Global Warming (Again)

wyatt earp · #21 (**permalink**) 07-03-2008, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

Gee I am to take you at your word when I don't believe algore the Carbon hog.
Don't insult my intelligence.

I had a hunch the WND article would not pass muster with a zealot.

So I offer a Google search find one that fits.

Meanwhile are you wimping out on the what happened within the past 35 years, that got us from cooling to warming? Why can't someone who claims to have all the answers, expects me to take you at your word, that the "Oregon petition" was discredited (with no proof I might add) and can't explain how we got from cooling to warming.

Answer to the first is it happened by NATURE Which indicates we mankind have no control over. Get it? There's the elephant in the room. It infers God, and you GW zealots want nothing to do with God in your religion.

I was born in 1965, what the hell are you talking about cooling to warming?it seems to me it is hot out side as it was in 1973.

smart makes a comeback · #22 (**permalink**) 07-03-2008, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

Gee I am to take you at your word when I don't believe algore the Carbon hog.
Don't insult my intelligence.

I had a hunch the WND article would not pass muster with a zealot.

So I offer a Google search find one that fits.

Meanwhile are you wimping out on the what happened within the past 35 years, that got us from cooling to warming? Why can't someone who claims to have all the answers, expects me to take you at your word, that the "Oregon petition" was discredited (with no proof I might add) and can't explain how we got from cooling to warming.

Answer to the first is it happened by NATURE Which indicates we mankind have no control over. Get it? There's the elephant in the room. It infers God, and you GW zealots want nothing to do with God in your religion.

Nice attempt at doging the facts, but I have addressed all your silly elementary questions, called BS on your silly Google search and the long ago debunked "Oregen petition" (one of the most noted internet hoaxes in recent memory) and blown you silly ass contentions out of the water.

Flawed Oregon Petition Rises Again | DeSmogBlog

Now,,,if you cant name a single expert who supports your opinion, just say so.

It is rehtorical anyway...becuse you cant

LCOF · #23 (**permalink**) 07-03-2008, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

Nice attempt at doging the facts, but I have addressed all your silly elementary questions, called BS on your silly Google search and the long ago debunked "Oregen petition" (one of the most noted internet hoaxes in recent memory) and blown you silly ass contentions out of the water.

Flawed Oregon Petition Rises Again | DeSmogBlog

Now,,,if you cant name a single expert who supports your opinion, just say so.

It is rehtorical anyway...becuse you cant

HOW DID WE GET FROM COOLING 35 YEARS AGO TO WARMING. DID THE CAT EAT YOUR TONGUE?

smart makes a comeback · #24 (**permalink**) 07-03-2008, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

HOW DID WE GET FROM COOLING 35 YEARS AGO TO WARMING. DID THE CAT EAT YOUR TONGUE?

Are you stupid ?
LOL

Can you not understand that a short term fluxuation has nothing to do with a long term climatic change ?

Why dont you have those experts who agree with you explain it to you..,.oh wait...there are none are there...LOL

Just ONE who supports your views...still waiting

LCOF · #25 (**permalink**) 07-03-2008, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

Are you stupid ?
LOL

Can you not understand that a short term fluxuation has nothing to do with a long term climatic change ?

Why dont you have those experts who agree with you explain it to you..,.oh wait...there are none are there...LOL

Just ONE who supports your views...still waiting

You're unreasonable. You reject any alternative and have bought into the hoax, like a street whore thinking she will get paid fair from the pimp. But you can reject science that counters your religious zealotry, but I am the problem because I use my brain to sort through the hoax. So typical.

Then you answer the cooling to warming with psychobabble and this is gospel. Well genius the same mindset 30 years ago said we are going to freeze to death. The same scientific consensus then painted doom and gloom. Change this, stop that, regulate, tax and time passes. One day I wake up, and the same mentality is telling me we are going to burn up.

So was science failed then? Did they over react then? If they did , then are they doing the same thing in warming? What do we believe? What fits the Marxist agenda? Is that what we are to believe? If science was wrong in the 70s there is probability they could be wrong today.

And only a dummy would not consider this. Are you the dummy? I think you are.

I am done with you. I love a good give and take but you are thick. Go hug a tree.

Jetblast · #26 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 12:25 AM

These neo-kooks are obviously pretty dumb - which explains their politics and why they can only function in this crank room.

The ice age ended because the major warming periods were caused by natural Earth cycles that could have something to do with the axis wobbling or other orbital effects.

You people are idiots who latch on to the first crap you see and defend it with that redneck "pry it out of my cold dead hand" paranoia.

Meanwhile we have a record spike to 385ppm of CO2 we have to worry about. We don't know what such an unprecedented spike can do. Certainly dumb-ass denial propaganda isn't a good idea.

LCOF · #27 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wyatt earp

I was born in 1965, what the hell are you talking about cooling to warming?it seems to me it is hot out side as it was in 1973.

Apparently you were too busy with your trycycle to learn and hear about Global Cooling.

The Wall Street Journal Online - Hot Topic

"If arguments were won through the use of italics, Mr. Gore would prevail in a knockout. But as Mr. Hayward notes in his "Index," the environmental movement as a whole has developed a credibility problem since the first Earth Day 36 years ago. In the 1970s, prominent greens were issuing dire predictions about mass starvation, overpopulation and--of all things--global cooling. Since then, population-growth estimates have come way down, biotechnology advances have found ways to feed more people than the doomsayers believed possible, and the global-cooling crisis has become the global-warming crisis without missing a beat."

Climate myths: They predicted global cooling in the 1970s - climate-change - 16 May 2007 - New Scientist Environment

smart makes a comeback · #28 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LCOF

You're unreasonable. You reject any alternative and have bought into the hoax, like a street whore thinking she will get paid fair from the pimp. But you can reject science that counters your religious zealotry, but I am the problem because I use my brain to sort through the hoax. So typical.

Then you answer the cooling to warming with psychobabble and this is gospel. Well genius the same mindset 30 years ago said we are going to freeze to death. The same scientific consensus then painted doom and gloom. Change this, stop that, regulate, tax and time passes. One day I wake up, and the same mentality is telling me we are going to burn up.

So was science failed then? Did they over react then? If they did , then are they doing the same thing in warming? What do we believe? What fits the Marxist agenda? Is that what we are to believe? If science was wrong in the 70s there is probability they could be wrong today.

And only a dummy would not consider this. Are you the dummy? I think you are.

I am done with you. I love a good give and take but you are thick. Go hug a tree.

And yet you cant name a SINGLE credible expert who agrees with you....Not surprising, since you then tap dance around the science of the issue, with a proud display of voluntary ignorance /....check and mate

You're right...you are done

Amazed · #29 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetblast

These neo-kooks are obviously pretty dumb - which explains their politics and why they can only function in this crank room.

The ice age ended because the major warming periods were caused by natural Earth cycles that could have something to do with the axis wobbling or other orbital effects.

You people are idiots who latch on to the first crap you see and defend it with that redneck "pry it out of my cold dead hand" paranoia.

Meanwhile we have a record spike to 385ppm of CO2 we have to worry about. We don't know what such an unprecedented spike can do. Certainly dumb-ass denial propaganda isn't a good idea.

SHHHH Jet, Adults, not SmartMakes, but OTHER Adults are talking...you are too young to even know that we were all warned we were going to die from Global Cooling in the 70's..then it was Acid Rain, then it was the "Population Boom" that was going to get us...so please....spare us your histrionics.

smart makes a comeback · #30 (**permalink**) 07-04-2008, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

And yet you cant name a SINGLE credible expert who agrees with you....Not surprising, since you then tap dance around the science of the issue, with a proud display of voluntary ignorance /....check and mate

You're right...you are done

Quote:

Today 08:48 AM
Amazed This user is on your Ignore List.

Another refugeee for the flat earth (global warming) thread. Seems they are so frustrated that all they do down there is engage in a dumb ass circle jerk, they had to bring their silly ass nonsense to another thread