Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > Religion and Philosophy
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 10:35 AM
Virgil Kaine's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 209
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W.J. Wilczek View Post
There are no absolute rights. All rights are subject to law that defines their limitation. There is nothing in the course of human events, from the moment of life’s conception to the final disposition of one’s mortal remains and property after death, that is not governed by law. To say that one has a right to anything can only be validated by law.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil Kaine View Post
OK. How can a law violate somebodys' "Rights" when the law validates the right? "All rights are subject to law that defines their limitation."
Doesn't it follow that there must be rights "out there" somewhere that can't be changed by the Laws of Man or we wouldn't run into this problem time and time again?

I don't understand how you can have no rights but those given by law and rights that can't be changed by law? It seems a little "having it both ways" to me. It looks like if the courts don't like the new rule of law they can say YOU CAN"T CHANGE THIS its an unalienable right. On the other hand we can give rights by law to things unthought of before. Double standard?
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.J. Wilczek View Post
The idea of so-called "natural rights" is a fiction. All rights are the creation of law. As Bentham put it: "[N]atural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense,—nonsense upon stilts." Jeremy Bentham, Anarchical Fallacies (1816).
I still don't understand How a law can violate a persons rights if "All rights are the creation of law." How does this work?
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 10:42 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W.J. Wilczek View Post
The idea of so-called "natural rights" is a fiction. All rights are the creation of law. As Bentham put it: "[N]atural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense,—nonsense upon stilts." Jeremy Bentham, Anarchical Fallacies (1816).
Be that as it may, it was a fiction endorsed by our Founders.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 10:44 AM
Heckler's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil Kaine View Post
I still don't understand How a law can violate a persons rights if "All rights are the creation of law." How does this work?
If a law is created, it must meet constitutional requirements, or it could be a violation of rights under constitutional law....not some absolute law, there is none.

The Supreme Court reviews laws to be sure they meet that requirement.
__________________
"If you're going to tell people the truth, be funny or they'll kill you." -- Billy Wilder

"Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied." -- Otto Von Bismark
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 10:50 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil Kaine View Post
Are Your Rights GIVEN to you by your government? OR Are Rights inalienable? GIVEN to you by God?
Neither, the only rights you have are the ones that you are willing to fight for.

All rights are vested in the individual. Rights can only be taken away by your allowing those rights to be taken away. Sometimes you allow them to be taken away because you benefit from doing so, other times you allow them to be taken away because you are afraid of the consequences, but whatever the reasons, they are your rights.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 11:02 AM
Virgil Kaine's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 209
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heckler View Post
If a law is created, it must meet constitutional requirements, or it could be a violation of rights under constitutional law....not some absolute law, there is none.

The Supreme Court reviews laws to be sure they meet that requirement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
Neither, the only rights you have are the ones that you are willing to fight for.

All rights are vested in the individual. Rights can only be taken away by your allowing those rights to be taken away. Sometimes you allow them to be taken away because you benefit from doing so, other times you allow them to be taken away because you are afraid of the consequences, but whatever the reasons, they are your rights.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil Kaine View Post
I also can embrace the idea that nobody has the right to anything until they have the will and the power to stand up and take it as their right. Only the strong people and strong groups have rights. The weak, poor and underprivileged must live with what scraps the strong decide to give them! Now that is the kind of PROGRESSIVE government I can really get behind. No complicating things with stupid ideas of "right and wrong". Just what do I want and am I and my friends strong enough to get it! Truly Beautiful.
OK we can agree, THE STRONG RULE! AND THE WEAK DROOL!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 11:05 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT View Post
Prove your god exsits first, then we can consider that portion of your arguement.

It is the common consensus of the people that provide what constitutes "rights".
Prove that your God does not exist, or prove where life comes from, or prove how a star is born, or even describe what causes gravity. Therefore, because you can not prove where mankind comes from but only speculate.....you must not be real, as you are only the product of someones mental speculation. If man exists its not hard at all to conclude that God exists as well. BD

Last edited by bluedog : 05-20-2008 at 11:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 11:20 AM
Heckler's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil Kaine View Post
OK we can agree, THE STRONG RULE! AND THE WEAK DROOL!
No, I don't agree....compassion for other sentient beings needs to be a part of the equation.

Might does not equal right.
__________________
"If you're going to tell people the truth, be funny or they'll kill you." -- Billy Wilder

"Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied." -- Otto Von Bismark
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 11:30 AM
Virgil Kaine's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 209
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heckler View Post
...not some absolute law, there is none.
I thought we were on the same page? Then you throw this in;

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heckler View Post
No, I don't agree....compassion for other sentient beings needs to be a part of the equation.

Might does not equal right.
When you start talking about "other sentient beings" and right and wrong, it sounds like your pushing some kind of "God Thing"?
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 11:41 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heckler View Post
No, I don't agree....compassion for other sentient beings needs to be a part of the equation.

Might does not equal right.
For the vast majority of people, there is common cause in restricting the rights of the strong. After all, only a few people can be on top of the pyramid.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 11:56 AM
Heckler's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgil Kaine View Post
I thought we were on the same page? Then you throw this in;



When you start talking about "other sentient beings" and right and wrong, it sounds like your pushing some kind of "God Thing"?
Nope, I'm agnostic.

I do believe in having a set of ethics to live one's life by....

For me, the basic bottom line is "do what you will provided you harm no other"

(grossly simplified, but that is the basis)
__________________
"If you're going to tell people the truth, be funny or they'll kill you." -- Billy Wilder

"Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied." -- Otto Von Bismark
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings