Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hodgepodge
Let me ask a simple question. What would have been the point of a conspiracy to blow up WTC7? WTC1 & 2 were down. The Pentagon was hit. Flight 93 was in a field in Pennsylvania. What was the point?
One problem with conspiracies is that they tend to require a large number of people all orking together in secret.
Look for the simple solution - it is usually right.
|
What gets me is how these people trully believe that the bombs could have been placed in the WTC Towers in secret. I worked for Dore and Associates before enlisting in the Army, probably one of the premiere demolition companies in the world. A job like the WTC would have taken hundreds of people to set up, There is a lot of demolition that goes on before the charges are even set. This involves the removal of drywall, electrical conduit, plumbing, anything that is in the way of getting to the structural supports. A job like this would involve the best people in the industry to set up. Military explosive guys would never be able to do it.
A job like the WTC would involve so many people in the form of resources and people that everyone in the industry (the community of people doing this work is very small) would have heard of it.
Hundreds of guys, working for months and trashing the place to set it up. To do it in secret? Probably twice as many guys and a year, meaning that it is Bill Clinton who should be the target of any investigation, not Bush.
I see stupidity on the net and political sites all of the time, but the stupidity of the 9-11 conspiracy theorists and Stolen Election bozos can't be matched.
Linear Mode
