Global Warming (Again)

Amazed · #31 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

Apparently you were too busy with your trycycle to learn and hear about Global Cooling.

The Wall Street Journal Online - Hot Topic

"If arguments were won through the use of italics, Mr. Gore would prevail in a knockout. But as Mr. Hayward notes in his "Index," the environmental movement as a whole has developed a credibility problem since the first Earth Day 36 years ago. In the 1970s, prominent greens were issuing dire predictions about mass starvation, overpopulation and--of all things--global cooling. Since then, population-growth estimates have come way down, biotechnology advances have found ways to feed more people than the doomsayers believed possible, and the global-cooling crisis has become the global-warming crisis without missing a beat."

Climate myths: They predicted global cooling in the 1970s - climate-change - 16 May 2007 - New Scientist Environment

Don't you find it funny that Smart ignores everyone she decides she can't brow beat....and even when someone replies in thier own thread she thinks it's directed at her...

Amazed · #32 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 10:51 AM

Pictured: The floating cities that could one day house climate change refugees

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 2:13 AM on 04th July 2008

Comments (9) Add to My Stories
At first glance, they look like a couple of giant inflatable garden chairs that have washed out to sea

But they are, apparently, the ultimate solution to rapidly rising sea levels.

This computer-generated image shows two floating cities, each with enough room for 50,000 inhabitants. Based on the design of a lilypad, they could be used as a permanent refuge for those whose homes have been covered in water. Major cities including London, New York and Tokyo are seen as being at huge risk from oceans which could rise by as much as 3ft by the end of this century.

This solution, by the award-winning Belgian architect Vincent Callebaut, is designed to be a new place to live for those whose homelands have been wiped out.

The 'Lilypad City' would float around the world as an independent and fully self-sustainable home. With a lake at its centre to collect and purify rainwater, it would be accessed by three separate marinas and feature artificial mountains to offer the inhabitants a change of scenery from the seascape.

Power for the central accommodation hub is provided through a series of renewable energy sources including solar panels on the mountain sides, wind turbines and a power station to harness the energy of the waves.

Pictured: The floating cities that could one day house climate change refugees | Mail Online

You just cannot make this shit up.....and the Lefty's just eat it up....

smart makes a comeback · #33 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 10:53 AM

STILL......No one can name a SINGLE objetive expert to support the view that GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT MAN MADE

Imagine that...no one can name even ONE

LCOF · #34 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

STILL......No one can name a SINGLE objetive expert to support the view that GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT MAN MADE

Imagine that...no one can name even ONE

I see now we're saying "Global Climate Change". I guess it gives you zealot cover, just in case you're out of the loop, or not focused the day we enter Global Cooling again. Nice concept you can proffer anything you want, reject alternative views, and change the dynamic when it meets your agenda.

A. Crowley · #35 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

I see now we're saying "Global Climate Change". I guess it gives you zealot cover, just in case you're out of the loop, or not focused the day we enter Global Cooling again. Nice concept you can proffer anything you want, reject alternative views, and change the dynamic when it meets your agenda.

Yer a retard, Elcee..

smart makes a comeback · #36 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

I see now we're saying "Global Climate Change". I guess it gives you zealot cover, just in case you're out of the loop, or not focused the day we enter Global Cooling again. Nice concept you can proffer anything you want, reject alternative views, and change the dynamic when it meets your agenda.

I will accept the view of the fisrt non bias non discredited expert yo9u can sight that supports your view...again...that there is no man made cause or connection to Global WARMING

One...just one (1)

This is not too much to ask...it is in fact perfectly reasonable

LCOF · #37 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

I will accept the view of the fisrt non bias non discredited expert yo9u can sight that supports your view...again...that there is no man made cause or connection to Global WARMING

One...just one (1)

This is not too much to ask...it is in fact perfectly reasonable

You're lying, you would no more accept any other point of view any more than I would reject Christ as my Savior. This is a religion to you, this is your faith. That is why you refuse to answer how we got from Cooling in the 70s to warming now. You go no where near this.

Besides I believe based upon the ending of the Ice Age absent 1 Buick, that Nature (God) controls climate, and just as we have very little to do with nature, (can't stop tornadoes hurricanes, and earthquakes) there is very little we can do to cause them.

You go ahead and screw your mind up with man made dogma, that supports an agenda that will assure we transform the greatness of this nation into a third world country. You rely on the hypocritical message from algore. As for me I will trust in God. Besides He has a winning record where Gore is a loser, and a rather fat one too. And did I mention he's also a dumb ass.

smart makes a comeback · #38 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

You're lying, you would no more accept any other point of view any more than I would reject Christ as my Savior. This is a religion to you, this is your faith. That is why you refuse to answer how we got from Cooling in the 70s to warming now. You go no where near this.

Besides I believe based upon the ending of the Ice Age absent 1 Buick, that Nature (God) controls climate, and just as we have very little to do with nature, (can't stop tornadoes hurricanes, and earthquakes) there is very little we can do to cause them.

You go ahead and screw your mind up with man made dogma, that supports an agenda that will assure we transform the greatness of this nation into a third world country. You rely on the hypocritical message from algore. As for me I will trust in God. Besides He has a winning record where Gore is a loser, and a rather fat one too. And did I mention he's also a dumb ass.

Then prove me wrong, and youirself right, and give me the name of the non bias expert who agrees with you.
just one...(1)
Seems you cant...so WHO exactly is the loser and the dumb ass ? That would be you

By the way..next time you talk to God, see if you can get me the winning lottery number for next week....LOL...either that or up your med intake

What a putz

Oedipus Rex · #39 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 03:08 PM

Flat-Screen TV Gas 'a Climate Time Bomb'

Booming demand for flat-screen televisions could have a greater impact on global warming than the world's largest coal-fired power stations, scientists warn.

A greenhouse gas called nitrogen trifluoride, used to make the TVs, is 17,000 times more potent than carbon dioxide, said Michael Prather, director of the environment institute at the University of California, Irvine.

But no one yet knows how much of it is being released into the atmosphere by industry, a report in Britain's The Guardian said.

Prather's research shows production of the gas, which remains in the atmosphere for 550 years, is "exploding".

It is expected to double by next year, from the current 4,000 tons produced annually.

But unlike other key greenhouse gases — such as carbon dioxide, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs) — emissions of the gas are not restricted under the Kyoto protocol or similar agreements, The Guardian report said.

Prather and his colleague Juno Hsu — writing in the journal Geophysical Research Letters — said this year's production of nitrogen trifluoride is equivalent to 67 million tons of carbon dioxide.

That meant the gas has "a potential greenhouse impact larger than that of the industrialised nations' emissions of PFCs or SF6, or even that of the world's largest coal-fired power plants".

Air Products, which produces the gas for the electronics industry, told New Scientist that very little nitrogen trifluoride is released into the atmosphere.

But Prather raised concerns about companies being careless with the gas, given the lack of a regulatory framework.

______________-

Ok, you Liberal fucktards... throw away your flat screens. You're killing the goddamn environment. The polar bears are dying. The oceans are warming. And Mother Earth is going to hell in a hand basket.

smart makes a comeback · #40 (**permalink**) 07-05-2008, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oedipus Rex

Flat-Screen TV Gas 'a Climate Time Bomb'

Booming demand for flat-screen televisions could have a greater impact on global warming than the world's largest coal-fired power stations, scientists warn.

A greenhouse gas called nitrogen trifluoride, used to make the TVs, is 17,000 times more potent than carbon dioxide, said Michael Prather, director of the environment institute at the University of California, Irvine.

But no one yet knows how much of it is being released into the atmosphere by industry, a report in Britain's The Guardian said.

Prather's research shows production of the gas, which remains in the atmosphere for 550 years, is "exploding".

It is expected to double by next year, from the current 4,000 tons produced annually.

But unlike other key greenhouse gases — such as carbon dioxide, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs) — emissions of the gas are not restricted under the Kyoto protocol or similar agreements, The Guardian report said.

Prather and his colleague Juno Hsu — writing in the journal Geophysical Research Letters — said this year's production of nitrogen trifluoride is equivalent to 67 million tons of carbon dioxide.

That meant the gas has "a potential greenhouse impact larger than that of the industrialised nations' emissions of PFCs or SF6, or even that of the world's largest coal-fired power plants".

Air Products, which produces the gas for the electronics industry, told New Scientist that very little nitrogen trifluoride is released into the atmosphere.

But Prather raised concerns about companies being careless with the gas, given the lack of a regulatory framework.

______________-

Ok, you Liberal fucktards... throw away your flat screens. You're killing the goddamn environment. The polar bears are dying. The oceans are warming. And Mother Earth is going to hell in a hand basket.

But the real question is, how would your asian whore mailorder "wife" feel about throwing away your TV

You dont have a job, and stupid cunt must have spent a lot of time on her knees in the back room of that asian hostess bar she works in to buy it, so yopu better check with her first.

Just because you are such a dumb ass and she talked you into marrying her so she could get her green card, doest mean the bitch will let you actually make a decision like that, Like all saps who marry mail order whores, she owns you