop to think (probably not) that the hijackers wanted to make themselve loos dumb to throw attention off themselves?

TheYellowDog · #12 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George O Well

"ANDERSON: They're probably not squawking anything [broadcasting a beacon code] anyway. I mean, obviously these guys are in the cockpit.
NASYPANY: These guys are smart.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yeah, they knew exactly what they wanted to do."

>>>Knowing enough to turn off the transponder ain't exactly genius. It's only purpose is to locate and identify your aircraft. Still, I think Atta & Co. had inside help, possibly from a nefarious 'friendly' intelligence service.

The worst mistake one can make is to underestimate other's potential, you know? Do you really think that these people are dumb?

ray · #13 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scoody Boo

The conspiracyists always try to use science to back up their ideas. They also insist that it is impossible for a building to collapse on it's own footprint without the help of explosives.

Heres a little physics for you. Do you have any idea of the tonnage of the buildings? The kenetic energy they built up as they collapsed? They fell on their own footprint because there was not external force big enough to push them sideways! The buildings took the path of least resistance and that was straight down. DUH!

Yes, I've read and heard plenty of testimony, both in threads here and in the media from demoltion experts who take buildings down with explosives for a living. It takes weesof work, and it can't be done without doing a lot of wiring and tearing out of internal pieces of the building. It would have been impossible to plant explosives in the World Trade Center without disrupting business there and being seen by many thousands of people.

And then there's the Pentagon attack in which the wackos want to say it was not a plane but a US missile. They never explain what happend to Flight 77 and crew and pasengers who were aboard Flight 77. One of those passengers was a rather well-known writer and TV personality named Barbara Olson. She was on he way from DC to California to appear on a network TV show. She never made it and has not been heard from since, nor have any of the others on the plane. Nor did the plane land at any airport.

Until the jokesters answer the questions of how the WTC towers were set with explosives without anyone noticing, and what happened to the several dozen people on Flight 77, not to mention a rather large aircraft, I don't even read what they say. It's nonsense and a silly distraction from the real problems this country had better deal with.

Still Dizzy · #14 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 10:58 AM

How about the security tapes at the airport that identified the hijackers?

How about the eye witnesses on the ground who remember them getting on the planes?

How about the 15-20 phone calls made by passengers on the planes?

How many people would be involved in this? 50? 100? 200? NOBODY has come forward who was a principal in the "plot." Is this the first time, since the dawn of man, that so many people keep their mouth shut over such a "plot?"

You can throw around a lot of "proof?????" but if you calm down and look at the facts, it just don't fly.

ray · #15 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 11:04 AM

I've read and heard plenty both in threads here and in the media from demoltion experts who take buildings down with explosives for a living to know it takes weeks of work, and it can't be done without doing a lot of wiring and tearing out of internal pieces of the building. It would have been impossible to plant explosives in the World Trade Center without disrupting business there and being seen by many thousands of people.

And then there's the Pentagon attack in which the wackos want to say it was not a plane but a US missile. They never explain what happend to Flight 77 and crew and pasengers who were aboard Flight 77. One of those passengers was a rather well-known writer and TV personality named Barbara Olson. She was also the wife of the then-Solicitor-General of the Unite States. She was on he way from DC to California to appear on a network TV show. She never made it and has not been heard from since, nor have any of the others on the plane. Nor did the plane land at any airport.

The jokesters need to answer the questions of how the WTC towers were set with explosives without anyone noticing, and what happened to the several dozen people on Flight 77, not to mention a rather large aircraft.

ray · #16 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 11:11 AM

I ddn't mean to double post. There was some sort of glitch that made it appear my first try didn't go.

Spitty · #17 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scoody Boo

No one, not a single person in the world has the authority to order the shootdown of an American Airliner over American soil except the President of the United States. As we all know, the President was at a public event when the attacks were taking place.

You also have to take into consideration that when the 1st plane struck the WTC, everyone in the world thought it was an accident. It was not until the second one at 9:03 AM, hit that it became apparent that an attack was in progress. At that very moment, there were 4000 private aircraft in the air. The Pentagon was hit within 30 minutes of the second plane hitting the WTC. It was 30 minutes after that that flight 93 crashed into the ground as passengers fought the terrorists for control of it.

The WTC being struck by two planes, the Pentagon being struck, Flight 93 crashing, and the South Tower Collapsing took just over an hour. These are events taking place hundreds of miles apart. I do not blame anyone in the government for being confused.

Pre-meditated confusion provided the perfect cover to pull off 911

Spitty · #18 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scoody Boo

I have noticed that, thier hatred of President Bush has blinded them to their own silliness.

Listen to you guys, trying to comfort each other, with the "official story"

George O Well · #19 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 12:48 PM

"I doubt that if a passenger on any airliner was picked at random, taken to the cockpit and told to turn to the transponder off, they would not be able to find it. The location of this is not common knowledge."

>>>Anybody who has taken an introductory flight lesson knows what a transponder looks like.

And it certainly could have been Clinton's intelligence service that was involved in the planning. Maybe Clinton knew about it but didn't have the cajones to go through with it.

Spitty · #20 (**permalink**) 08-04-2006, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ray

Yes, I've read and heard plenty of testimony, both in threads here and in the media from demoltion experts who take buildings down with explosives for a living. It takes weesof work, and it can't be done without doing a lot of wiring and tearing out of internal pieces of the building. It would have been impossible to plant explosives in the World Trade Center without disrupting business there and being seen by many thousands of people.

And then there's the Pentagon attack in which the wackos want to say it was not a plane but a US missile. They never explain what happend to Flight 77 and crew and pasengers who were aboard Flight 77. One of those passengers was a rather well-known writer and TV personality named Barbara Olson. She was on he way from DC to California to appear on a network TV show. She never made it and has not been heard from since, nor have any of the others on the plane. Nor did the plane land at any airport.

Until the jokesters answer the questions of how the WTC towers were set with explosives without anyone noticing, and what happened to the several dozen people on Flight 77, not to mention a rather large aircraft, I don't even read what they say. It's nonsense and a silly distraction from the real problems this country had better deal with.

Allow me Famous Ray, during the confusion of FAA and NORAD, flight 77 landed at an undisclosed location, as the passengers were most likely informed that this was a terror drill or threat. Those passengers were consolidated with passengers feom the other 3 flights and what happened to them is up for debate, but this could how DNA was recovred for the families of the victims who would ask about remains. Also flight 93 landed in Cleveland Ohio...Hmmmm?