Rupert Murdoch appeared in front of Congress several years ago and destroyed them.

How is it that you can be so concerned about Murdoch?

If your problem was the consoldation of media then shouldn't you be looking at Time-Warner?

Yes you would.

But the point is to attack what you all percieve as right wing media.

so you support Murdoch who you claim "destroyed" our congress? expand on how he destroyed this. Do you support his promotion of comunism and anti US sentiment in china so he can gain access to their growing economy and increase his billions? do you support his main publication "The sun " which promotes pornography,pedophilia, and whatever else smut he can dig up? Do you support any media outlet that puts such strict controls on their journalist? Time warner supported anderson Coopers how showing both sides of the Rumsfield controversy. Fox would never allow that. So you think Murdoch is great because he destroyed our congress. You are the most bizarre of all the posters. Do you think anyone person from a foreign country should control and manipulate all other countries for personal gain? I am not attacking right wing media...try the post or christain science monitor if you want american right wing journalism.

Which post? CSM is not right wing either.

just because they aren't confirmed marxists doesn't make them right wing.

Jimmy use the links to pull up"The sun" you can order a copy. That is Ruperts number one money maker and it is what spurred and funded Fox at the beginning.I have already seen them dozens of times. Fox is the cablenews version of this tabloid. Use the other link to pull up articles and videos of his anti american pro comunist sentiment(now I do not believe he is procomunist) just again momentarily changing politicals views for personal gain. He does nw have a monopoly of what information our society recieves and his goal is to manipulate. If tomorrow john Kerry backed a bill allowing foreign conglomerates lax laws to own 100% media Rupert and fox would jump ship and be 100% supporters. The point is "shoulld we have laws that allow a foreign media dynasty to takeover all of our media? Especially when they change views whenever and for whatever reason helps their personal empire? Can you address this question with half your post being quotes,obscene lanquage, racial slurs but a direct address of the topic?

__________________
BLIND FAITH IN BAD LEADERSHIP IS NOT PATRIOTISM

Ordinary Chinese citizens could soon be watching reruns of Friends, The Simpsons and Seinfeld while in return Americans will have the chance to watch a blend of cookery classes and state-sponsored propaganda from Beijing in a landmark television deal being forged between Rupert Murdoch, AOL Time Warner and the Chinese government.
- Danny Gittings in Hong Kong and Julian Borger in Washington
Thursday September 6, 2001


You may now consider it supported.

I've seen this satellite feed here in the US, just didn't realize Murdoch was behind it.

Look, Murdoch is a business man's business man. One of those guys that is simply here to make as much money as he can. I find his personal beliefs, convictions, etc to be very consistent. "Give the people what they want as long as it pays". Period! Looking any deeper than that is painting the horse red,... so to speak. (no, I don't know what that means either)

The point is, he doesn't have to subscribe to a single political view. He is not a government rep of any nation. Murdoch himself is not the issue. Every person in this country has the ability to turn off the media. Nearly issue is available for study in the form of official record if you care to visit your nearest mid sized library. This country has become complacent when it comes to finding things out for our selves. We tend to rely on hearsay generated by folks that have access to core information. That is to say, we leave it up to others to "interpret" the available information available and then scratch our heads when we can't figure out why the country is so divided.

If you rely solely on people selling books, waiting for raises on bloated salaries tied to ratings, foreign owned media outlets, etc to form your opinions, then we all become sycophants, easily manipulated, and ridiculously ineffectual in guiding OUR democracy.

Nope.

I agree with that entirely.

You are big on telling people what to do? Maybe your care-worn husband has to listen to your stupidity but I don't. Wink.

.

I feel sorry for your husband and your children.

Uhhhh, again you can only tell your hen-pecked husband what to do. Haha lol



Lenin had a term to describe you: useful idiot.


[quote[
If tomorrow john Kerry backed a bill allowing foreign conglomerates lax laws to own 100% media Rupert and fox would jump ship and be 100% supporters.
[/quote]

You don't acutally think that John Effing Kerry stands for the common man, do you?


So you are a bigoted, xenophobic person? Would it be okay if his name was Jacgues Murdoch and spoke in a French accent as opposed to a Aussie one?


Listen you stupid bitch. Can you prove that I have made a racial slur?

Until then you cannot expect me to respond pleasantly to your idiotic, and moronic statements.


You haven't raised any topics to be directly addressed dummy.

I glad you have this forum hurricane Jimmy so you can vent your anger towards your keyboard instead of people that come into direct contact with you.

Oh were that true!!!

Jimmy you have been outfoxed by fox and manipulated.

__________________
BLIND FAITH IN BAD LEADERSHIP IS NOT PATRIOTISM