This poll is desighned to show all thoes who cant be taken seriously! In other words, who should I just ignore.

__________________
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem." Ronald Reagan http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/war...bout-iraq.html

Well...

at one point a couple of the planes were inside....briefly.

Does that count?

__________________
The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.
- Jack Handy

Conspiracy theoriest suck. NOW they say the government placed phony phone calls to loved ones. Whatever.

Yeah fuck you. ITs not like they cant do that or anything.

__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related

What poll? I don't see any poll.

We just can't take you seriously I guess...

__________________
"If you're going to tell people the truth, be funny or they'll kill you." -- Billy Wilder

"Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied." -- Otto Von Bismark

I would take him more serious than the CTers. You see, when they have something in their argument proven wrong it doesn't matter to them as they just move on to the next thing. Hard to take someone serious hwo has so little faith in their argument that they jsut abandon it and go on to the next thing because they ahve a desire for there to be a conspiracy.

Smitty doesn't even admit when something is wrong, just pastes more links to the same thing that was just proven wrong.....

I'm not a big conspiracy theorist.....that being said, people do conspire at times......

__________________
"If you're going to tell people the truth, be funny or they'll kill you." -- Billy Wilder

"Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied." -- Otto Von Bismark

Dom never prooved anything at all. I did finanly find evidence that showed a plane at the pentegon on my own. I always said here and other places when that evidence was shown me Id be happy to say it.

I say it again. I now see without question it was indeed a plane at the pentegon.

I have not seen anything about the towers to quell my questions there yet though.

As far as the pennselvania plane. It wasnt shot down im am sure. I have though never saw it and that smoldering mound on the treeline doesnt satisfy me as being proof of anything at all.

__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related

I showed you plenty of evidence that it was a plane at the Pentagon, you just chose to not believe me because you didn't want to be wrong. Now you say that you found evidence that showed you were indeed wrong, but can save some face by claimin gthat you found it on your own . . . go ahead, either way you were wrong. I showed you the evidence but you couldn't admit that I did . . . you had to save face, and above is the route you took. I bet that evidence you found is almost identical to the evidence I provided.

Example, you still clung to the belief that those ridiculous videos you posted about a bomb scare were proof of some controlled demolition when in fact they were tlaking about a high school. I showed you the full video of it and you still claimed it was proof. Fact is, it wasn't the video you were arguing against, it was the person who provided the video. If that weren't true then you wouldn't have held on to that silly belief even after it was proven wrong.

Anyone hear of the latest CT'ers claim? It seems that Cheney and Condi Rice purchased insurance on the WTC several weeks before the terrorist attack. This is touted as proof positive that the Bush administration knew well in advance the building would be attacked.

Since Cheney or Rice had no financial interest in the WTC (it was owned by the City of New York) there is no explanation offered as to how they were able to purchase any insurance (insurance is purchased to cover your losses, what loss could Cheney or Rice have claimed in this instance?)

__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy