Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > News and Current Events > Politics in the News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 08:09 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,220
Default

Quote:
In the First place: Democrat Christopher Dodd with $165,400
Second: Presidential Candidate Barack Obama with $126,349
Third: Democrat John Kerry with $111,000
11th: Democrat Harry Reed with $77,000
12th Hillary Clinton
18th Nancy Pelosi with $56,250
62th... Republican John McCain with $21,550.
217th is Joe Biden with $3,300
>>>I don't know what any of that means other than you don't usually have to pay people if you already have their support. So anybody NOT on that list was probably on board to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 08:10 PM
jebe's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,511
Default

with housing, its not one problm, and if it were, you must retreat back to when rampant speculation entered the picture. i havent seen a decently built house built after 1932. so lets reduce the size of the lumber, lets reduce the codes for grounding, and lest say we reduce the wire size for the electrical, to the point where it can fail. then lets fuck up the plumbing to. we'll go from cast iron drains, to this plastic shit that degrades fast with time. and lets use plastic, instead of copper. and the hell with brazing. we'll not only stop using silver solder, we'll just use tin. if it dont flow well with the flux, who gives a shit! so lets reduce our building codes, and allow the use of a fucking two by six, for a floor joist 13 and a half feet long. regardless of what tree it was made out of. HEY LOOKY, ITS A HOUSE! AND IT AINT FALLEN DOWN YET! IT MUST BE WORTH ALOT OF MONEY, CAUSE PEOPLE LIVE IN IT! so for a fucking 45k, i can build a 280k house on your secured lot, inside of five months. unless youd rather one that will fall down in a strong wind that is.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:12 AM
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,704
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nonsqtr View Post
Gramm-Leach-Bliley was authored by Phil Gramm, who is....

McCAIN'S top economic advisor!

McCain voted FOR Gramm-Leach-Bliley, and Biden voted against it.

McCain even wanted to Co-Sponsor the legislation, but it already had too many sponsors so they turned him down.

McCain is a LIAR!!! He's been on the wrong side of this equation from DAY ONE, and now suddenly in the last week he flip-flops and becomes an ardent supporter of regulations?

I THINK NOT!!!

Nice try though...
Not in favor of more regulation. But proper regulation. All this stuff happens when the regulators fall asleep at the wheel. The regulations and laws are already in place. How about we try something new and novel? How about we try and enforce the regulations and laws that are already on the books? Seems to be a bit easier than adding more and more laws and regulations that only hinder the law abiding business people.
__________________
Rod is the Coolest Most Politically Incorrect Conservative Black Man on the Planet
www.thelibertycafe.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:22 AM
Amazed's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 3,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nonsqtr View Post
I don't hear you contesting any part of what I said, though.

Because, it's all the TRUTH.

Which seems to be a problem with the Republi-Cons these days, they wouldn't know the truth if it came up and bit 'em on the nose!

Ths biggest problem most "debators" from EITHER side has is that they are simply unable to see past their own myopic view of what any given "truth" is. As with most, you are so intent on blame...you are completely unable to see that both sides are at fault.....that's Mulp's main problem too
__________________
There are those, I know, who will say that the liberation of humanity, the freedom of man and mind, is nothing but a dream. They are right. It is the American dream.
~Archibald MacLeish
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 10:56 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 989
Default

This was all heavily supported by the Reagan conservatives. It strains belief that internet creeps would somehow come back and try to blame democrats for this - even though there isn't much difference between them on this type of matter.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 10:59 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetblast View Post
This was all heavily supported by the Reagan conservatives. It strains belief that internet creeps would somehow come back and try to blame democrats for this - even though there isn't much difference between them on this type of matter.
Both sides did it, for differing reasons perhaps, but the same result.

But in the end, the American public did it to themselves. Just look at the success of shows like "Flip this house".
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 11:06 AM
nonsqtr's Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Burbank CA
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazed View Post
Ths biggest problem most "debators" from EITHER side has is that they are simply unable to see past their own myopic view of what any given "truth" is. As with most, you are so intent on blame...you are completely unable to see that both sides are at fault.....that's Mulp's main problem too

Still don't hear you contesting it.

You lose.

Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 11:12 AM
nonsqtr's Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Burbank CA
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reccles44 View Post
Not in favor of more regulation. But proper regulation. All this stuff happens when the regulators fall asleep at the wheel. The regulations and laws are already in place. How about we try something new and novel? How about we try and enforce the regulations and laws that are already on the books? Seems to be a bit easier than adding more and more laws and regulations that only hinder the law abiding business people.
Agreed.

Unfortunately, the way things are set up today, the regulators are mostly under the Executive Branch. For instance, Christopher Cox.

So, a guy like Bushie gets in there, he says, "Alberto, just put those federal housing discrimination cases at the bottom of the pile, and make sure they stay there", and voila.... no enforcement.

On the other hand, he says to Mueller, "make sure you go after those little old ladies up in Oregon, and put a few of 'em away to show 'em we mean business", and voila... heavy-handed enforcement.

So, it occurs to me, that ultimately, it is Congress who is mostly to blame in all this, since

a) they write the laws
b) they're SUPPOSED to oversee the President, and
c) they have THEMSELVES fallen down on the job when things like subpoenas get ignored, and then they let the prez get away with sending people up to the hill who "don't" testify under oath -

You know, so, my view is, CLEAN HOUSE. Vote each and every one of those incuments out of office. They've screwed up, BADLY. ALL of 'em!!!

I'm going to vote AGAINST all incumbents for the next four years, regardless of party.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 11:16 AM
Amazed's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 3,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nonsqtr View Post
Still don't hear you contesting it.

You lose.


Laughing, still don't see you understanding anything but your own myopic view
__________________
There are those, I know, who will say that the liberation of humanity, the freedom of man and mind, is nothing but a dream. They are right. It is the American dream.
~Archibald MacLeish

Last edited by Amazed; 09-19-2008 at 11:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 11:21 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 989
Default

It sounds to me like someone is in denial that all potential candidates are vetted so only those willing to carry on the status quo make it to that point. The American public has proven itself delinquent to Constitutional democracy (as this site more than proves). Water has found its lowest level and the system has structured itself to preclude any attempts to reform it whether that be politically or economically or both. People are pigs and any system they invent will succumb to decadence and corruption.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0