Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > Religion and Philosophy
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:18 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,723
Default

The facts of "history actual" conclude that most prominent "Philosopher" of all time was indeed Christ Jesus. Whom else can boast of consuming 1/3 the world's population by propagating such philosophy? Just what percentage of the world population did Aynd Rand garner? BD
Major religious groups - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:34 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback View Post
Dude..Please...make no mistake, I am smarter then you, more educated then you, and better read then you

With that obvious fact out of the way….I read the fountainhead in 7th grade, Atlas shrugged in high school, and I have her testimony before the committee on anti American activity and her New Yorker interview on objective ethics almost committed to memory

Apparently you are one of the simpletons who were conned by her quasi intellect and faux analysis.
Good thing you were not in Berlin CIRCA 1939, you would have been in a brown shirt no doubt

Try harder and do better
LOL, better educated? Hardly. Unless you have a PHD, you are probably nowhere close. Better read? Doubtful. And definitely not based on your posts.

Your calling Rand's philosophy fascist is a joke. Fascism is merely a nationalistic form of collectivism and that of course is what Rand was against. That you cannot understand such a simple statement shows that "IF" you read Rand you certainly have no understanding of it.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:38 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog View Post
The facts of "history actual" conclude that most prominent "Philosopher" of all time was indeed Christ Jesus. Whom else can boast of consuming 1/3 the world's population by propagating such philosophy? Just what percentage of the world population did Aynd Rand garner? BD
Major religious groups - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Islam has about 1/3rd as well, so what does that say about Mohammad?

Rand has few followers, however her impact has been great. In many surveys people have rated "Atlas Shrugged" as the second most influential work in their lives behind the bible.

I am by no means an objectivist, and I find Rand to be an extremely flawed individual. However, to deny the impact she has had intellectually in the US in the 20th century is ignorant, and as such she needs to be studied like Marx should be studied.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:47 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
Islam has about 1/3rd as well, so what does that say about Mohammad?

Rand has few followers, however her impact has been great. In many surveys people have rated "Atlas Shrugged" as the second most influential work in their lives behind the bible.

I am by no means an objectivist, and I find Rand to be an extremely flawed individual. However, to deny the impact she has had intellectually in the US in the 20th century is ignorant, and as such she needs to be studied like Marx should be studied.
History actual tells the "fact" that Mohammad parroted his false ideology from the coffers of the Judeo-Christian philosophy some 700 years after the fact thereof. And about is not an actual number as Christianity engulfs 33.06% as compared to just 20.28% of Muslim representation...that is if you really want to deal in "facts". BD
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:51 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog View Post
History actual tells the "fact" that Mohammad parroted his false ideology from the coffers of the Judeo-Christian philosophy some 700 years after the fact thereof. And about is not an actual number as Christianity engulfs 33.06% as compared to just 20.28% of Muslim representation...that is if you really want to deal in "facts". BD
Fine, 20% as opposed to 33%, pretty impressive that Islam is even that close given the 700 year head start of Christianity and that Islam did not have 19th century imperialism backing it.

I only brought up Islam because I found your original post stupid. Truth is truth regardless of the number of people who don't believe it. Pointing to numbers as proof of anything intellectually is an invalid argument.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:52 PM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburbanite View Post
of course beethoven is better than Mozart.
And Paul McCartney is better than both
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:55 PM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback View Post
Rand was a fraud, a whack job, an ego maniac and an ethicly bankrupt fascist.
Her entire quasi philosophy was based on a total misrepresentation of human nature, flawed logic, and psuedo intellect with faux terminnology and syntax, that her following of simpletions sucked down like the unsweetend kool aid it was.
Rand was a con artist who had a message that made the week minded feel smart, and the wek of heart feel stong. Hers was a pat on the shoulder to the frustrated bitter clinicly depressed of the world saying, "shhhhhhhh...only WE know the truth of hos things should be...wink" As if to tell them that their "gratification of self" was all they needed.
A great collection of faux intellect..little more

Everyone up until this post has been calm, rational, measured and intelligent, even those who disagree with each other. You, however, come into the room, screeching, frailing and mindlessly attacking all that don't fit your mold.

Will everyone agree this poster is perhaps the less effective in this thread ever?
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 01:59 PM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 8,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
She didn't, in her "paradise" there were tons of "average" people as well. The way to get in wasn't to be an "elite" but to do the best one could with what they had and to stand on one's own two feet. In short, it was an attitude, not an aptitude.
Remember the part in Atlas Shrugged when Dagney Taggert has crashed in the world created by John Galt. One of the inhabitants is a woman who says all she wants to do is to be the best at raising her children and a collectivist society does not allow her to do that. So, you are absolutely correct in your assessment.
__________________
Its better to have fussed and crabbed then never to have fussed at all - Lucy
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 02:06 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
Fine, 20% as opposed to 33%, pretty impressive that Islam is even that close given the 700 year head start of Christianity and that Islam did not have 19th century imperialism backing it.

I only brought up Islam because I found your original post stupid. Truth is truth regardless of the number of people who don't believe it. Pointing to numbers as proof of anything intellectually is an invalid argument.
The truth apparently does not matter to many, as Islam can absolutely be proven to be false by the very Holy Bible that it claims to gestate from. And truth was not even being considered in the fact of who is the greatest example of any philosopher in history....or you would bend your will to the fact thereof as proven in the actual physical reality of statistical information...no? BD
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 02:17 PM
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
I only brought up Islam because I found your original post stupid. Truth is truth regardless of the number of people who don't believe it. Pointing to numbers as proof of anything intellectually is an invalid argument.
Worshiping the unknowable, sounds like theism to me. And you're wrong, there is no such thing as Truth, regardless of the word existing and any number of facts or people believing it. Pointing to Truth is intellectually invalid, especially when you don't know it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings