Quote:
Originally Posted by Reynard1967
Who would have thought....100% secular humanist.....The next closest was budda in with a whopping 18% , And Catholic last with 2%. Better luck next time God.
|
Humanism Exposed - Part I
HUMANISM EXPOSED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART ONE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Man is the measure of all things.” Protagoras of Abdera (c. 480-411 BC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Secular Humanistic Ideal, the Humanistic Model or Philosophy of Secular Humanism is not new. It essentially means man (and woman) as Autonomous, as the "Center of all things and the Universe". Today, it serves as a fully functioning "secular religion" at schools and major universties. Let us define it, and take a look at it historically right up to our own day.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A WORKING DEFINITION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are several variations of "Secular" Humanism, both within and without the Assemblies of Yeshua (Jesus). Within these variations, there is no True Spiritual Authority represented by the Gift of Male Pastor-Teacher. True Spiritual Authority is usurped and some form of Humanistic authority (or "unisex") is substituted. In all of these systems unregenerate man uses a system of "human reason" and human will is exalted as supreme.
The altered variation of Humanism called CHRISTIAN HUMANISM has also found its way into the Assemblies.
Today, taken as "Secular" Humanist philosophy, the phrases "everything is relative" [1] and "there are no absolutes" are two that are usually foremost. The statement "there are no absolutes" immediately denies the Creator AS Absolute. Man is therefore left with an impersonal "relativistic" universe that is neutral and silent concerning Right and wrong OR Good and evil. A relativistic universe is silent on these issues. At this point, man places himself in charge.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE FIRST DECEPTION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humanistic man first attempts to "create" an area where G-d is "excluded", and that he calls "secular". This is done in his own imagination, and others are encouraged to believe this has actually happened. As Van Til correctly pointed out, however, man is always working with "borrowed capital" because G-d has actually Created everything Humanistic man uses. Man is not truly automomous as he imagines. This becomes the first self-deception. If the individual believes this (that there exists a "secular" area in space and time), then he is primed to receive other distortions.[2]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By inventing his own "imaginary area", this then conveniently seems to place Humanistic man "in charge of his own destiny", and whatever he\she chooses to call "good" or "evil" is based upon some "code of ethics", twisting of Scripture, "feelings", "popularity", "herd instinct" or however he\she may choose to interpret things "rationally", "statistically" or "scientifically" at any given point in time. This can lead to variable "Sociological Law" which may change from "expert opinion" to "expert opinion", "psychological theory" to psychological theory", poll to poll, "statistical analysis" to "statistical analysis". Humanists sometimes refer to this as "the marriage of science and law".
BUT FORTUNATELY.......UNLIKE SPARKS er I mean JAN........I'm not only a conspiracy EXPOSER (tattletail)........I'm a SCIENTIST TOO
The Godscience Manifesto
Godscience is a call for scientific recognition of evidence that confirms what most people already know: that God and an afterlife actually exist, and that the universe he's created is not only stranger than we think, it's stranger than we could ever imagine.
Live Search: MATHEMATICAL PROOF FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
PROOF OF THE LEMMA 'SOME BEING IS ETERNAL' (Functional – Calculus of First – Order )
The Premisses
Some being presently exists.
If some being presently exists, then either some being is eternal (has always existed), or all beings which (presently) exist have risen out of nothing.
If some being presently exists, then either that (presently) existent being is a necessary being, or that (presently) existent being is a contingent being.
If some (presently) existent being is a necessary being, then some being is eternal.
If some (presently) existent being is a contingent being, then some beings which (presently) exist have not risen out of nothing.
Mathematical Representation
Let Ix = x presently exists (is existent).
Ex = x is eternal (has always existed).
Nx = x has risen out of nothing.
Px = x is a necessary being ('exists in the necessity of its own nature': essence.º . existence).
Qx = x is a contingent being ('sometimes in being and sometimes not').
Logical Analysis
1. ($ x) (Ix) - Given.
2. ($ x) (Ix) .è . ($ x) (Ex) Ñ (x) (Ix è Nx) - Given.
3. ($ x) (Ix) .è . ($ x) (Ix · Px) Ñ ($ x) (Ix · Qx) - Given.
4. ($ x) (lx · Px) è ($ x) (Ex) - Given.
5. ($ x) (Ix · Qx) è ($ x) (Ix · ~ Nx) - Given.
6. ($ x) (Ix · Px) Ñ ($ x) (Ix · Qx) - 1, 3 M.P. (Modus Ponens).
7. ($ x) (Ex) Ñ ($ x) (Ix · ~ Nx) - 4, 5, 6 C.D. (Constructive Dilemma,
Complex).
8. ($ x) (Ex) Ñ (x) (Ix è Nx) - 1, 2 M.P.
9. ~ ($ x) (Ex) .è . ($ x) (Ix · ~ Nx) - 7, Impl. (Implication).
10. (x) (Ix è Nx) Ñ ($ x) (Ex) - 8, Com. (Commutation).
11. ~ (x) (Ix è Nx ) .è . ($ x) (Ex) - 10, Impl.
12. ($ x) (lx · ~ Nx) .è . ($ x) (Ex) - 11, Q.N. (Quantification Negation:
($ x) (Ix · ~ Nx) .º . ~ (x) (Ix è Nx) )
13. ~ ($ x) (Ex) .è . ($ x) (Ex) - 9, 12 H.S. (Hypothetical Syllogism).
14. ($ x) (Ex) Ñ ($ x) (Ex) -13, Impl.
15. ($ x) (Ex) - 14, Taut. (Tautology).
SOME BEING IS ETERNAL. [Q.E.D.]
This theorem (lemma) is the major premiss in the mathematical proof of 'Some One Unchangeable and Independent Being is Eternal'.
SPIRITUAL NATURE OF THE HUMAN SOUL
Boolean Algebra: Proof of 'I am a spiritual substance'.
The Premisses
I am (exist). - Given ( ¶ I. B. 3, I. C. 3.3, I. D. 3.6).
If I am, then I am either a material substance or I am spiritual substance.
If I am a material substance, then all my 'thoughts' are sensory in nature (non – intellectual; non – abstract).
Some of my 'thoughts' are not sensory in nature. ‡
‡ But rather intellectual or abstract in nature, 'conceptio intellectus'.
The human intellect apprehends its object in universal and abstractive fashion independently of material conditions. Hence, intellectual activity is immaterial or purely spiritual. (3)
And the Angelic Doctor observes that 'The proper operation of man as man is the activity of the intellect' ('Propria autem operatio hominis inquantum homo, est intelligere') (4)
The object of the intellect is the universal ('intellectus est universalium'), whereas sense can grasp only the particular ('sensus est particularium').
And as both the Angelic Doctor and Aristotle (the 'Philosopher') have affirmed: 'homo est animal rationale' ('Man is a rational animal').
Mathematical Representation
Let E = I am.
P = I am a material substance.
Q = I am a spiritual substance.
R = All my 'thoughts' are sensory in nature.
Logical Analysis
E = 1
['Order' Relation a C b defined: For every a and b in
E C PQ' + QP'
a Boolean Algebra B, a C b if and only if ab' = 0 :
P C R
a C b .º . ab' = 0 ]
R = 0
_______________
PQ + P'Q' = 0
PR' = 0
R = 0
_______________
PR' = 0
+ R = 0
______________
R +
PR' = 0
[Of Form AX + BX' = 0 ; B C X C A'; B C A';
P C R C (1) '
AB = 0 ]
P C (1) '
(1) (P) = 0 [Eliminant of R]
P = 0 ('I am not a material substance', for
________
PQ + P'Q' = 0
+ P = 0
____________________
P + PQ + P'Q' = 0
(Q + 1) P + Q'P' = 0
[Of Form AX + BX'=0 ; B C X C A'; B C A';
(1)P + Q'P' = 0
AB = 0 ]
Q' C P C (1) '
Q' C (1) '
(1) (Q') = 0 [Eliminant of P]
Q' = 0
"One White Duck / 0^{10} = Nothing At All"
YouTube - Jethro Tull - One White Duck
one white duck
on your wall.
Isn't it just too damn real?
YouTube - I can't make you love me.
BITE ME SPARKS
Belief-O-Matic :-)
LMAO....hey ya fuckin Indian ;-)
you posted 
Linear Mode
