Hey.

I am not even asking for proof that he lied.

I know that is waaaaaaay over your little brain.

How about just telling me one of his lies?

I mean I know that you have Bush-Derangement-Syndrome {BDS} so you should be able to lay down a couple of hundred of 'em without really breaking a sweat


and

all


I


Want

is

one

little

or

big

lie.

INSTEAD OF SLINGING INSULTS - Provide a deliberate lie by Bush ...

__________________

"Don't Bother Visiting http://Politics.TheBasicsAbout.com - It's Too Different For You!"

They can't do ANYTHING but quote the Liberal B.S. websites and parrot their false statements.

They CAN NOT make a decision on their own research!

__________________

"Don't Bother Visiting http://Politics.TheBasicsAbout.com - It's Too Different For You!"

Seems that that is true.

Truth be told ... I would rather be a Facist than a Communist supported Socialist!

__________________________________________________

fascist

1921, from It. partito nazionale fascista, the anti-communist political movement organized 1919

__________________

"Don't Bother Visiting http://Politics.TheBasicsAbout.com - It's Too Different For You!"

LIES: FACTS:


WMDs




Saddam Hussein was a threat because he could have given weapons of mass destruction to terrorist enemies. (Second Debate)

If we failed to act in Iraq, the dictator's weapons of mass destruction programs would continue to this day." (2004 State of the Union)

According to the CIA’s Duelfer’s Report Iraq

HAD NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION TO GIVE OUT.

“had no . . . strategy or plan for the revival of WMD after sanctions” ended.

Iraq failed “to acquire long range delivery systems “to replace inventory exhausted in the Iran/Iraq war.”

The survey group “uncovered no evidence Iraq retained Scud-variant missiles” and “documentation suggests that Iraq did not retain such missiles after 1991.”

Iraq’s nuclear program ended in 1991 following the Gulf War.

“Initial, Saddam chose to conceal his nuclear program in its entirety. . . [but] [a]ggressive UN inspections after Desert Storm forced Saddam to admit the existence of the program and destroy or surrender compenents of the program.”

“Iraq unilaterally destroyed is undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Bagdad resumed production of chemical munitions therafter.”

“With the economy at rock bottom in late 1995 . . . Baghdad [destroyed undeclared stocks of biological weapons] and abandoned its existing BW [biological warfare] program in the belief it constituted a potential embarrassment” which would undercut any ability to lift sanctions.

In spite of exhaustive investigation, ISG found no evidence that Iraq possessed, or was developing BW agent product systems mounted on road vehicles or railway wagons.”
Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD; Center for American Prograss State of the Union Analysis.:

“[T]he Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations. Had we failed to act, the dictator’s weapons of mass destruction programs would continue to this day.”

No WMDs have been after ten months. David Kay reported that there is no evidence that Iraq had an active nuclear or biological weapons program and Iraq did not have an “ongoing centrally controlled chemical weapons program.” (88)

“And when David Kay goes in and says we haven’t found stockpiles yet, and there’s theories as to where the weapons went. They could have been destroyed during the war. . . They could be hidden. They could have been transported to another country, and we’ll find out.

Kay didn’t attribute the absences of stockpiles to their destruction or transportation to another country, Kay found that they were never produced and hadn’t been produced since 1991. (83)

On May 29, 2003, during a visit to Poland, President Bush declared that the U.S. had “found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories. . . . They’re illegal. They’re against the United Nations resolutions, and we’ve so far discovered two.”

On June 1, 2003, Bush proclaimed that “we found a biological laboratory in Iraq which the UN prohibited.”


A review by US and UK experts has found this claim to be false. The mobile trailers at issue were facilities to fill weather balloons. (21)


In his October address, Bush claimed that the “evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group of his ‘nuclear mujahedeen,’ his nuclear holy warriors.”


In October 2002 Bush also stated, “[Iraq] is moving ever closer to developing a nuclear weapon.”

As explained by the Washington Post, “Bush and others often alleged that President Hussein held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, but did not disclose that the known work of the scientists was largely benign.” (32)


Also in October 2002, the State Department’s Intelligence and Research Department told the White House that its WMD conclusions were inaccurate, reporting that “the activities we have detected do not . . .add up to a compelling case that Iraq is currently pursuing . . . an integrated and comprehensive approach to acquiring nuclear weapons.” This conclusion was reiterated to Secretary Powell before his presentation to the UN Security Council. (79)


www.bushlies.net

__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall

Don't fool yourself...if they had even one iota of proof...that the commander in chief...had in fact lied.....the left would be...as we speak...calling special make up artist from hollywood........for the cameras..that surely would be rolled out on the floor......with the hearings to start....there would not be enough hair moose in the world...to cover this event...some are drooling as I type...... just thinking about it........BD

In September 2002, Bush claimed an International Atomic Energy Agency report stated that Iraq was “six months away from developing a [nuclear] weapon.” (SOU)


At least four times during the fall of 2002, President Bush, Secretary Rumsfeld and other administration officials invoked the specter of a “mushroom cloud” to argue that Iraq’s nuclear ambitions were a threat to the US homeland.


On August 26, 2002, Cheney claimed Hussein had the nuclear capability to directly threaten “anyone he chooses, in his own region or beyond.”


No such report exists. A 1998 report concluded that there “are no indications that there remains in Iraq any physical capability for the production of weapon-usable nuclear material of any practical significance."


In 2003, IAEA inspectors have found no evidence of a nuclear program.

The CIA concurred with this analysis. In fact, its January 2002 review of WMD proliferation warned of a threat from North Korea, but not Iraq. (2)


In addition, the vice chairman of the National Intelligence Council explained that the CIA concluded that Iraq would not have nuclear weapons until the end of the decade – not within six months. (62)


Secretary Rumsfeld now claims the US did not go to war “because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq’s pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. We acted because we saw the existing evidence in a new light – through the prism of our experience on 9/11.” (24)


David Kay’s interim report found no evidence of an active nuclear program and that it would have taken Iraq five to seven years to develop a nuclear weapon. (49)


President Bush and Secretary Powell repeatedly claimed they had evidence that Iraq attempted to buy 500 tons of uranium oxide from Niger, which can be used to make fuel for nuclear reactors.


President Bush and Secretary Powell repeatedly claimed they had evidence that Iraq attempted to buy 500 tons of uranium oxide from Niger, which can be used to make fuel for nuclear reactors.

__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall

Me too....

Occams

how come all the colorcodes and longwindedness.

It is a simple question.

I don't want to sift through all of your fucking propaganda to get the answer to a simple question.




My guess is that you write pages and pages of crap becuase you STILL cannot answer the simple question