How the RNC bought the Police

dirtyp · #1 (**permalink**) 09-08-2008, 03:44 AM

The deal required the Republican Party’s host committee to buy insurance covering up to $10 million in damages and unlimited legal costs for law enforcement officials accused of brutality, violating civil More..rights and other misconduct.

Other cities who hosted conventions in recent years - including Denver, Boston, New York and Philadelphia - either covered those costs from their general budgets or used tax money to buy insurance policies.

But St. Paul officials, led by Mayor Chris Coleman, insisted the committee use its private donations to purchase the insurance policy. They had some leverage because the party had named St. Paul as the location for the convention before striking the city services agreement in January 2007.
How the RNC bought the Police | War On You

countryslim · #2 (**permalink**) 09-08-2008, 08:20 AM

I will never understand how you think.. All the paranoia will destroy ya..

New Poll on Fox.. McCain 54% ... Obama 44%.. lol.. loving it..

reccles44 · #3 (**permalink**) 09-08-2008, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirtyp

The deal required the Republican Party’s host committee to buy insurance covering up to $10 million in damages and unlimited legal costs for law enforcement officials accused of brutality, violating civil More..rights and other misconduct.

Other cities who hosted conventions in recent years - including Denver, Boston, New York and Philadelphia - either covered those costs from their general budgets or used tax money to buy insurance policies.

But St. Paul officials, led by Mayor Chris Coleman, insisted the committee use its private donations to purchase the insurance policy. They had some leverage because the party had named St. Paul as the location for the convention before striking the city services agreement in January 2007.
How the RNC bought the Police | War On You

So does that mean that if the DNC did the same thing that they bought the police first? I dont get the difference of who pays for the policy. The government buys the policy and its OK, but a private organization buys the policy and now they have bought the police?

Look, you and people like you wanted our nation flooded with 100k police more than we already had so live and deal with it. Besides I think all this police protection was needed more for the RNC because of all the whack jobs that protested and threw shit and piss and bottles and the like.

Ever notice how it always seems to be the way left wackos that cause so much public unrest?

alvagoldbook · #4 (**permalink**) 09-08-2008, 10:57 AM

So, financially speaking, the RNC allowed the pigs in St. Paul to violate the rights of people on the street, and they didn't worry about any litigation that would follow because the RNC had already paid the damages up front. Jesus. Jumping. Christ. Where do we live people? The United States of America or Nazi Germany?

You know those Bill of Rights that we love so much? Kiss it goodbye, because it's already gone.

36shadow · #5 (**permalink**) 09-08-2008, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alvagoldbook

So, financially speaking, the RNC allowed the pigs in St. Paul to violate the rights of people on the street, and they didn't worry about any litigation that would follow because the RNC had already paid the damages up front. Jesus. Jumping. Christ. Where do we live people? The United States of America or Nazi Germany?

You know those Bill of Rights that we love so much? Kiss it goodbye, because it's already gone.

Ya it suck ass don't it but don't be so blind as to not see the DNC convention they payed so much money they did not have any problems because they shut them down before hand. Locked those bastards(the american people)down.