Agnostics are pussies

Uncensored2008 · #**181** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rumpelforskin

Never heard the word before. Nor does Dictionary.com list it. With your Mexican heritage, you probably meant "pendejo".

I'm surprised you hadn't heard it. It's an arcane term for pedophile.

As for my Mexican heritage; I've heard of Carlos O'Brian, but never Pedro Mueller....

percysunshine · #**182** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncensored2008

I'm surprised you hadn't heard it. It's an arcane term for pedophile.

As for my Mexican heritage; I've heard of Carlos O'Brian, but never Pedro Mueller....

Hint; Rumplforskin is Republicans_happen.

TakuanSoho · #**183** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by percysunshine

Hint; Rumplforskin is Republicans_happen.

No, he's MC, not RH.

percysunshine · #**184** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

No, he's MC, not RH.

How do you know? Not that they are that different.

I remember a Florida reference, and MC is up north.

TakuanSoho · #**185** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by percysunshine

How do you know? Not that they are that different.

I remember a Florida reference, and MC is up north.

But there were enough. RH has been gone for far too long and would not have followed Ricie over here. MC was still on the Yahoo board and could have followed. Also his religious, Israeli, and border issues are all MCs.

percysunshine · #**186** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

But there were enough. RH has been gone for far too long and would not have followed Ricie over here. MC was still on the Yahoo board and could have followed. Also his religious, Israeli, and border issues are all MCs.

Well, they both start with the letter 'R'...chuckle

Uncensored2008 · #**187** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

No, he's MC, not RH.

I think you're both right.

Which means Harley was right. IE, RH and MC are simply manifestations of the same schizo.

I don't usually go in for the conspiracies, but a faked stroke isn't exactly the act of a sane person.

MC has deep, deep issues.

George O Well · #**188** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Why is it not acceptable to claim to know whether god exists or not?

>>>Ah, er, because you DON'T know. "Claiming" to know ain't the same as "knowing".

George O Well · #**189** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 05:36 PM

Quote:

What's wrong with not knowing?

>>>You don't become the leader of great movements by saying "I don't know". Who's going to follow someone who says "I don't know"? And it is VERY important to have followers.

r8dmarshall · #**190** (**permalink**) 04-28-2008, 06:13 PM

Pro and con regarding theism are two opposite ends of the spectrum. One belives in supernatural and the other does not. Each feels they ar correct in their belief and tendtodisrespect the other's beliefs.

the agnostic is stuck in the middle, but that is the only truly honest and credible position. Since selfrightousness is not involved in being agnostic it is the only purely logical position logical. I say that because there is, and will be not imperical proof without belief in the supernatural.

a person who is unable to come to either thesim or athesim is in good conscience in his position andshould be comended for his truthfull stance rather than lie one way or the other simply tofit in.