Bush lies So often and in so many different ways that I've never had the patience to keep a list of them. However, when I write something and include the generalization that Bush lies, some readers will write in and say, "Oh, yeh? What did he lie about? I don't believe it." What follows, then, is an informal listing of just some of the lies he typically tells, starting from 2/01. Now, of course, we all know that Gore lies, Lott lies, Cheney lies, etc. But the difference between those liars and Bush is the Resident tells us that he is telling the truth when he is lying. Hence, he will tell us what he is going to do, like get his proposed tax cut from the surplus, then try to get his proposed tax cut from military and medicare funds, instead. Or, once he has actually begun a program, tell us lies about how or why the program has begun. Or tell a closed-door Dem meeting something and then swear up and down the next day that he didn't say it. Or saying, "Yes, Mam" and meaning "No, Mam." Or having a spinner say the opposite the next day. Or, or...you get the idea.

Some Bush backers claim he's not a liar, he's just not very bright and doesn't remember things very well. That may be true, but we're sure Bush would not allow such an excuse in his "responsibility era." We're sure Bush would agree that if he's that dumb, he shouldn't be President. Other Bush backers claim that some of his lies are "technically correct" or "tailored to fit the audience," or some such circumlocution. What they're talking about are lies of omission rather than lies of commission. In lies of omission it's what they imply, not what they say. For example, the other evening Bush told Congress and the American people that he was putting a "lock box" on Social Security. Now, it's very clear that Bush wanted us to feel secure in the belief that he was protecting all of our Social Security funds for the future. No question, right? Yet, the very next day when his budget book was released, we learned that Bush told a lie of omission. What he didn't tell Congress and the American people is that he would later take from $.6 to $1 trillion out of that "lock box" to cover his tax cuts. No doubt, Bush lied. He wanted folks to believe something that he knew was not true. Of course, politicians do this all the time. It's second nature. In sum, the thing that really bothers us about Bush's lies is that he is also a hypocrite and pretends he's above lying. As a liar, he reinforces our assumptions about politicians. As a hypocrite, he reinforces our assumptions about his character.

Not a single lie in all that claptrap.

What a moron.

Orwell was warning about the fucking socialists and communists by the way.

__________________

GOD BLESS AMERICA

Shouldn't you be at Mass?

I went to mass at 10 am.

__________________

GOD BLESS AMERICA

still not a single lie.

what a bunch of fucking losers the liberals on this site are.

you are a bunch of brainless fucking cowards.

__________________

GOD BLESS AMERICA

Says the kid hiding behind the curtain... Dude... you have no brain when it comes to politics. You come in to just shoot off your mouth, and say any stupid thing. You find yourself pleased when it comes to this, because to you, it's just like being in school, talking in your little groups, because no teen ever had any form of logic, nor proof in their arguement. What they had were philosophies, and made-up rules, exactly made to separate themselves from their fears. "What they don't understand, they fear... what they fear, they destroy" thus it has been for centuries, and still, it prospers. Now, I really don't expect you to understand any of this, and I fully expect you to come up with a childish remark sounding like "oh yeah #%@#" because "who'd ever think you were childish if you used so many curseries in a sentance?" I am telling you this, so others can see, what I see, without having to take their precious time to read your sickening remarks. Or maybe I should urge them to read your remarks so that they can start ignoring you, because all YOU want ever, is attention. If you want me to play nice with you, go and do some research on what you want to play, and Maybe I'll listen. until then, go back to your kiddy friends on meez, gaia, or myspace.

__________________
"(It's like) a hokey Disney movie or lifetime movie... only it's real."--Sharon Osborne talking about Sarah Palin on Ellen.

FactCheck proves McCain is a fuck liar.

FactCheck.org: "He Lied" About Bill Ayers?

"He Lied" About Bill Ayers?
October 10, 2008
McCain cranks out some false and misleading attacks on Obama's connection to a 1960s radical.
Summary
In a TV ad, McCain says Obama "lied" about his association with William Ayers, a former bomb-setting, anti-war radical from the 1960s and '70s. We find McCain's claim to be groundless. New details have recently come to light, but nothing Obama said previously has been shown to be false.

In a Web ad and in repeated attacks from the stump, McCain describes the two as associates, and Palin claims they "pal around" together. But so far as is known, their relationship was never very close. An Obama spokesman says they last saw each other in a chance encounter on the street more than a year ago.

McCain says in an Internet ad that the two "ran a radical 'education' foundation" in Chicago. But the supposedly "radical" group was supported by a Republican governor and included on its board prominent local civic leaders, including one former Nixon administration official who has given $1,500 to McCain's campaign this year. Education Week says the group's work "reflected mainstream thinking" among school reformers. The group was the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, started by a $49 million grant from the Annenberg Foundation, which was established by the publisher Walter Annenberg, a prominent Republican whose widow, Leonore, is a contributor to the McCain campaign.

(FactCheck.org, which is nonpartisan, also receives funding from the Annenberg Foundation. But we are in no way connected to the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which finished its work long before we came into being in late 2003.)

For full details, please read on to our Analysis section.

There are several pages of detailed analysis at the link.