Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45
Ah, that is the question is it not? Who does decide what is right and wrong. If you sincerely believe your statement t hat its the rich and powerful then you believe that "might makes right". This philosophical belief is what gave us Hitler. He was a strong follower of Nietchze.
|
When did I say I suppor the current method of making law for society?
I do NOT support might makes right, just suggesting that is how it currently happens......
Quote:
|
If there is no universal truth is being "moral" meaningful? You said your morality is do no harm to another. What if my morality was "Do nothing that would stop me from doing what I would want"?
|
Then I wouldn't like you very much, and would probably steer clear of you!
People DO have different moralities, sometimes none. Do I like them all? No.
Quote:
Laws do not constitute morality. For example 50 years ago it was illegal to be homosexual in many states. The entire gay rights movement started because of a police raid on the gay club Stonewall in Greenwich Village NY. Today we would not think of passing anti gay laws. In another fifty years who knows, we may be back to those laws.
No, I think there must be an outside influence controlling what is and isn't moral for all mankind.
|
Correct, law and morality are not equivalent. One is individual, the other is societal...IMO....
then we'll have to agree to disagree....because I see no evidence of some universal outside influence.....
As I pointed out, I'm Agnostic.....
Unfortunately, when dealing with humanity, it isn't all good!