Palin fires librarian in attempt to ban books

Lummy · #21 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 09:36 AM

Gee, observe how the little faggot Baakookoo's vitriol against a competent administrator projects virtually every one of the proclivities he himself has clearly demonstrated here at AWE. What a fuckshit queer you are, Baa.

Now, isn't a naked queerbot leaning against his headboard someone to take advice from?

Fuck off, Baa, you stinkin little shit.

TakuanSoho · #22 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Back Atcha

I am angry about it. Damned angry. Libraries and the materials they contain are, IMHO, one of the most important resources a community has.

As for this "just being local politics", that's a flimsy dismissal. If you take a look at the intent of the founders, political power flows from you and I, to local gov't, to state and then to federal gov't. Point is, it begins with informed citizens in even the smallest of burgs. It's a violation of freedom of speech and speaks to a will to invoke the thought police.

This is not as petty as it my at first seem on the surface.

I would take this with a dose of salt. When she was first elected mayor the powers who be were pissed and tried to get her recalled. They flung a bunch of crap at her during the process. These efforts died away pretty quickly, showing that there was no support, and probably not much in the way of truth behind it.

Show me the books she banned, then you have a point, otherwise you have hearsay.

Lummy · #23 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

I would take this with a dose of salt. When she was first elected mayor the powers who be were pissed and tried to get her recalled. They flung a bunch of crap at her during the process. These efforts died away pretty quickly, showing that there was no support, and probably not much in the way of truth behind it.

Show me the books she banned, then you have a point, otherwise you have hearsay.

Baakookoo is a study in queer agenda.

TakuanSoho · #24 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lummy

Baakookoo is a study in queer agenda.

Are you lummox?

Censorship is a serious issue. If Palin tried it would be a negative, however in that it appears all she did (if the stories are true) was ask about it and made no concentrated to accomplish it, then I am willing to give her a pass until more details are known.

Lummy · #25 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

1 Are you lummox?

2 Censorship is a serious issue. If Palin tried it would be a negative, however in that it appears all she did (if the stories are true) was ask about it and made no concentrated to accomplish it, then I am willing to give her a pass until more details are known.

1 No, I'm Lummy.

2 When television, especially PBS, produces shows that intentionally overrepresent blacks (symbolic "ethnic minorities) for sake of political correctness, am I suppose to rally to their black agenda for sake of free speech and political correctness? If I object and want that shit to stop, am I the big bad censor?

You don't need to lecture anybody on censorship or anything else, Mr T.

TakuanSoho · #26 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lummy

1 No, I'm Lummy.

2 When television, especially PBS, produces shows that intentionally overrepresent blacks (symbolic "ethnic minorities) for sake of political correctness, am I suppose to rally to their black agenda for sake of free speech and political correctness? If I object and want that shit to stop, am I the big bad censor?

You don't need to lecture anybody on censorship or anything else, Mr T.

It seems that I do since you have no idea what censorship is. PBS can put out anything they please, you can choose not to watch it. That isn't censorship. It is bad history, it is history with a political agenda, but it isn't censorship.

Lummy · #27 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

It seems that I do since you have no idea what censorship is. PBS can put out anything they please, you can choose not to watch it. That isn't censorship. It is bad history, it is history with a political agenda, but it isn't censorship.

Where in my post did I call PBS programming censorship? Can't you read?

TakuanSoho · #28 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lummy

Where in my post did I call PBS programming censorship? Can't you read?

Yes I can, but it seems you cannot. You specifically responded to my post about censorship with your unaccompanied example. Normal people would conclude you were trying to make a point. I see that you weren't. You were just looking for an excuse to spout your racist dribble.

Good to know.

Gummer · #29 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:45 AM

Dayum!!! Back Atcha is starting to foam at the mouth...... wasn't he claiming to be middle of the road a few weeks back? Of course, back then the libs thought they had this whole fucking election "in the bag". Now that it doesn't seem so certain, we see that he is nowhere near the road's middle ..... but is in the ditch on the left side of the road ........

Uncensored2008 · #30 (**permalink**) 09-03-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Back Atcha

Could there have been a more predictable reply? LMAO... Did you really think Fox would pick this up?

No reputable press would bother with anything so insignificant. Which explains why the NY Times (wholly owned subsidiary of the democratic party) did.

Quote:

It's been fact checked, it happened,

Whoop-de-dooo.

Bet she farted once, too!

Better get the Times right on that!

Your shameful party is desperate.