 |
|

05-12-2008, 08:53 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Les Patterson
But think of the pluses!
Pederasts who play dress-up in gorgeous medieval drag would be out of job in the Vatican and its copycat Calvinazi churches.
Christian churches would be re-decorated by Karma Sutra statuary fucking in every sexual position imaginable.
The variety and taste of takeaway (take-out) food would be improved immensely.
The downside is that misogynistic misanthrophic imbeciles like Bluedog would be crying "In Krishna's Holy name we slay, Lord!" - instead of using his patently plagiarized Kike counterpart as a justification for their insane hatred of His creation.
However, rampant sperm-spitting Cobra-like cocks would be worshippped in his church up in the coves instead of copper-heads.
|
Its good to be called out for presenting the truth, it means that we are indeed having effect. It's also nice to think that Christianity rests squarely on my shoulders, as the only thing that I present are the "words" found to be exampled around 2000 years ago. For anything to have existed, nay not only existed but to have thrived in growing from just over a dozen or so supporters to encompass 1/3 the worlds population over two complete millennium must certainly have precedence over any liberal ideology of naturalism and secularism that has come to example only in the past century and demonstrated in the pure evil that it surely is, as everything evolves around the "ideology" of self interest, with true justice not even coming in a close second. As indeed man must have an example of righteous love and justice to lead him, for as the wise man of history once quoted, "Trust in the Lord with all thine heart: and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the Lord, and depart from evil." -- Proverbs 3:5-7 For surely it is not within man to direct his own paths, as they surely all lead to deception and unrighteousness. BD
Last edited by bluedog; 05-12-2008 at 09:03 PM.
|

05-12-2008, 09:54 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uptown Chicago and the Green Mill on a regular basis
Posts: 1,947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Les Patterson
But think of the pluses!
Pederasts who play dress-up in gorgeous medieval drag would be out of job in the Vatican and its copycat Calvinazi churches.
Christian churches would be re-decorated by Karma Sutra statuary fucking in every sexual position imaginable.
The variety and taste of takeaway (take-out) food would be improved immensely.
The downside is that misogynistic misanthrophic imbeciles like Bluedog would be crying "In Krishna's Holy name we slay, Lord!" - instead of using his patently plagiarized Kike counterpart as a justification for their insane hatred of His creation.
However, rampant sperm-spitting Cobra-like cocks would be worshippped in his church up in the coves instead of copper-heads.
|
If I am not mistaken, the rattle snake (defanged needless to say) is the "serpent" of choice in the West Virgina toolshed roadside "church". The same churches where incest and child rape are encouraged
__________________
Argue with some..IGNORE the stupid
Yeah it hurts, you have been fucked by an Elephant !
"Happamia, sanoi kettu pihlajanmarjoista kun ei niihin yltänyt" ("Sour, said the fox about rowan berries, being unable to reach them"
|

05-12-2008, 09:59 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,778
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback
If I am not mistaken, the rattle snake (defanged needless to say) is the "serpent" of choice in the West Virgina toolshed roadside "church". The same churches where incest and child rape are encouraged
|
I believe there is a sign above the door of those churches that say:
Yeshua's Tabernacle
All are welcome.
|

05-13-2008, 01:58 AM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the hills just north of Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,015
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback
If I am not mistaken, the rattle snake (defanged needless to say) is the "serpent" of choice in the West Virgina toolshed roadside "church". The same churches where incest and child rape are encouraged
|
Have you heard the old recording of me trying to get Bluedog And His Child Molesting Choir to sing Temptation last time I was in the States"
__________________
“Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw
|

05-13-2008, 03:03 AM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,420
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback
Interesting theory,
Where do you think the rise of Christianity (in whatever form it would have taken) might have taken hold?
Clearly, it would not have been in Europe.
The middle east, East Africa ?
What do you think ?
I think you nailed it on the neo pagan movement as caounter balance
|
I think Africa seems the most logical, but really its hard to tell. The roman empire was still semi-okay with people having different religions but Christians and Jews alike still had run-ins with empires like this despite the fact that at home they could practice whatever faith they wanted. so there si a good chance they would have moved away and not just started a stronger base else where in europe, far from the roman capital
__________________
Psych Majors are JUNG and HORNEY
Freedom is SEXY
|

05-13-2008, 06:33 AM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uptown Chicago and the Green Mill on a regular basis
Posts: 1,947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf_22
I think Africa seems the most logical, but really its hard to tell. The roman empire was still semi-okay with people having different religions but Christians and Jews alike still had run-ins with empires like this despite the fact that at home they could practice whatever faith they wanted. so there si a good chance they would have moved away and not just started a stronger base else where in europe, far from the roman capital
|
I would say, if indeed the chriswtian fath could indeed find a venue to expand from, you are correct. i still think however, it w2ould at best be in the limited state of a faith like Janeism or Zarathustranism is today, little more then a curiosity
It would be facinating to see white. english and romance language speakng people following pOoytheism (although it can be argued that christianity is polythyeism, but that is another discussion)
It is also interesting bto speculate if Islam would have ever manifested itself n ? My guess would be probably not
Quote:
Sir Les Patterson
Quote:
Have you heard the old recording of me trying to get Bluedog And His Child Molesting Choir to sing Temptation last time I was in the States"
|
THAT is funny stuff !
__________________
Argue with some..IGNORE the stupid
Yeah it hurts, you have been fucked by an Elephant !
"Happamia, sanoi kettu pihlajanmarjoista kun ei niihin yltänyt" ("Sour, said the fox about rowan berries, being unable to reach them"
|

05-13-2008, 09:38 AM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,778
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf_22
I think Africa seems the most logical, but really its hard to tell. The roman empire was still semi-okay with people having different religions but Christians and Jews alike still had run-ins with empires like this despite the fact that at home they could practice whatever faith they wanted. so there si a good chance they would have moved away and not just started a stronger base else where in europe, far from the roman capital
|
It was already in Europe and both Asia and Africa had states that already made their empires/nations official religion Christian well before the Romans did.
There was already a strong base in Europe. Just do a minimal amount of research and see for yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback
I would say, if indeed the chriswtian fath could indeed find a venue to expand from, you are correct. i still think however, it w2ould at best be in the limited state of a faith like Janeism or Zarathustranism is today, little more then a curiosity
It would be facinating to see white. english and romance language speakng people following pOoytheism (although it can be argued that christianity is polythyeism, but that is another discussion)
It is also interesting bto speculate if Islam would have ever manifested itself n ? My guess would be probably not
|
What don't you understand about the fact that Christianity was large and growing ever larger even before Constantine? What don't you undrestand that in cities all across the Roman world Christianity was getting stronger?
Maybe you should seek out people as ignorant as you are on this subject, but it may be tough to find.
|

05-13-2008, 10:02 AM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1
I believe there is a sign above the door of those churches that say:
Yeshua's Tabernacle
All are welcome.
|
Take note, of the attempted "stealth" in the use of a 3rd party proxy, so she will not get her pants directly "dusted" in any head to head debate? BD
|

05-13-2008, 10:10 AM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Les Patterson
Have you heard the old recording of me trying to get Bluedog And His Child Molesting Choir to sing Temptation last time I was in the States"
|
As you see demonstrated, there is no manipulation of lies that can withstand the truth presented in the Word of God and actual history. Evil simply cannot match wits with the author of the scripts. I just love the fact that those that was once presented in "open hostilities" toward one another have now been reduced to making an allied attempt at defending one another's obvious lies. I hope they get together and lie to one another till their little black hearts are made content. Of course this will not happen as one tries to out spin the other in representative falsehoods. Anyone got any "popcorn"? Set back and enjoy the show. BD
|

05-13-2008, 11:01 AM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,030
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback
Yupp...your aganda, it screams out loud, which is fine, so long as the context is understood
The history I am reviewing is based on neither an agena or revision, but on historical fact, and all your pro theology spin doesnt change that
What you are missing over and over (either by choice of by lack of knowledge) is that there was no early christian "church", nor anything that reembled one
There were Gnostics, Neo Pagan hybrids, and scattered groups of localized Hebrew converts who were all too happy to embrace a faith that lacked the traditional stringent dogma.
There was no "virgin birth" theory, no "son of god" concept, and for the most part, no "reserection". These all came into play in a sort of fantasy "snowball effect" in which one concept was required to justify the previous entry (IE, the "son of god" concived through human procreation ? UNTHINKABLE !)
Finally, your statement that early christians were Christians were "very well organized" is non secular fantasy, and frankly, not even viable in terms of geography, demographics and proximity.
No offense, but yours is a view that wants desperatly to cling to a romantisized vrew of Paul's spreading of the gospal, and Peter and james stand alone spirit. Inspiring yes, but sadly, historicly flawed
|
God you are an idiot. I have already said that Christianity was not a "popular movement", but because you can't argue any of my points, you have to ignore what I say and continue to argue what you wished I would say. That generally is a good sign that you have NO understanding of the issues and are merely parroting what you have read elsewhere (my guess is from fiction, or if you have a tad of intelligence, Elaine Pagels).
Nicene was not a revolution in Christian thought, it was the confirmation of a process that had begun over 200 years earlier. Nothing it confirmed in 320 was new, everything it confirmed had been a major if not dominate part of Christianity from the beginning. We know this because we have plenty of pre-Nicene texts that show this. The other sects, Montanism, Ebionism, and Gnosticism were not major movements, they were small movements confined to a writing elite. The only serious challenger to Orthodoxy were the Arians, and even this wasn't much of a challenge in that Arians were primarily based on the fringes of the empire, where as Orthodoxy was strongest in the core urban centers.
I am not arguing that Constantine's conversion wasn't important, it was, but at the same time to say that if he hadn't converted Christianity would have died out is just plain wrong. All major changes are evolutionary in process, and Constantine's conversion was just another step along this evolution (which continued for another 500 years, and indeed is still occurring). If you cared to study this period, you would discover why Christianity won, and what it says about humanity. But you don't care to know, you rather have your simplistic good guys and bad guys, because, it seems, that is all you can handle.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|