"Fukuyama did not share the same degree of commitment to Israel as his Jewish colleagues. In The National Interest he complained not of actual subordination of American to Israeli objectives in the Middle East but rather of a mimesis of the Israeli outlook on the Arab world among too many of his companions. Applying a mailed fist to the region might well be rational for Tel Aviv, he remarked, but was not necessarily so for Washington. His criticism was tactful enough, but it met with a vehement response. Replying, Charles Krauthammer charged Fukuyama with inventing a "novel way of Judaizing neoconservatism..." -Perry Anderson

>>>I think Krauthammer is a pig. Any disagreement out there?

I disagree, but that would hardly surprise you.

"I disagree, but that would hardly surprise you."

<<<Nah, it doesn't suprise me, but Krauthammer is a Trotskyite who's willing to sacrifice America for his own barely hidden agenda. To my way of thinking, that constitutes a PIG.

You don't like ANY Jews right?

Remember during the OJ trial when all you rightwingers were bitching about Johnny Cochran playing the race card? My turn to bitch about Krauthammer playing the "anti-semite" card on Fukuyama. It's getting to be that if you don't like bagels, you're an anti-semite.

Owell obviously hates being labeled an anti-Semite, or rather being exposed as one.