Originally Posted by ricechickie

They can't be accurate; they detect no personality whatsoever!

(I'm joking dear; I might not like your personality, but it's definitely THERE)

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

We understand exactly what she meant Nathan, it's just that much of what she wrote brushes against your Right/Libertarian nature, and thus you , as a matter of human nature, you feel obligated to make her so called philosophy your own

The problem is, it is nothing more then Pez dispenser quasi intellect, intended to appeal to the desperation of those who feel a need to substitute a “feel good by feeling bad” mindset for a place within the mainstream culture

Randists are members of an “exclusive” club with “exclusive” insights, that no one else has the slightest interest in joining, and everyone else has figured out is a con game

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

Oh,,,were you under the impression that it was some secret that I used that SN foir a bit ?
There were others too...do you need a list ?
You see, if you were as observant as you seem to think you are, you would know I have often mocked the importance some place on their on line "IDENTITY" by using different names, and made light of the fact that there have been those who created fake names to stick up for "themselves"
I nver hid who I was,,regardless of the SN..in fact, I made sure everyone knew

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

Nazism was founded, among other things, upon ANTI collectivism.

Originally Posted by Dom1

What advocates of altruism were gassed? Don't say communists, because they weren't advocates of altruism (see Bolsheviks).

Not only that, fascism is associated with collectivism . . . . . nice job fatty! You really did a great job there!

Not only was fascism NOT founded as an anti-collectivism, it is associated with collectivism. Look it up, I am right.

This is why I enjoy it when you keep posting on yoru losing arguments, because when you are given enough rope you eventually hang yourself.

Originally Posted by Heckler

That is correct, Mussolini considered it a collectivist movement, but NOT a socialist movement.....

It had strong elements of NATIONALISM which, really is the core of it IMO.
Being as the fascists were rabidly anti communist, it is kind of hard to equate them with most modern leftists movements....

It's funny that both the left and right use fascist as a slam against the other.....and even funnier that it actually works.

Originally Posted by Dom1

Collectivism:

any of several types of social organization in which the individual is seen as being subordinate to a social collectivity such as a state, a nation, a race, or a social class. Collectivism may be contrasted with individualism, in which the rights and interests of the individual are emphasized

You are impressively wrong, fatty. Fascism is a form of collectivism and you, as you usually do, got it completely reversed.

You said fascism was anti-collectivism . . . . BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now, I fully expect you to try to dig yourself out of this hole and then, inevitably, dig yourself a bigger one.

Originally Posted by Dom1

I am not even talking about left and right, that is what fatty was trying to do and maybe tht is part of the reason she has such a screwed up argument.

I didn't use fascism as a slam against anyone, all I am stating is the fact that fascism is a form of collectivism, which goes to show that fatty doesn't know very much about the things she talks about.

Being a collectivist movement, Rand would be diametrically opposed to fascism. Again, the opposite of what fatty contends.

Turns out if you are looking for the right answer to something you just look at what the exact opposite of what fatty posts and you will find it.

Originally Posted by ricechickie

I'm sure he feels grateful at the temporary reprieve. (IRONY)

Don't you see the inherent immaturity of not only the ignore list, but the broadcasting of who is on such a list?

Nah, probably not.

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

Looks like the silly original post has now been completly debunked.

As we have established, Randism has been rejected as faux quisi intelect by virtually all educated venues.

A see one particular slobbering fat fuk, who CLEARLY has never actually read Rand, is still taling to himself (kooko, kooko) , but as ususal, no one takes the loser sereously anyway, and most of us have him on the IGGY shitcan list anyway

On to the next silly ass thread, created by the next kook

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

Nuff said....case closed

Buit He'll post again, he cant hewl himself, becuise he is obsessed..watch and see...LOL

Such a good fat ass puppetboy

Originally Posted by Dom1

With exception of the OP, nobody claimed that she was the greatest philospher of all time.

What has been thoroughly discredited though was your claim that the Nazis were anti-collectivists, which was totally, 100% wrong. Thus, your claim that Rand promotes some sort of fascist thought is also wrong.