Originally Posted by graybeard

Diz,
The Washington Post is not an Internet Rag...Insightmag.com is. DO YOU GET IT?

Originally Posted by crowonapost

It's never wise to tell a crow to eat crow, I might let others join us at dinner as you eat from MY banquet.


What grade school level moronic responses are these inbred piles of crap....

I Will start with the polite juvenile retorts to Grey beard....



Then you really step up or down to I don't know 3rd grade with this witty rebuttal....



Then you just go off the charts of anything resembling dignified human behavior with this crap



All because your spineless juvenile intellect opinion & special bus capabilities as a debater are challenged by Karen saying this....

read your numerous posts for about 10 minutes on several threads and could see you had found a spot among dizzy nathan and rob who never do anything but pickup on some untruth and make posts on it. i think graybeard is one of our truthful posters and i listened to your crap long enough. yea real smart take your namecalling ideas from jimmy. i usually just read but had to say you are not truthful




Fantastic thanks for being the poster child of the WORST republican Neocon hack.
I would NEVER equate you to a conservative because that requires intellect, intelligence & real humanity.

Now let's close out with spineless defensive boy....



Wow.
I just sit back & watch your train wreck of witty rebuttals come crashing off the bridge of human discourse. Fantastic banal stupidity. I give you a solid Five stars for over the top weak kneed defensiveness.



You don't need to apologize you need a spine.




GB you Cawed it correctly from the beginning & Fabien er fenian just acted out like a the little spineless un-thought out reactionary he poses as a uhhhh debater. Maybe it's more correctly a debaser.




Anyway back to the actual thread subject. What I find intersting in this underbelly of Baraks history as a Muslim is how revealing this 'War on Terrorism' actually is to a segment of American society. It really is a bigotted war mentality.
We put on a show of saying it's just about the 'extremists' not Islam. Until a man with an Arabic based name actually might run for president then it's all We Don't want no dam Muslim running our country. Why Why he will force us to be Blackum & we will all be 'secretly' converted to his nefarious plan of Osama Ben Ladism....

How pathetic. Very Fabian er fenianforever1689 if you ask me.....

Originally Posted by Still Dizzy

The Washington Times, founded in 1893, PRINTS INSIGHT. Still confused?

Originally Posted by Areyouforreal

Why Grey if it is put out by the Washington Times?
Wouldn't it have the Time credability behind it?

Originally Posted by Areyouforreal

Why Grey if it is put out by the Washington Times?
Wouldn't it have the Time credability behind it?

Originally Posted by graybeard

How much credibility do those on the Right give the New York Times? Little if any. I feel the same way about the Washington Times and anything it publishes. Since www.insightmag.com is exclusively an Internet publication, it is therefore an INTERNET RAG., Just as I see the Washington Times as a Rightwing Rag.

Originally Posted by graybeard

How much credibility do those on the Right give the New York Times? Little if any. I feel the same way about the Washington Times and anything it publishes. Since www.insightmag.com is exclusively an Internet publication, it is therefore an INTERNET RAG., Just as I see the Washington Times as a Rightwing Rag.

Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45

My charges of censorship were not directed to hiding the fact that Obama was a Muslim, but the fact that Hilliary is making an issue of it. If Brownback or McCain had made this statement it would have been front page news and would have not 77 but 770 hits.

The left is hypocritical but that is not news is it?