Us troops kill civilians

I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right · #11 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jody

NO STUPID... what he is saying is what goes around..... will come around and this time we are no longer innocent. We have killed nearly a million people now and WHEN we are attacked again it will be because of our OCCUPATION of a Muslim state.

Right idiot...it was our OCCUPATION of a Muslim state that caused 9/11...and the twin towers bombing before that...seems like you SICKO`s can`t wait for a new terrorist attack on America to give credence to your twisted political views..SHAME ON YOU!

I have question for your Jody... who funded these terrorists originally? WE DID... WE FUNDED OSAMA BIN LADEN...

You think this happened just out of the blue?

Jody · #12 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 09:52 PM

Of course this is because big bad bush wit his weathuh masheen KNOCK thooose levys down and let da wata in ! Give me a friggin break man .

Right On brother...Power to the people!

I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right · #13 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdnor

Oh horse crap ! How many HUNDREDS of BILLIONS is it going to take to shut the libs up about New Orleans ? Of course this is because big bad bush wit his weathuh masheen KNOCK thooose levys down and let da wata in ! Give me a friggin break man . Rasta is right about one thing , it's not IF it happens , it's when ! One more reason to show no mercy to our enemies and kill them .

You people are JUST AS DANGEROUS actually MORE SO than the terrorists because you have access to bigger weapons than they do.

So you don't mind all of the KILLING that has happened in Iraq? Even though they DID NOTHING TO YOU...

I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right · #14 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 09:55 PM

Last time I checked.... Most of the terrorists were Saudis. Any comments?

Jody · #15 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 10:08 PM

NO STUPID... what he is saying is what goes around..... will come around and this time we are no longer innocent. We have killed nearly a million people now and WHEN we are attacked again it will be because of our OCCUPATION of a Muslim state.

What sick shit!

Kix · #16 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 10:10 PM

The chickens already came home to roost; their disguised as liberals.

rdnor · #17 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right

Last time I checked.... Most of the terrorists were Saudis. Any comments?

Yeah , and a lot of the are Syrian , Iranian , Jordanian , Palestinian , Egyptian , British , American , Australian...etc . Any COMMENTS . I received a call from Baghdad yesterday , it was a friend of my nephew's . I will not say where he works but I will say that I take HIS word for what it is . He paints a COMPLETELY different world that the liberal media . What is going on over there is changing rapidly and the libs are going to have to eat much crow .

rdnor · #18 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right

You people are JUST AS DANGEROUS actually MORE SO than the terrorists because you have access to bigger weapons than they do.

So you don't mind all of the KILLING that has happened in Iraq? Even though they DID NOTHING TO YOU...

Let's get this straight , I have my own reasons to hate war . Even though I hate war , I want to kill people that want to kill me . End of story .

justme · #19 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skinny Fatts

Don't worry about IHNR, Jody. She'll calm down in a bit after she takes her pills.

IHNR is a she?????? natural or pre-op?

Kix · #20 (**permalink**) 03-04-2007, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdnor

I can't help but think , if the civilian population would help with intel , instead of cowering in fear of the terrorists , this would not happen so often . This a common tactic of the coward bastards , intimidate and terrorize the civilians into silence or flat out cooperation . They all look the same to soldiers . It keeps their nerves on edge , so these kinds of things ARE going to happen ! Before you antiwar maggots jump on this , just remember , YOU would crap your pants and probably shoot yourself if faced with a similar situation . http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6416667.stm

I just read another article on this incident and I'm finding some rather interesting issues with some of the information when comparing the two.

For one thing, I know that there are some names over there that are fairly common, but the article that you posted describes on man using the name of Tur Gul as a civilian who was injured and made a statement to an AP reporter. The article I just read describes a man using the name Rahmat Gul as an AP photographer. Now I guess it could just be coincidence but I find it rather odd. Especially since the photographer named Gul was more concerned about filing a complaint against the U.S. troops for deleting his photos and video than he was about any injured people at the scene. So, I got to wondering if perhaps photographer Gul had a brother or cousin or someone who might have been willing to take a bullet in order to get a nice fat settlement out of the U.S. military as retribution.

Also in the article you posted they give the impression that these reporters are interviewing people on the street. One of the people interviewed was a 15 year old named Mohammad Ishaq who stated "When we parked our vehicle, when they passed us, they opened fire on our vehicle," then the reporter goes on to say this kid "was also hit by bullets." Now the article I'm reading says that the reporters didn't get to the scene until about 30 minutes after the incident took place. So why is this 15 year old kid not on his way to a hospital or clinic yet and still feeling up to doing an interview 30 minutes after being shot multiple times?

Sorry, but some of the news reports coming out of Afghanistan and Iraq just don't add up and I'm not buying it.