UN bans criticism of Islamic Law

itsplayed · #1 (**permalink**) 06-30-2008, 09:38 AM

Further proof that the war on the west by Islam is in full swing. The west must first be prepped before a push is made towards that one world under Sharia Law goal that drives Islam presses on and what better place to start than by banning any criticism of Islamic law over at the UN first?

Discussion of religious questions now banned at UN Human Rights Council
Submitted by admin on 23 June, 2008 - 06:23. UN Geneva Freedom of expression Alert/Warning

The UN Human Rights Council is not allowed to judge religions, according to president Doru Romulus Costea of Romania. Criticism of Sharia law or fatwas is now forbidden.

This ruling follows attempts by the Egyptian and Pakistani delegates at the Council to silence criticism of human rights abuse in the Islamic world.

Discussion of religious questions now banned at UN Human Rights Council | International Humanist and Ethical Union

ianastburyilove · #2 (**permalink**) 07-01-2008, 12:53 PM

Muslims will take over the earth by systematically killing people one by one. They are doing such a good job. But its gross to marry your relative and fuck your sister before you kill her for being raped.

LCOF · #3 (**permalink**) 07-01-2008, 01:51 PM

That's a good idea. Now that they have banned criticism of a governing style that despite they are involved in 15 wars, and battles in the world today; that has advanced more human rights violations towards non Muslims. Do you think the time is now to have the UN ban bashing the USA? Don't think so, just wanted to make the point, that the UN will tolerate atrocities in the name of Allah, and denounce the USA who has stood throughout history to advance human rights. Screw the UN.

itsplayed · #4 (**permalink**) 07-01-2008, 02:59 PM

Quote:

.....that the UN will tolerate atrocities in the name of Allah, and denounce the USA who has stood throughout history to advance human rights. Screw the UN.

Agreed, and it's just another reason that makes an Obama presidential appointment so dangerous, given the fact that Obama would like to see U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the UN.
If Obama is elected POTUS, I see Israel attacking Iran's nuclear sites soon afterward.....guaranteed.

LCOF · #5 (**permalink**) 07-01-2008, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsplayed

Agreed, and it's just another reason that makes an Obama presidential appointment so dangerous, given the fact that Obama would like to see U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the UN.
If Obama is elected POTUS, I see Israel attacking Iran's nuclear sites soon afterward.....guaranteed.

John Bolton has made that claim, that after the election and before Bush is gone Israel will attack Iran. It works for me.